I also like to use capture on each interface in and out to see where
the issue is.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge
Evangelista
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:04 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM v2.3
It's off topic but I'm hoping someone can give a little input.
We are looking for a Project Management suite. It needs to be able to:
* Use multiple people on a single project.
* Log time for each person on the project.
* Be able to run multiple projects at the same
What are you going to use for a switch? You can get a 2811 with the PoE switch
module, Unity Express, and CME with a 2-FXO VIC. This will provide your FXO
port for your land line and everything you would need.
With that all being said, not sure on ship date, cisco is coming out with a all
in
Does cisco have a 64 bit VPN Client yet? If not, any idea when they
will have one?
Scott
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Not the SSL client but the IPSEC client.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Ben D. Kusa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 2:08 PM
To: Voll, Scott; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] VPN client 64 bit
Anyconnect works for x64 also for x64 vista
Of Gert Doering
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 2:20 PM
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: Voll, Scott; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; 'Mikael Abrahamsson'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VTY locks on show commands
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 06:06:34PM +0200, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
If the limit is not 1500, then something
Do you have a live interface in vlan 630? A port on the switch
configured as vlan 630 that is up and up.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joann Deng
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 5:04 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject:
50 miles east..was trying not to drive ;-)
From: heh heh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 1:50 PM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VTY locks on show commands
can you get to the console
I have two ISP running BGP. I have just installed a Third and all seems
to be working.
We are going to terminate one of the former ISP BGP sessions. Is there
a way to do this gracefully without causing all sorts of routing issues?
I'm thinking shutting down the Gig port is not my best
!
!
!
-Original Message-
From: Scott Granados [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:57 AM
To: Voll, Scott; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPSec tunnel up but no Traffic
Can you post the related parts of the configs you're using. I recently
went
down
-REAP.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dan; cisco-nsp
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] wireless lan controller and remote ap
Unless you have a bunch of AP's at each site $$$ wise it
doesn't
I was told the same thing.. but Just tell TAC you only have 8 per
site =)
-Original Message-
From: Pickett, McLean (OCTO) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:48 AM
To: Voll, Scott; Dan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp
Your right I don't want to traverse the WAN twice either but how
much traffic is really going across twice. Is it enough to worry about?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:44 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 10:23 AM
To: Voll, Scott; Dan; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] wireless lan controller and remote ap
With all due respect, what does a firewall have to do with this?
Are you treating
Unless you have a bunch of AP's at each site $$$ wise it
doesn't make sense to spend the dollars for controllers at each site
IMHO.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 3:13 PM
To: 'Dan';
To add. with cooling create hot and cold isles.
Over build everything. Power, Cooling, wiring,
Don't make any roof penetrations above your Data center.
Make sure you have high ceilings.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Don't use subnet mask.. need to use Wildcard.
IE
access-list 100 permit ip host xxx.xxx.xxx.64 yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy 0.0.0.63
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:37 AM
To:
Stateful inspection.
If you just want a FW you would not need the IDSM. Depending on
application you might also want the IDSM. (depends)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tohill
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 1:40 AM
To:
What kind of video system? Does it mark packets with DSCP / IP Prec by
default?
My guess is that if your going to make a separate video vlan, you will
have to assign the port to the video vlan manually. ( more Management
:-(
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What version of FWSM matches up with the Pix / ASA 7.2 code train?
Thanks
Scott
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Is your laptop tagging ISL? Unless a trunk is setup between the router
and switch and your configured for ISL over that trunk and tag your port
the Laptop is plugged into you won't be able to ping it.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Why add complexity. I'd just trunk.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Backholm
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:38 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Layer 3 Core
Currently where I work we run a complete
22 matches
Mail list logo
