On Saturday, September 10, 2011 01:16:31 AM Nick Hilliard
wrote:
> i'm tending to run a local ospf instance on the fw-router
> link and then redistributing from ospf->bgp on the
> next-hop router. Really it would be much better to have
> fw support for bgp, but the ASA is such an enterprise
> bo
On 9/9/11, Persio Pucci wrote:
> Anybody would have a working recipe for routers, specialy 7200? I've
> been trying the ones posted at Cisco (specially the one where you need
> several commands) but the final "activate" command gets an error
> response...
echo "processing $DEV"
echo " delete
Howdy,
I know the age of this router almost makes this an off-topic post =)
I was wondering which version the few remaining folks that are running these
beasts have found to be stable?
Last I heard for straight IOS 12.0(33)S (latest number) was the best, are you
guys finding this still to be t
Show log:
If you are trying to get the current day logs you can use "sh log | inc Sep 9"
(notice the two spaces since there is no zero and day is two digits)
Ssh timeouts:
The command you are looking for is "exec-timeout" this has to be applied to the
individual vty lines.
Osfp ipv6:
Yes th
Hi,
I have some questions that came up while working with Cisco 7600/6500
boxes first weeks.
Maybe you guys have some hints for me.
order of sh log:
Is there a way to show the latest entries first instead of scrolling down
to the end ?
ssh timeouts:
I would like to disable the console timeout fo
ASR numbers would be interesting too.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh Farrelly
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 9:29 PM
To: Jay Nakamura; cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router performance PDF
No, I'm pretty sure you only get the use of 2 of those ports on each with
redundant sup7's
I don¹t have docs to reference as I'm remembering this from a recent
product walkthrough with Cisco
On 9/9/11 8:38 AM, "Edward Beheler" wrote:
>I have a 4510R+E chassis with a sup7, which has 4 SFP+ port
On 09/09/2011 16:51, Colin Whittaker wrote:
> This exact limitation is why everytime I deploy firewalls these days
> there tends to be some form of L3 switch on either side just so I have
> something to run BGP on and just do eBGP multihop across the ASA.
i'm tending to run a local ospf instance o
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 11:33:37AM -0400, Matthew Huff wrote:
> > Just last week I had a customer call due to weird issues with "passive
> > FTP is not working right"... but indeed that might have been an older
> > firmware release.
>
> Hmm, would it happen to have including a NetBSD or OpenB
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:23:59PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > 1) It now does dynamic routing (RIP, OSPF, EIGRP)
>
> ... but still no BGP, which is undoubtly *the* routing protocol that you
> want to use if you don't trust your neighbours (due to much better filtering
> support) - and "firewall
I have a 4510R+E chassis with a sup7, which has 4 SFP+ ports.
If I add another sup7 for redundancy, can I use the 4 SFP+ ports on it, and
have 8 nonredundant SFP+ ports? I've found documentation that you can do that
with a sup 6-E, but the document doesn't have an update for the sup7.
http://w
> ... but still no BGP, which is undoubtly *the* routing protocol that you want
> to use if you don't trust your neighbours (due to much better filtering
> support) - and "firewall environment" is usually all about "not trusting".
I prefer to keep my BGP routing and firewall on separate boxes esp
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 11:17:39AM -0400, Matthew Huff wrote:
> I understand where this comes from, but the ASA is a bit more modern then the
> "PIXen".
>
> 1) It now does dynamic routing (RIP, OSPF, EIGRP)
... but still no BGP, which is undoubtly *the* routing protocol that you
want to use
Gert,
I understand where this comes from, but the ASA is a bit more modern then the
"PIXen".
1) It now does dynamic routing (RIP, OSPF, EIGRP)
2) Nat (as of 8.3+) is now "normal"
3) The inspect feature still has issues but is necessary for many protocols and
is implemented very similar on the Z
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 01:31:06AM -0400, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> I have been wondering lately, what advantages do ASA have over ISR as
> a firewall on the low end? As just one stand alone firewall, what
> features are there for ASA that distinguishes itself? Often, I rather
> have an ISR over
If you don't mind a little bit of perl work. I use a script based on the
Cisco::CopyConfig perl module to TFTP config snippets up to a cisco router or
switch. This is the method I use when I SNMP access but not SSH/Telnet.
http://search.cpan.org/~eug/Cisco-CopyConfig/CopyConfig.pm
Thank You
Da
AFAIK this was only on CatOS for 6500 so not much useful right now.
The private host feature applies vlan tag to the ingress traffic of the
access port (not trunk), the private trunk does ingress traffic tag swap of
multiple vlans coming in via trunk. So, if you have lot of free ports you
might b
holemans --
via 'sh int e trans det' one can scrape the dom information from
the pluggable, assuming the pluggable supports dom.
regards,
q.
-= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =-
On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:24, Holemans Wim wrote:
> Recently we started using CWDM colour
Hi,
can anybody confirm if PVLAN Promiscuous Trunk Port is supported on
the 6500 platform? I know it is supported on the 4500, and that it is
NOT supported on the 3750, but I had the impression it was supported
on the 6500, but it does not accept the command "switchport mode
private-vlan trunk pro
Anybody would have a working recipe for routers, specialy 7200? I've
been trying the ones posted at Cisco (specially the one where you need
several commands) but the final "activate" command gets an error
response...
Enviado via iPhone
Em 08/09/2011, às 18:44, Mike escreveu:
> Hello,
>
>I a
Hi,
I'm trying to establish 40 Gbps redundant cirle using a pair of 6500 and
7600 boxes equipped with X6708 cards as shown below ->
_ _
|| Te1/2 --||///
| core | Te1/1 --| edge-2 |//
| 7600-1 | Te1/5 -Po1--||/
|_ __| Te1/6 -
This link may be what you are looking for.
http://cisco.cluepon.net/index.php/TCB_Recovery
---
Brian Raaen
Network Architect
Zcorum
bra...@zcorum.com
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:40:23PM -0700, Mike wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am sure this can be done and am calling on my fellows to help
> light t
Recently we started using CWDM coloured 10G SFP+ interfaces (smartoptics) on
our campus network (in 4900M with OneX convertors). This works just fine
although Cisco probably will tell us that is not supported...
I'm wondering if someone already did the same thing on nexus 5xxx switches,
especial
Hi,
> snmpset -v 2c -c
> OLD-CISCO-SYS-MIB::netConfigSet. s
>
> And is dotted decimal. And is a path
> relative to you TFTP root. Example:
>
> snmpset -v 2c -c private 192.0.2.10
> OLD-CISCO-SYS-MIB::netConfigSet.192.0.2.50 s new-config.text
yes, have happily used this method to update
24 matches
Mail list logo