Dan,
Another option is to use the PfR NAT integration. The idea is that PfR will
actively monitor the traffic and move subnet reachabilty around to try to even
out the traffic. For existing NATed flows, PfR will preserve the stickiness on
the established path.
This functionality is built into the linux kernel these days by way of the
netem module:
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Netem
There is a live-cd application of a wan emulator available on the cisco website:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/fe_util (wan bridge)
Regards,
--
Hi Dale,
The output for Flexible NetFlow has the L4 ports in decimal format, eg:
LX-7301-10#show flow monitor nf-original-with-dstIntKey cac format table | in
102.2|TOS
INTF OUTPUT IP TOS IP PROT IPV4 SRC ADDR IPV4 DST ADDR TRNS SRC PORT TRNS
DST PORT INTF INPUT
Fa1/10x00
Dimitry,
The asr has support for traditional netflow as well as nf v9 exports. If it is
missing from the datasheet it is an oversight as the asr has very good scale
support for nf.
--Aamer
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kiselev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04,
There are some techniques that one can use to scale something like this. One
could use a UDP loadbalancer to a complex for collectors to distribute the
load.
The cisco NFC does support this model with hiearchrial collectors, as other
collector implementations do as well. The one thing you
Systems, cisco Systems
From: Kim Onnel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 6:17 AM
To: Masood Ahmad Shah
Cc: Aamer Akhter (aakhter); Saku Ytti; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] tcpdump on ios?
Have you taken a look at IOS XR ? it has stuff similar to the commit
Hi Folks,
It really depends on what the intent is. If the intent is to track flows
transiting the router, then these debug commands are (IMHO) not the best way.
Eg, a problem with debug cef is going to be not all packets are CEF switched
(eg PBR, MPLS). These are really meant to troubleshoot
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 3:43 PM
To: Aamer Akhter (aakhter)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aamer Akhter (aakhter) wrote:
Veranda,
Have you looked at PfR
Correct. BFD doesn't work in a VRF. It's annoying.
BFD in a VRF works today on the GSR (12.0S) in the newer releases.
It will work in future releases on the different platforms.
Regards,
--
Aamer Akhter / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ent Commercial Systems, cisco Systems
-Original Message-
