hi all
i posted this issue earlier but didnt get a solution
anyway the MTU settings from both side are the same 1500 bytes
i dont think that the MTU modification from Cisco side as its related to the
number of packets sent from the ASN side and received by the Cisco side
i was viewing the
I'm having difficulty finding any details on the size of the port buffers
and/or queue type on the RSP720-3C-10GE sup card for a 7606-s. Anyone know the
queue type (receive 8q4t, transmit 1p7q4, etc...) or port buffer size (16mb,
200mb, etc..).
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville
I know SRE is fairly green still, but has anyone noticed any crazy bugs
pertaining to BGP, EoMPLS or OSPF that might make this code inappropriate for a
production environment?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tue, 4 May 2010 10:23:00 -0400, you wrote:
I'm having difficulty finding any details on the size of the port buffers
and/or queue type on the RSP720-3C-10GE sup card for a 7606-s. Anyone know
the queue type (receive 8q4t, transmit 1p7q4, etc...) or port buffer size
(16mb, 200mb, etc..).
I actually had this link open - check it:
http://www.ciscosecure.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/Hardware/12.2SR_supported_hw/7600_hwd.html#wp1030392
8q8t/1p7q8t
http://www.ciscosecure.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/Hardware/12.2SR_supported_hw/7600_hwd.html#wp1030392I
couldn't find anything on the
Thanks. That answers the QOS question, the ports have 8q8t/1p7q8t. Still
haven't found the port buffer size on them though. Is it 16mb per port like the
6704 or the 200mb like the 6708?
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
http://www.ox.com |
I'm looking to find something I can implement that will monitor all ospf
changes in a nice clear manner. Snmp traps are ok but, they don't make things
easy for multiple people to see. Any suggestions will be great.
___
cisco-nsp mailing
hi mohammad,
what kind of linecards are you using? what capacity? how many links
per ether-channel?
we had similar problems with overruns at ingress because of egress
congestion. there are different workarounds for each setup. all
problems are related to buffers and fabric connections though.
Hi Drew,
%MLSCEF-2-FIB_TCAM_WRITE_INCONSISTENCY: FIB TCAM Mismatch for [chars]:
Index: [dec]
Expected: Entry: [hex]-[hex]-[hex]
Hardware: Entry: [hex]-[hex]-[hex]
Possible problem in writing to the specified FIB TCAM entry. The
specific entry could be bad.
*Recommended Action: *Copy the message
Hi Everyone:
I am curious: is anyone doing BGP, with Full routes, on a GSR?
I am asking because, I have Transit circuit terminated on a 3-Port GigE Line
Card, on a GSR 12008 runing PRP-2. Remote peer is sending FULL BGP routes. As
soon as the BGP session comes up, however, the line card
Dominic,
I have a link in my history, so I am sure that I have seen the issue but
do not recall the specifics.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps359/products_tech_note09186a0080110d68.shtml#ts3
Good luck.
Billy
Dominic wrote:
Hi Everyone:
I am curious: is anyone doing
I setup a GRE tunnel between two locations served by a Comcast business
class cable modem.
Config example. The remote end is the same.
Tunnel73
ip address yy.yy.yy.yy 255.255.255.252
ip mtu 1476
ip tcp adjust-mss 1460
tunnel source x
tunnel destination z
tunnel
Could it be a software bug by any chance? Those 3ge cards are pretty
old...look for CSCsc66938 on this page:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/release/ntes/120SCAVS.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/release/ntes/120SCAVS.html--
Stephen F. Cobb • Senior Sales Engineer
Hi,
The book may appear dated (2002) but most of us still find it useful.
I just checked the Cisco Press website with the intention of buying a few
hard copies.
However, the site says of the book
http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587050412This
publication is not for sale.
Hello Dominic:
It looks like you only have 256 Mb of Packet Ram. You should probably
upgrade to 512 MB. I run multiple full peers on 3 port GE cards with no
trouble, but they are all set to 512/512.
Regards,
Mike
On 5/4/10 2:03 PM, Dominic domi...@broadconnect.ca wrote:
Hi Everyone:
I
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ML
The two tunnel endpoints are ME3400s.
I believe GRE Tunnels are not supported on ME3400. The packets hit the
CPU which is not very fast on that platform.
I know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Felix,
On 05/05/2010 00:41, Felix Nkansah wrote:
Which other good books still in print would you recommend as an ISP
operations practices guide?
Take a look at this recent thread (Books for the NOC guys) from
the NANOG list:
Attached is a NAGIOS module that I've put together.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michael Sprouffske
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:38 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ospf monitor
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michael K. Smith
Hello Dominic:
It looks like you only have 256 Mb of Packet Ram. You should probably
upgrade to 512 MB. I run multiple full peers on 3 port GE cards with
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Michael K. Smith wrote:
It looks like you only have 256 Mb of Packet Ram. You should probably
upgrade to 512 MB. I run multiple full peers on 3 port GE cards with no
trouble, but they are all set to 512/512.
Engine 2 linecards has a max of 256 megs of route memory, so I
I have a link in my history, so I am sure that I have seen the issue
but
do not recall the specifics.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps359/products_tech_note0
9186
a0080110d68.shtml#ts3
+1, you might want to enable ip cef linecard ipc memory 1 or to
allocate more
21 matches
Mail list logo
