[c-nsp] CoPP for SSH on nexus 7k. Confused!

2010-10-19 Thread Shanawaz
** ip addresses used are imaginary ** Here's a really dumbed down version of my CoPP implementation. Its pretty simple. I have ACL's to allow ssh from anywhere in my network, and then allow telnet from anywhere in my network (note there is an unintentional deny statement in that access-list). Then

[c-nsp] SLA tracking, what do you ping?

2010-10-19 Thread Jay Nakamura
When you use IP SLA to track if an upstream is working on a ISP connection (From customer point of view, and you are not the ISP that knows what will be safe to ping), what do you usually configure to ping? I have found that one hop up from the CPE is not necessary reliable on DSL/Cable. I was wo

[c-nsp] 6pe Cisco-Juniper Re: RFC 4798 IPv6 over IPv4 MPLS Backbone Configuration

2010-10-19 Thread Jared Mauch
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_data_sheet09186a008052edd3.html http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos82/feature-guide-82/download/fg-ipv6-over-mpls.pdf On Oct 19, 2010, at 6:25 PM, texas ex wrote: > Hi All, > > I was wondering if someone could poin

[c-nsp] RFC 4798 IPv6 over IPv4 MPLS Backbone Configuration

2010-10-19 Thread texas ex
Hi All, I was wondering if someone could point me to Cisco documentation on how to configure a Cisco box to exchange IPv6 reachability information based on RFC 4798 in BGP (especially when the BGP neighbor is a non-Cisco device such as Juniper). Thanks. ___

[c-nsp] Redistributing ipv6 static default route into eigrp failure

2010-10-19 Thread Matthew Huff
Okay, I must be missing something. I've setup a default static route that is showing up in the ipv6 route tables, but not in the local ipv6 eigrp topology nor redistributing out. Anyone have a clue? Or yet another ipv6 bug interface Vlan4 ip address 129.77.4.252 255.255.255.0 ipv6 address 2620

Re: [c-nsp] sh proc cpu hist - 3750 stack

2010-10-19 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 15:48 -0500, Jeff Wojciechowski wrote: > So - that begs the question - how can I see the CPU utilization on the > 2 server switches (which happen to be about 20 degrees F hotter than > the client switches so I know they are working harder)? You could use "remote command show

[c-nsp] sh proc cpu hist - 3750 stack

2010-10-19 Thread Jeff Wojciechowski
All- We have a stack of five 3750G-48TS switches and am curious if it's possible to find the cpu utilization of each member of the stack? According to http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/troubleshooting/cpu_util.html "In a switch stack, CPU utilization is measure

Re: [c-nsp] Using address-family context

2010-10-19 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, On 20 October 2010 03:39, Randy McAnally wrote: > Is it safe for existing BGP4 sessions/config without 'address-family ' > context to use the 'address-family ipv6 unicast' context to add a BGP6 peer > for the first time? Changing the list of advertised address-families will reset the BGP

Re: [c-nsp] Low end cisco switch that supports dot1q tunneling and design question

2010-10-19 Thread Per Carlson
Hi. > Also, can the tunnel terminate on multiple > switches if they are all configured with the same access vlan tag? Yes, but not with out some gotchas. If you have a lot of broadcast traffic, and are running the inner Vlans (C-Vlans) "sparsely meshed" you will have a lot more broadcast traffic

Re: [c-nsp] PIX ipv6 neighbour problem

2010-10-19 Thread Andrew Yourtchenko
Hi Andreas, On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Andreas Mueller wrote: Hello, my PIX515E is running PIX 8.0.4 with multiple contexts. In one of my contexts I would like to have IPv6 connectivity. The Interface is configured as I silently assume but just to verify - no shared interface between the

Re: [c-nsp] PIX ipv6 neighbour problem

2010-10-19 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:02 +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote: > interface GigabitEthernet1 > nameif inside > security-level 100 > ip address 192.168.1.232 255.255.255.0 > ipv6 address :::1::e8/64 > ipv6 nd prefix :::1::/64 no-advertise no-autoconfig > [...] > when I t

Re: [c-nsp] Low end cisco switch that supports dot1q tunneling and design question

2010-10-19 Thread Matt Stone
Depends on what you mean by "low end." You could try looking at the 2960's. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6406/index.html Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "can the tunnel terminate" but if both switches in the same vlan connect using an access port, sure. No Dot1Q (Or ISL) trunk wil

[c-nsp] Using address-family context

2010-10-19 Thread Randy McAnally
Is it safe for existing BGP4 sessions/config without 'address-family ' context to use the 'address-family ipv6 unicast' context to add a BGP6 peer for the first time? Thanks! -- Randy ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://pu

[c-nsp] PIX ipv6 neighbour problem

2010-10-19 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hello, my PIX515E is running PIX 8.0.4 with multiple contexts. In one of my contexts I would like to have IPv6 connectivity. The Interface is configured as follows (anonymized IPv6 address) -- interface: interface GigabitEthernet1 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address 192.16

[c-nsp] Cisco 3750 Reboot Issue

2010-10-19 Thread Erik Fritzler
Has anyone experienced crashes with the 3750-12S switches. We have tried 12.2(44), 12.2(50), 12.2(53), and 12.2(55) to alleviate the issue but no difference. I had read about a cisco bug for a memory leak where enabling ip routing on the switch was a workaround. I have tried this, but no change.

