Hi,
I have upgraded CRS1 to 4.0.1 from 3.6.2. Upgrade worked fine and it is
running 4.0.1. But the issue is I am not able to downgrade it back to 3.6.2
If I am trying to run any install command I see similar output -
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:crs1.BLB(admin)#install commit
Fri Feb 25 03:45:10.181 UTC
Also I can see this log which clearly says no upgrade package is available
but then why it asks to uninstall the upgrade package..
Fri Feb 25 02:26:03.572 UTC
Install operation 396 '(admin) install remove disk1:hfr-upgrade-p.pie-4.0.1
synchronous' started by user 'colt123' via CLI at 02:26:04 UTC
Hi Vikas,
Have the CRS is running on 4.0.1? I mean that the all steps required to
complete the installation have completed? Or you are stuck during
installation...
For downgrade the same procedures are required. However your flash file
system is required to up-grade from FAT 16 to FAT 32 in
I have upgraded CRS1 to 4.0.1 from 3.6.2. Upgrade worked fine and it is
running 4.0.1. But the issue is I am not able to downgrade it back to 3.6.2
I have also checked on the active and inactive files and could not locate
upgrade package on active disk (boot disk). Does anyone has faced
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Vikas Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded CRS1 to 4.0.1 from 3.6.2. Upgrade worked fine and it is
running 4.0.1. But the issue is I am not able to downgrade it back to 3.6.2
I believe the release notes say that when you've finished upgrading to
4.0.x and removed the
Hello,
I would like to connect IPv4-only devices like printers to an IPv6-only
Network and I thought about doing this with NAT-PT on a cisco-device. To
play around with NAT-PT and do some tests I need a cheap device.
According to the cisco document Implementing NAT-PT for IPv6
Hi Farhan,
Yes I did follow all steps and box is up and running 4.0.1 w/o any issue.
Also it has Fat32 partition.
Regards,
Vikas
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Farhan Jaffer bandh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vikas,
Have the CRS is running on 4.0.1? I mean that the all steps required to
Hi Mikael,
There is a process to downgrade, but it is not working for me
http://www.cisco.com/web/Cisco_IOS_XR_Software/pdf/CRS-1_Upgrade_Procedure_3_6_x_4_0_0_to_401-3.pdf
I have 3.6.2 in production network and I want to move to 4.0.1 due to some
really GOOD feature availability. I also think
On 2/25/11 2:17 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I would like to connect IPv4-only devices like printers to an IPv6-only
Network and I thought about doing this with NAT-PT on a cisco-device. To
play around with NAT-PT and do some tests I need a cheap device.
According to the cisco
OK, write this off as another weird thing I want to do and yes I should
be using an ASR and/or multiple layers of hardware but I have a lot of
reasons for not wanting to do either so instead I'm using a
cat6500/vs720, SXI5.
-
ip access-list extended NAT-ACL
permit tcp 10.200.0.0
what about the option of doing a 6to4 relay; we do this with some
low-end c2621xm routers and these work just fine
--
Regards,
Ge Moua
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | OIT - NTS
--
On 2/25/11 7:17 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I would like to connect IPv4-only
Pitor-
Please forgive my ignorance:
I am attempting to get familiar with this myself on a 2811 running 12.4(24)T4 -
but that's IP Base.
I don't even have the option to assign an IPv6 address to an interface.
Do you happen to know which flavor image I need?
Regards,
-Jeff Wojciechowski
The anda is a metro E box. Are you bonding them and then turning
the whole thing into ethernet? Also, how are they bonded? Are you
running ml-ppp between the anda and the cisco?
Doesn't it seem likely that the Anda box is the one doing the bonding?
I see there is a 2212e model that has two
The 2212 DS3\E3 does the bonding and as you have stated the 7200 is
out of the bonding role. Could this have anything to do with the
negotiation between my fiber to copper converter and my router? This
is what my wan provider is telling me.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:02, Mark Kent
Umair;
i think it may be a configurations issue if you do not have the proper commands
entered..
in order to get logs of BFD neighbors status you do need to configure log
adjacency-changes.
log-adjacency-changes [detail]
Example:
Router(config-router)# log-adjacency-changes
Doesn't it seem likely that the Anda box is the one doing the bonding?
I see there is a 2212e model that has two DS3 wan interfaces. I would
expect the fastE interface on this to be facing the cisco7200, which
would take the cisco out of the bonding role.
You can't have them bonded on one
If it's enough / consistent enough packet drops you should be able to see a
diff on the two tunnel routers in sh ip mroute x.x.x.x x.x.x.x count. This
should at least confirm where the drops are happing.
Mcast packet forwarding is not significantly different for being over a GRE
tunnel if we
Just out of curiosity, why not use the ethernet ports on the 7200?
That curiosity was the tip-off that the discussion here was going in a
direction inconsistent with the set-up that Lawrence
cisco-...@theindianmaiden.com has.Not that he has explained it
fully yet, but it seems pretty clear
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Mark Kent m...@noc.mainstreet.net wrote:
Just out of curiosity, why not use the ethernet ports on the 7200?
That curiosity was the tip-off that the discussion here was going in a
direction inconsistent with the set-up that Lawrence
According to the Feature Navigator (which we know is not always
accurate), IPv6 is supported in IPBASE only on 7200 and 7300 routers
and Catalyst 3560/3750, CBS3k blade switches and 6500 Sup32 switches.
On 2811 routers with 12.4T, IPv6 is available in IP Voice, SP
Services, Advanced IP Services,
Thanks!
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: Tóth András [diosbej...@gmail.com]
Received: Friday, 25 Feb 2011, 3:08pm
To: Jeff Wojciechowski [jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.com]
CC: Piotr Wojciechowski [pe...@peper.eu.org];
Cisco PIX/ASA are not routers. For example, you cannot ping from the inside
network to the outside interface, or any other simular type of test.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom
Sutherland
Sent:
Hi Said Izawi,
as i can see that this logging is valid when BFD is used with OSPF. Even with
any dynamic protocol it can be valid.
I have static routing with BFD and it does not logs its changes.
Interface Gi9/17
bfd interval 200 min_rx 200 multiplier 5
no bfd echo
exit
ip route static bfd
any idea if following features are on roadmap for 7600 or ASR 9K
-MPLS-TP
-LDPoRSVP
-ITU Y.1731
-ethernet OAM 802.1ag on 7600 ?
-
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
24 matches
Mail list logo
