On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Raise your hand if you, like me, just entered Jason Mishka Bluecat or
similar into your favorite search engine and had never read or had long
forgotten the five-month-old original post.
*hand raised* :)
I do wonder if it's a competitor who is being
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Drew Weaver wrote:
Ideally, I would like to be able to assign the management device a RFC
1918 IP, have the actual server be on a different subnet altogether but
use a shared port. I know that BMCs generally can use VLAN tagging, but
I'm really not sure how I can do all of
We're having some really odd issues with a pair of 6500's. We know that
our TCAM table is overflowed, but it's worked fine up until now (new pair
of SUP720-10GE's on order, but not here yet, of course.)
Here's the TCAM errors we are getting, which are pretty typical:
Dec 3 10:29:18:
cheap (ie, free), pretty
easy to install, and works great. ;)
| nate carlson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981
of the worst Engrish I've ever seen
from Cisco.. yikes.
| nate carlson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981
?
| nate carlson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981
it.
Got'cha.
You could always use NAC to ensure users are on the network they are
supposed to be on, and then not require NAC on a 'guest network' users
tend to not like that too much, however. ;)
| nate carlson | [EMAIL
, never tried it with less than 256).
It's worth noting that it's dirt cheap to get the 2801 up to 384mb.
http://www.natecarlson.com/blog/2007/07/17/cisco-2801s-use-standard-laptop-memory/
| nate carlson | [EMAIL PROTECTED
-type shared
channel-group 1 mode desirable
!
| nate carlson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
Add them to the port channel interface NOT the physical ports.
Yeah, got an off-list reply saying the same thing - we will give that a
shot.
Appreciate it!
| nate carlson
Can you help a dead-tired engineer? ;)
We've got an IP pon our network that needs to use a different route out to
the world, but for lots of reasons, we can't change it on the device
itself.. it's currently pointed at an interface on a 6509. From what I
recall, we can set up PBR to say that
know if that's possible?
Definitely not possible (tried it) and not on the road map.
Bummer - thanks for the confirmation!
| nate carlson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor
We're currently using a AS5300 for dial-in services, and would like to
move this over to a 3825 that we have sitting mainly idle. It looks like
the PVDM2-24DM would provide the digital modems we need; however, we
already have a VWIC2-2MFT-T1 installed in the 3825, and would like to use
that if
to prevent one of your networks from reaching
another one of your networks, correct?
Time to write an ACL! :)
| nate carlson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor village of its idiot
, or other
recommendations? Max bandwidth would probably be ~40mbit.
Thanks for any advice!
| nate carlson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981
15 matches
Mail list logo
