Hi,
I am trying to configure the APS on the same router with my provider
mux. I have Cisco 7204vxr with dual PA-POS-OC3SMI interface and using
c7200-p-mz.124-25b.bin image. My provider has provided me two STM-1 for
redundancy from their mux.
When primary link goes down it switches back to
The WS-X6704-10GE has:
- Xenpacks
- only 16MB buffers per port compared to 200MB on WS-X6708
- is about 5 years old. I remember this was the first 10G card we used
in 6500 back in 2005/6
- traditionally targeted for LAN and DC segment with simple/none QoS
- hence the QoS implementation is simple
Hi,
It looks like you are trying to configure this on the WS-X67xy cards,
which are basically the LAN/DC cards taken from 6500. These cards have
very limited QoS capabilities as they are targetted for LAN/DC
segment, not for service provider. Hence you cannot expect MUCH.
If you need
Actually I am using a SIP-600 with a SPA-5X1GE.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Skovajsa [mailto:pavel.skova...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 1:08 PM
To: Kevin Warwashana
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 Rate Limiting Output
Hi,
It looks like
well, that kind of makes my earlier post not relevant.
Anyway, noticed that you are trying to police egress. I don't know
about SIP-600 but normally this is not possible - you need to SHAPE.
So change police to shape.
-pavel
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Kevin Warwashana kev...@telnetww.com
I have errors in a ge interface. The error count is
the same for input, ignored and rx_resource_error
there are no overrun errors and have:
Input queue: 0/75/3/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Any ideas what might cause this and how to resolve?
See below:
On 24 Jan 2010, at 03:46, Kevin Warwashana wrote:
int gig4/0/0.8
service-policy output 26MB-OUTPUT
Police and strict priority must be configured together for egress QOS.
Invalid feature combination for the class class-default
Configuration failed
This looks like what you see
On 30 Jan 2010, at 17:59, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
Cisco quickly found out that you cannot do much sophisticated stuff
with cards above and came with ES product line for service provider
segment - which is the ES20 and newer ES+
Thanks. I had missed the ES+ line cards since they are a bit obscured on the
main web page of the 7600. I'm definitely going to run everything by/through
cisco, but my experience is that if you don't know enough to ask the right
questions, you end up with whatever hardware they are pushing that
Well the problem is that you are originating the the route as opposed to
receiving it, so it would not come from anywhere. Not sure if this could even
work. What if you tried it without a route source or by redistributing
connected instead of a network statement? Most likely it won't work
10 matches
Mail list logo