[c-nsp] Source for 10gb SR OM3 cable in orange?

2010-10-21 Thread David Hubbard
Any chance anyone on the list knows of a source for 10 gig multimode OM3 cable in orange instead of the standardized aqua color? Ideally in SC to LC and 30m lengths. Need to connect some 4900M X2 10gb SR modules to UCS fabric extenders with SFP-10G-SR modules, and it needs to be orange cable for

Re: [c-nsp] router 2800 or 3600 or 7xxx

2010-10-21 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Deric Kwok wrote: Are all series router 2800 or 3600 or 7xxx supporting vpdn group? I need it to logon to the ISP It depends on what IOS version/train/feature set you load onto the router. The boxes above are just pieces of hardware. The only difference the hardware rea

[c-nsp] router 2800 or 3600 or 7xxx

2010-10-21 Thread Deric Kwok
Hi Are all series router 2800 or 3600 or 7xxx supporting vpdn group? I need it to logon to the ISP Any comment about it any DSL modem and router connection issue? Thank you for your help ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://pu

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread Tony
--- On Fri, 22/10/10, Chris Wopat wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel > Hooper wrote: > > > > The 7206 doesn't accept anything higher than 1500 on > that interface. > > Some 12.2S trains allow you to up the MTU on 7200 to 1530. > I'm > currently running SB, I'm unsure if SR* can do it or not.

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel Lacey wrote: Isn't 1490 the "magic" MTU for PPPoE? Perhaps. But this is supposed to be a layer 2 connection via ethernet from us to the customer. PPPoE isn't in use. Just some switches and q-in-q in between. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel Lacey
Isn't 1490 the "magic" MTU for PPPoE? |--- | Dan Lacey daniel_p_la...@yahoo.com | PGP Key: 0xFE94668F @ http://pgp.mit.edu or http://keyserver.pgp.com | PGP Key fingerprint: 8A97 2996 266D A21C 0277 54EF 40D5 2B80 FE94 668F |

[c-nsp] How does multicast multipath next-hop-based hashing actually work?

2010-10-21 Thread John Neiberger
We've been having a bear of a time trying to get equitable distributions of traffic over sets of links where the traffic is nearly 100% multicast. We seem to end up with a couple of links that have a lot of S,Gs attached to them and other links that only have a few. Since the traffic rate per strea

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, David Freedman wrote: Problem is the DEC chip found on PA-FE-TX , it has a hard limit of 1530 It's actually the built-in FastEthernet port instead of a port adapter: #show controllers fastEthernet 0/0 Interface FastEthernet0/0 Hardware is DEC21140A PDU (i.e on the wire,

[c-nsp] L2 Long Haul/Transport switch recommendation

2010-10-21 Thread Drew Weaver
Hi everyone, I am looking for a recommendation for a switch to use for L2 transport between two locations. Essentially I will have 4-5 1G ports and they will be carried over a 10G connection using VLANs. My main problem is that in the future I will need more 10G ports and most of the 'fixed c

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Reestablish-"order"

2010-10-21 Thread Artyom Viklenko
21.10.2010 3:52, Mario Iseli пишет: Hi there, I have the problem that the CPU on my router is going mad when my link to an IX gets up again after an interface flap, the router reestablishes all sessions in the same time and then kinda gets in a loop because he begins to drop BGP packets after be

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco OneX module question.

2010-10-21 Thread Jiri Prochazka
Hi Igor, we use SFP+ LR transceivers with OneX (CVR-X2-SFP10G) reductions in our 4900M without problems. There are some caveats regarding to using OneX on 4900M (like you have to wait aprox. two minutes before inserting/removing the reduction, otherwise error with duplicate S/N appears in log.. b

[c-nsp] Cisco OneX module question.

