Hi Sophan,
something seems to be wrong or missing here.
1st option:
If your mask 255.255.0.0 given is correct there'd have to be a plain L2-segment
without any L3 device in the middle, as 10.125.25.5 and 10.125.19.x reside in
the same subnet. Of course 10.125.19.x also has to be 255.255.0.0
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 03:10:07 am Christopher E. Brown
wrote:
That only works until aq high $$$ customer starts
demanding 9000byte payloads for their IP in vrf or VPLS
service...
We run two networks - one for IP Transit, another for
national Metro-E (different companies, so don't think
On 29 June 2010 09:31, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net wrote:
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 03:10:07 am Christopher E. Brown
wrote:
That only works until aq high $$$ customer starts
demanding 9000byte payloads for their IP in vrf or VPLS
service...
We run two networks - one for IP Transit,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Rens wrote:
Dear all,
Is it normal that the show processes memory shows so little free memory for
lsmpi_io?
Yes, it is completely normal -- similar to how it's normal for the
Fast pool on a GSR/GRP or 7500/RSP to have very little free memory.
The analogy ends there.
Hello list,
I have been receiving theese messages for months now on several routers of
ours (7204 VXR, NPE-400 / NPE-G1, running
c7200-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SRD.bin).
Jun 24 14:05:41.306: %IDMGR-3-INVALID_ID: bad id in id_to_ptr (bad id) (id:
0x0)
-Traceback= 6061CB64 6061D0C4 6063762C
CSCsw43211 or some variant thereof, upgrade to SRD2 was last suggestion
I was given.
I would personally avoid SRD2 having good experience /so far/ with SRD3
for PPP termination.
Dave.
Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
Hello list,
I have been receiving theese messages for months now on several
Hello,
Thanks David for your prompt reply. We use them two for PPP termination.
I have been thinking for a long time about upgrading to SRE, maybe SRE1.
Any feedbacks on theese ?
Thanks.
Y.
2010/6/29 David Freedman david.freed...@uk.clara.net
CSCsw43211 or some variant thereof, upgrade
Best to lab this sort of thing up. You can test scale/radius/etc handling using
bulk session generation from a *nix system, examples and info here:
http://www.jacco2.dds.nl/networking/openswan-l2tp.html#L2TPoverview
-Tk
-Original Message-
From: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've actually been using openl2tpd
(http://www.openl2tp.org/doc/openl2tpd) , the documentation is pretty
poor but it certainly works well for me for generating bulk sessions,
Dave.
tkap...@gmail.com wrote:
Best to lab this sort of thing up. You can
On 6/29/2010 4:57 AM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:26:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamssonswm...@swm.pp.se
To: Paulp...@gtcomm.net
Cc:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Centos upload speed slower on 1000m than 100m
over WAN
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 05:43:49 pm Mateusz Blaszczyk wrote:
I am curious - what is your MPLS L3 VPNs running on ?
(if you provide such)
It's two different companies - I just happen to spend time
at both :-). Translated: different operations.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
I have an old (~7 years) Sup720 PFC3BXL that has been running fine for
all it's life and is now to act as a secondary node in a new place.
I've loaded it with the new config and new IOS and (soft) reloaded a
couple of times; no problems there. But when I hard reload it (i.e.
take away power) the
Dear All,
currently i prepare my home lab for Cisco Cert. need your guys opinion what
easier small application for radius server for my home lab.
Regards,
-Suryantofang-
Fly Higher - Run Faster
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:53:48 +0200, you wrote:
It smells like a battery of some kind run dry, combined with the
NVRAM not being flash based. Anybody have a clue about what I
could do? Other than have it replaced? :-)
The solution *is* to have it RMA'ed. I just had a similar case on a
7600.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Rens r...@autempspourmoi.be wrote:
Did anyone actually give any recommendations?
I'm looking for the same advice to run BGP, OSPF maybe L2TPv3 later
Hi Rens - sorry for late reply as I was on vacation.
I'm running
There are ROMMON upgrades for the Sup720.
However it sounds like you have a problem with the NVRAM.