[c-nsp] Low end cisco switch that supports dot1q tunneling and design question

2010-10-19 Thread Jeff
Hi there, Can anyone provide recommendations for a low end cisco switch that provides dot1q tunneling features? Also, can the tunnel terminate on multiple switches if they are all configured with the same access vlan tag? Thanks, Jeff. ___

Re: [c-nsp] need help firewall in urgent

2010-10-19 Thread Ryan West
Assuming your interfaces are named inside and outside, use show ip to verify, the following should work. static (inside,outside) publicip privateip access-list outside-in permit udp any host publicip eq 53 access-group outside-in in interface outside Sent from handheld On Oct 19, 2010, at 8

Re: [c-nsp] vs mac table in 3750 switches

2010-10-19 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:54:14AM +0200, Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland wrote: > L3sw --trunk--- L2sw1 --trunk--- L2sw2 > > It it possible that the L2sw2 switch won't send mac address table updates to > the others switches if src and des mac is located on it self. Classic ethernet switc

Re: [c-nsp] Pica8 - Open Source Cloud Switch

2010-10-19 Thread Lin Pica8
Hello, To have a better overview of a Cloud (or OpenFlow) Switch, I would greatly appreciate to invite you to a further reading of the presentation entitled "FI technologies on cloud computing and trusty networking" from our partner, Chunghwa Telecom (Leading ISP in Taiwan) : http://www.asiafi.ne

[c-nsp] need help firewall in urgent

2010-10-19 Thread Deric Kwok
Hi I got pix501 but doesn't have asdm support How can I configure it as cli to map from private to public and open the port 53 named server to allow access from outside and inside Thank you so much ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] vs mac table in 3750 switches

2010-10-19 Thread sthaug
> L3sw --trunk--- L2sw1 --trunk--- L2sw2 > > It it possible that the L2sw2 switch won't send mac address table updates to > the others switches if src and des mac is located on it self. Switches don't send "mac address table updates" to one another. Switches send Ethernet frames, and *learn* MAC

[c-nsp] vs mac table in 3750 switches

2010-10-19 Thread Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland
Hi all. L3sw --trunk--- L2sw1 --trunk--- L2sw2 It it possible that the L2sw2 switch won't send mac address table updates to the others switches if src and des mac is located on it self. /Arne ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net h

Re: [c-nsp] Books for Nexus Arch

2010-10-19 Thread Lincoln Dale
as well as the books, if you have access to Cisco Networkers/Live material then the NX-OS Software Architecture and Nexus Hardware Architecture session(s) but together by your friendly clueful Cisco folks are likely useful too. there are a few of us who are on this list who have spent countless

[c-nsp] 7600 port-channel trouble

2010-10-19 Thread Sergey Alexanov
Hi Group, Please help: I'm using etherchannell between two 7600 - 2 pair of ports in module 3 and 2 pair in module 4 (6708 cards) I've tried to migrate channell ports on one of router from card in slot 4 to the same card in slot 7 without any success. # sh ethercha 1 port-cha

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Catalyst 3750 IPv6 BGP Support

2010-10-19 Thread Elmar K. Bins
Re Phil, Terry, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk (Phil Mayers) wrote: > We have 3750Gs running IPv6 BGP. This was covered in the archives a while > back (I'm > a bit short on time now or I'd expand on it). You need later software (we're > on > 12.2(52)SE) You will need Advanced IP Services, and BGP/v

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Catalyst 3750 IPv6 BGP Support

2010-10-19 Thread Terry Rupeni (USP)
Thks for that will look into that IOS version. Terry On 10/19/2010 6:53 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 10/19/2010 01:57 AM, Terry Rupeni (USP) wrote: Hi, We had a 3745 running our IPv6 BGP but has finally given up on us. We have a spare Catalyst 3750G. Had a look at this site: http://www.cisco

Re: [c-nsp] L2 Rings

2010-10-19 Thread Manaf Al Oqlah
look into Cisco REP -- From: "Mohammad Khalil" Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 5:06 PM To: Subject: [c-nsp] L2 Rings hi all what is better building a L2 ring using STP or MST ? or building the network using VPLS ?

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Catalyst 3750 IPv6 BGP Support

2010-10-19 Thread Phil Mayers
On 10/19/2010 01:57 AM, Terry Rupeni (USP) wrote: Hi, We had a 3745 running our IPv6 BGP but has finally given up on us. We have a spare Catalyst 3750G. Had a look at this site: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-roadmap.html and states it doesn't. Just want to r

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 ND cache via SNMP

2010-10-19 Thread Phil Mayers
On 10/19/2010 01:03 AM, Michael Sinatra wrote: Is anyone out there polling the IPv6 neighbor discovery cache via SNMP? Previously, yes. I get them via expect/cli now, because the OID sorting required for snmpwalk of that table on 6500s is prohibitively expensive when it gets very large (well