Re: [c-nsp] SSH issue

Any restrictions in the line vty config? Op 23-2-2012 14:56, Chris Lane schreef: running a 7600 with s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH7 actually just installed device, added crypto key rsa ~ all normal here, noting unusual to report. but, oddly this is what i am seeing when i try and

Re: [c-nsp] Router recommendation for small ISP

ASR 1001 has several options as it has one general use single height SPA slot and next to that an OPTIONAL daughterboard with the interfaces mentioned. (to bad we won't need POS ;)) Op 17-2-2011 8:43, Rens schreef: It's not even that old. PS: you can also install SPA in asr1001 no?

Re: [c-nsp] Tool To Backup Configurations

Rancid Op 4-1-2011 9:57, Righa Shake schreef: Hi, Am looking for a tool that i can use to backup Cisco configurations with ease. The tool could be opensource or commercial. Regards, Righa Shake ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Enhanced Packet Capture in IOS (EPC)

The only time i wanted to use it was on our ASR1004 wich didn't support it :) (and that was for troubleshooting input errors on the interface so i doubt those would have shown up (was recieving packets in an unconfigured vlan)) Op 1-9-2010 21:35, Rodney Dunn schreef: Yep! Here is the quick

[c-nsp] ASR1000 Series PPPoA

Hi all, Anyone heard anything on PPPoA on the ASR 1000 series yet? As far as i know it isn't supported (yet?) but i might be wrong :) PPPoA would make it a superb replacement for our 720X series Kind regards, Erik Versaevel ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] PXE not working on Cat2948

Sounds like spanning-tree port enable delay, issue try using spanning-tree portfast on the PXE client port Op 8-1-2010 14:04, Jens Neu schreef: Der all, I have a Catalyst 2948G which seems to keep PXE boot from working properly. This one Cat2948 is the only Layer 2 device between the

Re: [c-nsp] 7500 for DSL aggregation - RSP memory error?

Only drawback on the ASR1k platform is the lack of PPPoA support, otherwise we would have happely migrated away from our 7200/1G's We got 2 ASR1004's for ethernet aggregation and they're doing just fine for that :) If you *insist* on having route-processor redundancy (what about interface

Re: [c-nsp] round-trip differences towards google

Is there a difference when you traceroute with different source ip's ? Rens schreef: I expect the return routing to be the same as for all my IP addresses since they are all advertised in the same way. I guess google doesn't handle them the same way? -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] Problem with config for 7206 acting as a lns

You need to increment the sequence number: lcp:interface-config#1=service-policy output 160 lcp:interface-config#2=service-policy input 2560 also make sure the service policy referred to are in you configuration :) Samantha (Regional Connect) schreef: Hi I have the radius issuing the

Re: [c-nsp] Real life and worst-case performance of Cisco and Juniper?

Hi Rick, We have been in a similar situation last year. Originaly we had 7206 VXR NPE-G1's as both access routers and core routers, however maintaining a full bgp table on the core routers became a bit to much for the 7206's and we wanted more interfaces for our access network (and needed to

Re: [c-nsp] Small routing issue

Todd, Try pinging/tracing with the correct source adress, ping 74.125.45.100 source fa 0/0 that would originate packets with the public source adress on that interface instead of the RFC1918 ip you're using at the moment. (default is to use the IP adress on the interface the packet leaves)

Re: [c-nsp] How to add new rule in the same access-list

Garry schreef: Seth Mattinen wrote: Deric Kwok wrote: Hi I have old rule in the switch but don't know how to add new rule in the same access-list When I add new deny rule, it will be put at the end of the access-list If I remove the access-list 140, I have to re-type all lines again.

Re: [c-nsp] backup server required for ISP .

I'm facing something similar, for backup of internet connected equipment we use a inhouse build perl script which saves the output of show running-config/show startup-config. Challenge is config backup for devices inside a VRF :) Erik Versaevel ___

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN Problem - EoS conflict

From RFC 3032: iv. A value of 3 represents the Implicit NULL Label. This is a label that an LSR may assign and distribute, but which never actually appears in the encapsulation. When an LSR would otherwise replace the label at the top of the

Re: [c-nsp] 7602VXR NPE-G1

E. Versaevel schreef: Daniel Roesen schreef: On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:41:48PM +0100, E. Versaevel wrote: I've also been looking into the ASR 1000 series as a replacement/expansion. However it doesn't seem to support PPPoA, that's one major show stopper for us. That's announced for RLS3

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7206 - High CPU Utilization

Hi Spencer, All encryption is done in software on the CPU (no dedicated encryption hardware) unless you have a special module for that. You config isn't exactly minimal (ie, gathering flow statistics NAT also eats CPU), also notice that you are referring to 5 minute averages on the bandwidth,

Re: [c-nsp] Utilization of a line card (7606)

Hi Roddy, router#remote command module 1 show proc cpu sort CPU utilization for five seconds: 4%/0%; one minute: 4%; five minutes: 4% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 121 163451056 328079970498 4.39% 4.32% 4.33% 0 fw_lcp process 2

[c-nsp] 7602VXR NPE-G1

Hello, I've got a 7206VXR with NPE-G1 configured for PPPoA termination, we recieve the VC's over an STM-1 and terminate them into various vrf's (for VPN) or into the global routing table (for internet). We are currently experiencing high cpu load (80%) and some slow CLI access. We have about