2010-10-21 Thread Igor Kremez
Hello, Did someone tested Cisco OneX module with SFP+ LR or SFP+ ER modules ? We have here Cisco Catalyst 4900M, and i'd like to know is it going to work or no: 4900M <- OneX <- SFP-10G-ER ? I read cisco site about OneX compatible list and there is no LR or ER modules there. -- Best regards

Re: [c-nsp] any program will send SMS message as Network device down and resume

2010-10-21 Thread Chris Gotstein
http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/ On 10/21/2010 1:39 AM, Edward Iong wrote: Dear All, Anyone know what program will send the sms to people as the network device is down and resume as well. Thanks and Regards, Edward __

[c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread Chris Wopat
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel Hooper wrote: > > The 7206 doesn't accept anything higher than 1500 on that interface. Some 12.2S trains allow you to up the MTU on 7200 to 1530. I'm currently running SB, I'm unsure if SR* can do it or not. http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2007-March/03903

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Reestablish-"order"

2010-10-21 Thread Heath Jones
Hi Mario > I have the problem that the CPU on my router is going mad when my link to an > IX gets up again after an interface flap, the router reestablishes all > sessions in the same time and then kinda gets in a loop because he begins to > drop BGP packets after being so busy processing BGP upda

Re: [c-nsp] Redistributing ipv6 static default route into eigrpfailure

2010-10-21 Thread Matthew Huff
Cisco 6509/Sup720/MSFC3 running 12.2(33)SXI4 The only route redistribution we do (at least in our internal core network) is static -> eigrp, so that's why we never have had to modify the default metrics. Again, the only issue to me is that the syntax allowed me to configure "redistribute static

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Reestablish-"order"

2010-10-21 Thread Drew Weaver
Hi, I could be completely wrong (or this could be platform specific) but I believe that some of this can be avoided by making sure that the path MTU is the highest possible. >From what I understand the longer it takes for all of the information to be >received by your router the harder the BGP

Re: [c-nsp] Redistributing ipv6 static default route into eigrpfailure

2010-10-21 Thread Andriy Bilous
It does work this way - in 12.4(24)T1 anyway. I'm curious what hardware/software op's using and why is seed metric required there. R1#sh run int fa0/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 129 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto ipv6 address 2620

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread David Freedman
Problem is the DEC chip found on PA-FE-TX , it has a hard limit of 1530 PDU (i.e on the wire, with headers), IOS prevented you changing the mtu on the interface (which is usually the SDU, i.e without the ethernet frame overhead) because it was so close to the edge, but with advent of "tag-switching

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread Christophe Lucas
Le 20/10/2010 19:42, Antonio Querubin a écrit : A new carrier will be handing us customer connections as q-in-q vlans. However, during our initial network validation we noticed what seem like possible MTU issues. Pings work fine but HTTP connections to various sites is flakey - more so for IPv4

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Christophe Lucas wrote: You could be able to set mtu higher than 1500, so that you can handle q-in-q frames. 1500 is the highest MTU the router will accept for configuration on its FastEthernet interfaces. It doesn't have any GigabitEthernet interfaces. I am interest

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread Christophe Lucas
Le 21/10/2010 11:21, Antonio Querubin a écrit : On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel Hooper wrote: I was under the impression that interfaces handling Q-in-Q needed atleast an MTU of 1504 bytes. The 7206 doesn't accept anything higher than 1500 on that interface. I did some testing with the carrier t

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

2010-10-21 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel Hooper wrote: I was under the impression that interfaces handling Q-in-Q needed atleast an MTU of 1504 bytes. The 7206 doesn't accept anything higher than 1500 on that interface. I did some testing with the carrier today and we found that 1490 was the highest MTU

Re: [c-nsp] IP SLA Scalability

2010-10-21 Thread David Freedman
> > If you're doing this in an MPLS VPN scenario, you might want to make > sure you test your code so it has timestamping for arrival time for > packets even if they are labeled. I ran into this on a 7301 5 years ago, > took 14 months for that TAC case to complete with the answer that > "timestam

Re: [c-nsp] any program will send SMS message as Network device down?and resume

2010-10-21 Thread Alexander Clouter
Edward Iong wrote: > > Anyone know what program will send the sms to people as the network > device is down and resume as well. > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sms+monitor+oss Cheers -- Alexander Clouter .sigmonster says: If God is One, what is bad? -- Charles Manson _