Garry,
Do you see the same with mpls ldp targeted-sessions enabled (even for
normal LDP p2p peers) ? At least this is something I would try first ...
Thx,
R.
Hi *,
I've been fighting this problem for quite a while, need some ideas from
the collective intelligence ...
On of our backbone
On Monday, December 12, 2011 03:38:56 PM Garry wrote:
Dec 11 22:59:31: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor [BB1]:0 is
DOWN (Received error notification from peer: Holddown
time expired) Dec 11 22:59:52: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP
Neighbor [BB3]:0 is DOWN (Discovery Hello Hold Timer
expired)
Dec 11
Hi,
So the section of the core you have issues with is like a triangle between the
3 7200s right? -now are the 7200's connected with GigE back-to-back or via
switch ? -and how is the AS1002F connected to this setup please? -is it
connected to BB1 and BB2 to replace BB3?
You said you ran a
Do you have any span sessions enabled?
Dale
Thus spake Matthew Huff (mh...@ox.com) on Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:48:35PM -0500:
We have a multicast data stream (real-time ticker data) that by its nature is
very bursty.
When we connect a source server via gigabit Ethernet to our 6500/sup720
No span sessions enabled.
It definitely looks like a classic microburst output buffer overflow problem,
but with a Sup720 and a 6748 module, I haven't seen this at this volume. Ticker
volume has peeked recently, and that might contribute to it. It appears to
start happening with more than
Note on uRPF on the 6500/7600.
Only works for IPv4 and you need to set strict mode to do what the OP wants.
Strict mode may have unwanted side effects.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
EEM scripts are probably the easiest to do on most Cisco platforms.
BFD falls under the timers category.
I think most people use alerts and manual intervention as this isn't
a problem most people want to live with. Most people try to fix the
error issue in a semi-permanent manner.
Mack
I've always been nervous about automating something like, but to each his
own. There are a few different solution that poll specifically with
performance in mind. You should also be able to set the generic pollers to
trap based on threshold. From there I'd just let a lowly human decide what
to
We're using OER/PfR to achieve this and it works quite well. You can have
routing changes on a wealth of triggers from latency increases to
errors counting up on interfaces. PfR can be configured with a lot of logic
built in so that you don't accidentally blackhole traffic. You can even go
as far
Interesting.. I'm a mostly juniper shop and I haven't done alot of reading
on OER/PIR.
Thanks
2011/12/12 N. Max Pierson nmaxpier...@gmail.com
We're using OER/PfR to achieve this and it works quite well. You can have
routing changes on a wealth of triggers from latency increases to
errors
On 12.12.2011 09:16, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Garry,
Do you see the same with mpls ldp targeted-sessions enabled (even for
normal LDP p2p peers) ? At least this is something I would try first ...
Neither the 7200s nor the ASR support this command ...
Hi all
I have two questions to config ASA and would like you to help.
1/ I open the ssh outside access
ssh 66.77.49.2x 255.255.255.255 outside
but the ASA is showing error as
routing failed to locate next hop for tcp from outside:66.49.4.x/22 to
outside 66.77.49.2x
2/ I try to create nat in
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I have two questions to config ASA and would like you to help.
1/ I open the ssh outside access
ssh 66.77.49.2x 255.255.255.255 outside
but the ASA is showing error as
routing failed to locate next hop
Hi,
On 13 December 2011 06:52, Garry g...@gmx.de wrote:
On 12.12.2011 09:16, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Garry,
Do you see the same with mpls ldp targeted-sessions enabled (even for
normal LDP p2p peers) ? At least this is something I would try first ...
Neither the 7200s nor the ASR support this
Hi All,
I am getting following messages on C6500. Does anybody have any idea ?
%PM_PLATFORM-5-PORTDROP: Port Gi7/2 Dropped packets due to storm control
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
You have configured broadcast storm-control broadcast/multicast level on
the port and you are exceeding whatever limit you set
Kind regards,
Sibbi
Þann 12.12.2011 22:55, skrifaði Farooq Razzaque farooq_...@hotmail.com:
Hi All,
I am getting following messages on C6500. Does anybody have any
Hi oh wise and wonderful list :)
I've got cisco 17xx and 18xx routers in the field with DSL interface (WIC's) in
them.
I'm trying to gain better inside in the quality of the ILEC provided DSL loop
by using the
show dsl interface command.
Any pointers would be much appreciated.
thanks
Hi Deric--
To SSH to the outside interface of the ASA, you need to permit SSH by IP
address.
The configuration statement ssh 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.255 outside
permits SSH to the IP address on the outside interface of the ASA from the
IP address 1.2.3.4.
Also, make sure that you have
Hi All,
Has anyone run into issues with adding new vlans to a VPC for HP blades? I have
just provisioned a new network to pump down to my HP blades but have run into
issues on the HP farm.
Currently have 12 chassis spread over 2 sites with 2 new networks (1 per site)
not working at all at one
19 matches
Mail list logo