It sounds like the older NVRAM was not flash based and
the battery has died. It may be possible to replace the
battery if it isn't part of the NVRAM unit and isn't
soldered to the Sup720.
LR
Still having issues, although I tried to follow your suggestions. Here is my
config, can you tell me if im heading in the right direction? I think im
confused on the SVI portion, each time I try to set an IP to the port
interface, it tells me it overlaps with the vlan IP.
Current configuration
Is anyone aware of a MIB that supports querying the number of prefixes
(not the individual prefixes) received from a BGP peer?
CISCO-BGP4-MIB has this:
cbgpPeerTable Support
The cbgpPeerTable has been modified to support the enhancements
described in this document. The following new table
I finally got it figured out, that last email was a huge help, thank you! I set
the ports to their specified vlans, then set each vlan to an IP on the specific
segments, and turned on ip routing. My config is below:
User Access Verification
Password:
Switchen
Password:
Switch#show
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 18:24 +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:53:48 +0200, you wrote:
Anybody have a clue about what I could do? Other than have it
replaced? :-)
The solution *is* to have it RMA'ed.
We currently have no service contract covering hardware
Hey there,
I'm prodding around at a couple of different IOSes and googling, and it seems
as though 6PE is well documented, but
while I can see white papers about MPLS over native ipv6, I'm not exactly sure
how well supported it really is.
Anyone got the info on this? Supported trains for the
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 09:20 -0700, Mack McBride wrote:
There are ROMMON upgrades for the Sup720.
I found the images on CCO. And I can see that I even have an older one
lying around, but somehow I can't find the procedure for doing a ROMMON
upgrade. My (non-ECC!) memory tells me that I once
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 13:17 -0500, Sophan Pheng wrote:
Here is my config, can you tell me if im heading in the right
direction?
[...]
interface Vlan2
ip address 10.125.25.4 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan3
ip address 10.125.19.5 255.255.255.0
!
[...]
That part would seem right, if the
You can upgrade multiple slots and sp and rp during a single reload.
upgrade rom-monitor slot x [sp|rp] file y
reload
Mack
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rathlev [mailto:pe...@rathlev.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:21 PM
To: Mack McBride
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I have two devices where one keeps itself synchronized to within 5-10
usec of the NTP servers but the other one varies _wildly_, sometimes
having an offset of ~150 ms. The NTP servers are two CentOS 5.4 servers,
themselves using two Meinberg M300 GPS devices as stratum 1 sources.
Working device:
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 15:01 -0700, Mack McBride wrote:
You can upgrade multiple slots and sp and rp during a single reload.
upgrade rom-monitor slot x [sp|rp] file y
reload
Ah, it was really simple. Thank you. :-)
--
Peter
___
cisco-nsp
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 18:37 -0400, Matthew Huff wrote:
You need 3, preferably 4 NTP sources so that clients will work
correctly. If you have 2, how does it know which one is a better
source of time? 3 gives you a quorum, but if 1 fails, then you are
back to 2. Four is the magic number.
I would try using the same IOS version as the working one and see if it
synchronizes
(understand that might not be possible), that would tell you if it is hardware
or software.
A bad clock crystal or capacitor will definitely cause problems but it could
just be software.
Mack
-Original
You need 3, preferably 4 NTP sources so that clients will work correctly. If
you have 2, how does it know which one is a better source of time? 3 gives you
a quorum, but if 1 fails, then you are back to 2. Four is the magic number.
Since you have 2 setup as strata 1, setup two boxes that use
I would bet a bad clock crystal.
BTW, some of the ntp code won't kick in to correct time if there isn't a
quorum, but I'm willing to bet your clock is too bad for even NTP to fix. One
thing to check, is that router in a closet with cooling issues? Heat can cause
the clock crystal to become
Hi Christian,
Most recent IOS versions should support 6PE. The command mpls ipv6
source-interface has been removed from most recent IOS versions as well. This
command only applied to locally originated traffic and the source address
selection is now as per RFC3484.
Regards
Le 2010-06-29 à
From: cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tue, 29 June, 2010 23:15:20
Subject: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 91, Issue 107
Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
To
32 matches
Mail list logo
