Greetings,
I'm trying to come up with a small office router/switch configuration.
This would be an office with a DSL or T1 with 4-8 IP phones and the same
in computers. Requirements are as follows:
- Covad split PVC voice/data for QoS
- LLDP to dynamically assign VLANs to phones and keep c
New discovery, no matter what, the router will not let me login to the
IP on the serial interface if it's on a VRF. I can login to an
Ethernet interface on the same VRF going through the serial interface.
This seems to be what was tripping me up.
Is this a bug? It sure feels like one.
On Fri,
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:37:32 +0200, you wrote:
> The 2960 is a L2 switch. It can't do unicast routing either...
OT, but actually it can. Just only static unicast routing.
Release notes: "When you configure the new lanbase-routing SDM
template, the switch supports static routing and router ACLs
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:14:23PM -0400, Steven Pfister wrote:
> Thanks for your help... I think I almost got it but I'm running into a
> problem. It turns out the encoders on the remote site aren't connected
> directly to the 4506, but go to a 2960-48TC-L first. The IOS on that switch
> d
If the switch doesn't provide layer 3 services (routing) itself, but is really
a l2 switch, then you don't need multicast routing / pim, etc...However, you
should have igmp snooping on.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.ne
I can read the doc and understand what it's trying to tell me
(http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t14/feature/guide/gt_bgiv
t.html). What I don't understand is how this can work both ways.
Say there is route 10.1.1.0/24 in global via g1/1 10.2.2.2.
VRF Green has 172.31.1.0/24, 172.31.2.
Thanks for your help... I think I almost got it but I'm running into a problem.
It turns out the encoders on the remote site aren't connected directly to the
4506, but go to a 2960-48TC-L first. The IOS on that switch doesn't seem to
support ip multicast routing and I tried to find one that does
Every routed hop in the path must be running PIM and your layer two
interfaces need to have IGMP enabled.
Let us know how it goes!
John
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Steven Pfister wrote:
> So, in my configuration that I mentioned, not only the 4506 on the remote
> site, the central site 451
So, in my configuration that I mentioned, not only the 4506 on the remote site,
the central site 4510 and 8540 need PIM enabled (which I think is the case
now), but the 3560 needs it as well? I think that may be my problem... I'll
look into that.
Steve Pfister
Technical Coordinator,
The Office
hi all
i have Cisco SCE2020-4XGBE-MM and i have CM and SM
what are the best ways (or commands) to check the functionality of the device
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://pu
This was passed over to me on the 3945e:
The 3945e should be able to do this as well. It has a max limit of 3500
tunnels It will also do 330
Mbps encrypted through 2000 tunnels.
Disclaimer: I have not seen the actual testing results for this but to
pass it as some general guidance.
Rodne
I asked around for you to a few of my peers that are more IPSEC savvy.
They informed me:
The ASR or the 65xx with the VPN SPA should be able to do it.
There is also the ASA-5580 and the new ASA-5585.
The 3945e has some pretty high numbers also.
Rodney
On 10/8/10 12:04 PM, Matteo Castelli
ying-xiang wrote:
> hi,everyone
>
> i got a very strage problem about stm-1 which installed in a cisco 7606-s
> chassis with a sup-32 engine.
>
> according to the 3-7-3 divide the stm-1 into 63 2MB E1 ports that are
> connected to our branch devices,respectively
>
> recently,many 2MB lines
Thanks all for your answers,
My initial question may now have been that well formulated/clear.
I was not asking why you need to shape on a sub-rate. I.E my first
example 5meg on a 10meg link.
I was asking if you benefit from shaping a 1984 to 1984, to utilize
more buffers etc, to delay instead o
14 matches
Mail list logo
