Ditto. I didn't know you could do this either. That's why I love mailing
lists. They're a massive pool of collective experience. :)
Brocade has an interesting way of handling this as well. I had always
wondered why (until now) Cisco didn't have an equivalent. On Brocade you
can do:
(type 3 code 10) messages to
Cisco router.
regards,
Martin
2013/5/21, Vinny Abello vi...@abellohome.net:
On , c...@marenda.net wrote:
Hi,
I have an IPsec tunnel between Cisco 1841 and ZyXEL routers over
public
Internet. I do not have access to ZyXEL router. According
On , c...@marenda.net wrote:
Hi,
I have an IPsec tunnel between Cisco 1841 and ZyXEL routers over
public
Internet. I do not have access to ZyXEL router. According to show
crypto session IPsec tunnel is up and active. This IPsec tunnel
connects 192.168.157.0/24 and 192.168.136.0/24 networks
On 6/25/2012 11:34 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Vinny Abello wrote:
I recently just received a few ASR-9001 routers and was surprised to find
they did not come with the required IOS-XR 4.2.1 image at all and are
effectively paperweights.
I had observed
Hello,
I recently just received a few ASR-9001 routers and was surprised to find they
did not come with the required IOS-XR 4.2.1 image at all and are effectively
paperweights. As far as I've determined, it seems like there might have been an
error in the ordering process which omitted this.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alternately, you can also change the default behavior of the ASA by issuing:
no sysopt connection permit-vpn
This will cause all traffic from VPN tunnels to be subject to the access-lists
on the ingress interface. Note that Cisco recommends using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/8/2012 8:58 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:40:16AM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
I'm going through feature navigator looking for compatibility and it says
that port based EoMPLS is available in the 12.2SXF train, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What kind of performance do you see if you temporarily remove the ip
access-group and ip inspect commands from the interface? (Sorry if you already
did this. I might have missed some posts). What's configured on the interface
connected to the
To add to Chuck's questions:
Can you post your FastEthernet0/1 configuration? What exactly is this interface
plugged into?
What IOS version are you running?
I think you said this works fine with a computer connected directly to the
provider, but just out of curiosity what other device is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike,
I don't believe Verizon FiOS uses compression. Neither would the Windows
machine plugged directly into the hand off, so it would not compress or
decompress data in communicating with Verizon's hardware. Compression of an
entire link is CPU
-
From: Vinny Abello [mailto:vi...@abellohome.net]
Sent: 24 November 2011 19:17
To: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
Cc: Nick Ryce; Eric Morin; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR BGP
On 11/24/2011 11:04 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
I require the specific to be from IGP
On 11/24/2011 11:04 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
I require the specific to be from IGP.
I have a funny feeling all I need to do is redistribute OSPF into BGP
then
use the aggregate-address as-set summary-only
yes, and it looks you can limit the OSPF redistribution to a few (a
Of Vinny Abello
Sent: lundi 18 juillet 2011 5:58
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 1841 dumps to rommon only on power failure
Got an interesting problem I thought someone else might have
experienced. I have an 1841 in my home that I've used for a while.
Recently
...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vinny Abello
Sent: lundi 18 juillet 2011 5:58
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 1841 dumps to rommon only on power failure
Got
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/19/2011 11:31 AM, Marty Adkins wrote:
On 7/17/2011 11:58:11 PM Vinny Abello vi...@abellohome.net wrote:
Got an interesting problem I thought someone else might have
experienced. I have an 1841 in my home that I've used for a while
Got an interesting problem I thought someone else might have
experienced. I have an 1841 in my home that I've used for a while.
Recently (probably within the past year) I noticed that when it looses
power, the next time it powers on it doesn't boot properly and just gets
dumped to rommon. This
I've done something extremely similar with the Transition Networks
TN-GLC-ZX-SM-15 which is rated for ~150km and had excellent success.
This was going over about a 115km span, but due to expected loss at each
junction and the optical properties of the fiber given to me, the
ZX-SM-15 was much
I consider that the same platform. ;)
-Vinny
On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:25 AM, LM asturlui...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the same in 7600
El 15/06/11 18:46, vinny_abe...@dell.com escribió:
Oh yuck, really?? Is this a limitation of the platform?
