[yeah, OT and should be on NANOG or similar, but this will more likely
get you real answers, sadly.]
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 02:42:56PM -0700, Scott Voll wrote:
For those of you working in an enterprise, company, agency, etc. Do you
have a standard (network) maintenance windows?
If so,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 09:33:19PM -0800, Eric Rosenberry wrote:
I am scratching my head here wondering if I have run into a Cisco bug, or
somehow intended weird behavior...
Bug. I encountered less of them with foo.0/32 than foo.255/32, but
an uphill battle to them to DTRT.
--
RSUC
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:08:03PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
I've been in the habit of using communities to anchor and announce
prefixes into BGP for years and I think my ways are somewhat dated.
I'm looking for a bit of a refresh. Wondering if anyone here has
any thoughts ;)
[snip]
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:12:22PM +1000, Andy Saykao wrote:
Thanks for the reply guys.
What I'm trying to achieve is to monitor the bandwidth utilization on
our Internet link. So for example we want to know how much bandwidth is
being utilized by our customers so we can say ah huh out of
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:49:32AM -0400, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, jack daniels wrote:
Hi all ,
I have got a project for an ISP ( also LDP configured ) runnning OSPF to
migrate to IS-IS.
I was planning to runnn dual IGP , as ospf with AD 110 and ISIS with AD
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:05:17PM -0400, Adam Greene wrote:
Hi,
We run BGP to our upstream providers and OSPF on our local backbone.
We have a customer who will be multihomed and needs us to advertise his IP
blocks to us via BGP.
My question is how best to propagate his AS-PATH
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:22:04PM +0100, Alasdair McWilliam wrote:
[snip]
Is there any way around this or is the only option to request a second ASN?
Among the give you enough rope options, neighbor allowas-in;
use with caution. There are many other options, including to build
tunnels
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:14:08PM +0100, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Ozar wrote:
I am starting to see random BGP neighbor messages from multiple neighbors
on
different boxes.
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor X.X.X.X 3/11 (invalid or
corrupt
AS path) 516 bytes
[snip]
No, it is
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Pelle wrote:
Hi.
I don't have an answer to your question, but a thought about dampening.
In theory, it's supposed to work, but thought it might be better to
ask for advice and things to watch out for before deploying in the
real world.
BGP
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:04:29AM -0400, Adam Greene wrote:
Besides documenting config changes, can rancid perform a tftp backup of
router / switch startup configs, or integrate with some other software to
pull down the config file if a change is detected?
Lots of folks trigger rancid runs
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 04:14:33PM +0100, Alex Howells wrote:
That template makes fairly extensive use of the 'archive' command but
some older IOS doesn't include that functionality; I've also seen/heard
RANCID being deployed
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 04:16:16PM -0400, David Prall wrote:
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shaun R.
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:51 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Route Optimization/Control Options?
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 03:55:34PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At 08:15 AM 23-12-07 -0500, Eric Van Tol wrote:
Thanks. I might HTML later this week unless someone else has it online
someplace.
An old one of mine is up at
http://www.gweep.net/~crimson/networks/netblocks.html
...or you
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 05:39:07PM -0800, virendra rode // wrote:
[snip]
In order to distribute traffic (load-sharing) across two links I'm
looking at enabling equal cost traffic (per-packet load sharing) going
out both serial links as their data processing is overloading one link.
The equal
From joe and stephen's nanog tutorial
(http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0210/abley.html):
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/toolmakers/mktop.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/toolmakers/top2dot.tar.gz
I'm a big fan of forcing provisioning/operational acceptance through
the same system that creates/is part of your
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 03:51:00PM +0800, Nick Kraal wrote:
[snip]
You didn't indicate what types of devices, and specifically
the media. A very good design rule for generally reducing
any encapsulation problems is to be sure that your WAN links
are running significantly higher MTU than your
16 matches
Mail list logo
