Any chance anyone on the list knows of a source for
10 gig multimode OM3 cable in orange instead of the
standardized aqua color? Ideally in SC to LC and
30m lengths. Need to connect some 4900M X2
10gb SR modules to UCS fabric extenders with
SFP-10G-SR modules, and it needs to be orange cable
for
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Deric Kwok wrote:
Are all series router 2800 or 3600 or 7xxx supporting vpdn group?
I need it to logon to the ISP
It depends on what IOS version/train/feature set you load onto the router.
The boxes above are just pieces of hardware. The only difference the
hardware rea
Hi
Are all series router 2800 or 3600 or 7xxx supporting vpdn group?
I need it to logon to the ISP
Any comment about it any DSL modem and router connection issue?
Thank you for your help
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://pu
--- On Fri, 22/10/10, Chris Wopat wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel
> Hooper wrote:
> >
> > The 7206 doesn't accept anything higher than 1500 on
> that interface.
>
> Some 12.2S trains allow you to up the MTU on 7200 to 1530.
> I'm
> currently running SB, I'm unsure if SR* can do it or not.
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel Lacey wrote:
Isn't 1490 the "magic" MTU for PPPoE?
Perhaps. But this is supposed to be a layer 2 connection via ethernet
from us to the customer. PPPoE isn't in use. Just some switches and
q-in-q in between.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t
Isn't 1490 the "magic" MTU for PPPoE?
|---
| Dan Lacey daniel_p_la...@yahoo.com
| PGP Key: 0xFE94668F @ http://pgp.mit.edu or http://keyserver.pgp.com
| PGP Key fingerprint: 8A97 2996 266D A21C 0277 54EF 40D5 2B80 FE94 668F
|
We've been having a bear of a time trying to get equitable
distributions of traffic over sets of links where the traffic is
nearly 100% multicast. We seem to end up with a couple of links that
have a lot of S,Gs attached to them and other links that only have a
few. Since the traffic rate per strea
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, David Freedman wrote:
Problem is the DEC chip found on PA-FE-TX , it has a hard limit of 1530
It's actually the built-in FastEthernet port instead of a port adapter:
#show controllers fastEthernet 0/0
Interface FastEthernet0/0
Hardware is DEC21140A
PDU (i.e on the wire,
Hi everyone,
I am looking for a recommendation for a switch to use for L2 transport between
two locations.
Essentially I will have 4-5 1G ports and they will be carried over a 10G
connection using VLANs.
My main problem is that in the future I will need more 10G ports and most of
the 'fixed c
21.10.2010 3:52, Mario Iseli пишет:
Hi there,
I have the problem that the CPU on my router is going mad when my link to an
IX gets up again after an interface flap, the router reestablishes all
sessions in the same time and then kinda gets in a loop because he begins to
drop BGP packets after be
Hi Igor,
we use SFP+ LR transceivers with OneX (CVR-X2-SFP10G) reductions in our
4900M without problems.
There are some caveats regarding to using OneX on 4900M (like you have to
wait aprox. two minutes before inserting/removing the reduction, otherwise
error with duplicate S/N appears in log.. b
Hello,
Did someone tested Cisco OneX module with SFP+ LR or SFP+ ER modules ?
We have here Cisco Catalyst 4900M, and i'd like
to know is it going to work or no: 4900M <- OneX <- SFP-10G-ER ?
I read cisco site about OneX compatible list and there is no LR or ER modules
there.
--
Best regards
http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/
On 10/21/2010 1:39 AM, Edward Iong wrote:
Dear All,
Anyone know what program will send the sms to people as the network device is
down and resume as well.
Thanks and Regards,
Edward
__
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel Hooper wrote:
>
> The 7206 doesn't accept anything higher than 1500 on that interface.
Some 12.2S trains allow you to up the MTU on 7200 to 1530. I'm
currently running SB, I'm unsure if SR* can do it or not.
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2007-March/03903
Hi Mario
> I have the problem that the CPU on my router is going mad when my link to an
> IX gets up again after an interface flap, the router reestablishes all
> sessions in the same time and then kinda gets in a loop because he begins to
> drop BGP packets after being so busy processing BGP upda
Cisco 6509/Sup720/MSFC3 running 12.2(33)SXI4
The only route redistribution we do (at least in our internal core network) is
static -> eigrp, so that's why we never have had to modify the default metrics.
Again, the only issue to me is that the syntax allowed me to configure
"redistribute static
Hi,
I could be completely wrong (or this could be platform specific) but I believe
that some of this can be avoided by making sure that the path MTU is the
highest possible.
>From what I understand the longer it takes for all of the information to be
>received by your router the harder the BGP
It does work this way - in 12.4(24)T1 anyway. I'm curious what
hardware/software op's using and why is seed metric required there.
R1#sh run int fa0/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 129 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
ipv6 address 2620
Problem is the DEC chip found on PA-FE-TX , it has a hard limit of 1530
PDU (i.e on the wire, with headers), IOS prevented you changing the mtu
on the interface (which is usually the SDU, i.e without the ethernet
frame overhead) because it was so close to the edge, but with advent of
"tag-switching
Le 20/10/2010 19:42, Antonio Querubin a écrit :
A new carrier will be handing us customer connections as q-in-q vlans.
However, during our initial network validation we noticed what seem like
possible MTU issues. Pings work fine but HTTP connections to various
sites is flakey - more so for IPv4
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Christophe Lucas wrote:
You could be able to set mtu higher than 1500, so that you can handle q-in-q
frames.
1500 is the highest MTU the router will accept for configuration on its
FastEthernet interfaces. It doesn't have any GigabitEthernet interfaces.
I am interest
Le 21/10/2010 11:21, Antonio Querubin a écrit :
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel Hooper wrote:
I was under the impression that interfaces handling Q-in-Q needed
atleast an MTU of 1504 bytes.
The 7206 doesn't accept anything higher than 1500 on that interface.
I did some testing with the carrier t
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel Hooper wrote:
I was under the impression that interfaces handling Q-in-Q needed
atleast an MTU of 1504 bytes.
The 7206 doesn't accept anything higher than 1500 on that interface.
I did some testing with the carrier today and we found that 1490 was the
highest MTU
>
> If you're doing this in an MPLS VPN scenario, you might want to make
> sure you test your code so it has timestamping for arrival time for
> packets even if they are labeled. I ran into this on a 7301 5 years ago,
> took 14 months for that TAC case to complete with the answer that
> "timestam
Edward Iong wrote:
>
> Anyone know what program will send the sms to people as the network
> device is down and resume as well.
>
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sms+monitor+oss
Cheers
--
Alexander Clouter
.sigmonster says: If God is One, what is bad?
-- Charles Manson
_
25 matches
Mail list logo