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From:
Check for something like TCP Offload on the machine where you are seeing this
problem. This can often interfere with things and result in incorrect TCP
checksums in packet captures. Outside of that, do you have an MTU smaller than
1500 bytes anywhere you know of in the network? It could be
Works great for me on OS X 10.5.5... also on a MBP. No stability problems at
all. Now if I could get the VPN client to add the domain suffix to my search
order each time I connect, it would be perfect. Has anyone seen that work on OS
X?
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
From: Mark Tinka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 9:36 PM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: Ryan Wilkins; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN Client Causes Mac OS X Crash
On Thursday 04 December 2008 07:06:13 Vinny Abello wrote:
Works great for me on OS X 10.5.5... also
I've also seen directed broadcast needed for remote management of some thin
client platforms across subnets.
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Gauthier
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 9:55 AM
To:
The 877 is for ADSL. Last I knew, I thought Covad's DSLAMs only did SDSL. What
Netopia model does it work with? I can confirm if the 877 is incompatible if
you let me know what does work with it.
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Ramz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 8:20 AM
To: Vinny Abello; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] NAT/ACL options in a PIX
Vinny,
#thanks for the reply. So, host 5.6.7.8 wants to access that internal
#host
Correct, you are doing NAT as a straight 1 to 1 translation for traffic. Using
PAT, you can specify either TCP or UDP traffic and the outside and inside port
numbers. This is still accomplished with the static statement. You'll still
need the access-list entry as well unless you have another
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mateusz Blaszczyk
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 4:26 PM
To: Daniel D Jones
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ADSL weirdness
Daniel,
interface Dialer1
mtu 1492
There probably is an OID (check the ASA MIB from Cisco), but the ASA includes
ASDM which will show you concurrent connections (as well as memory, cpu, and
bandwidth load) in realtime.
You can also just do show conn count while logged in.
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 1:42 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Migration with ISIS (was Route Reflector
Design)
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Vinny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peder @ NetworkOblivion
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 8:28 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cisco-NSP Mailing List
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
What!? The original PIX
-Original Message-
From: Sam Stickland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 10:58 AM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: Peder @ NetworkOblivion; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cisco-NSP
Mailing List
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
Vinny Abello wrote:
Also, minus
-Original Message-
From: Sam Stickland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 10:58 AM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: Peder @ NetworkOblivion; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cisco-NSP
Mailing List
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
Vinny Abello wrote:
Also, minus
I hate replying to my own post, but I just discovered that the default value of
500 milliseconds on unreachables DF also breaks PMTU discovery. The only way it
works is if it's completely turned off with no ip icmp rate-limit unreachables
DF.
Vinny Abello wrote:
Hello Cisco fans,
I've been
... but
whatever.
You may also want to pose the same question in cisco-nas list. I don't know how
active it is, but someone there may have better answers than I.
Good luck!
--
Vinny Abello
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(973)940-6100 (NOC)
PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:17 PM, Jefri Abdullah wrote:
Dear List,
I've two routers running ibgp as routing protocol, some how, one of
these router should advertise network 0.0.0.0 (via default-information
network statement) to another ebgp peer. But the ibgp peer should deny
to receive this
of this. The Foundry only supports version 1 and until recent
code, Cisco only supports version 0.
--
Vinny Abello
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(973)940-6100 (NOC)
PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A
Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection
http
Yep, we plan on looking at this release. :)
Robert Crowe wrote:
6500 support version 1 in SXH.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vinny Abello
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:35 PM
To: Robert Boyle
Cc: cisco-nsp
/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Vinny Abello
Network Engineer
Server Management
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(973)300-9211 x
Mark Tinka wrote:
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 02:06, Vinny Abello wrote:
I know we're up to SB9 last I
checked, but I haven't tested that yet. On SB6, when I
started configuring mpls ip and mpls traffic-eng
tunnels on interfaces with other routers and the LDP
adjacency comes up, I
.
Thanks!
--
Vinny Abello
Network Engineer
Server Management
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(973)300-9211 x 125
(973)940-6125 (Direct)
PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A
Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection
http://www.tellurian.com (888)TELLURIAN
Courage
to ISIS migration... maybe minus the ip fast-convergence.
Our (Cisco) platforms are generally Cat6500 12.2(18)SXF and 7206
12.2(28)SB builds.
--
Vinny Abello
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(973)940-6100
PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A
Tellurian
40 matches
Mail list logo
