Anyone tried or using cisco diameter routing agent?
How mature is this solution compared to other brands?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
To: cisco-nsp NSP cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Infra DDOS Protection
On Sep 21, 2012, at 1:44 PM, ar wrote:
What's the accuracy and response time of netflow in ddos detection?
Answering this question separately, it works quite
Hi.
I am trying to setup a dynamic IPSEC remote access for MPLS VPNs.
Setup is;
- one 7200 as VPN concentrator
- mulitple remote CPE connected via 3G Internet doing IPSEC with the
concentrator
Objective is:
- Remote CPE LAN to another remote CPE LAN traffic
My config is a single
...@frontiernetworks.ca
To: Randy randy_94...@yahoo.com; cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; ar
ar_...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] IPSEC Hub and Spoke - Single crypto profile, Multiple
dynamic-map
If your match acl permits the traffic you just need reverse route
Does
SPA-5X1GE-V2 on SIP-600 (7600) support L2/L3 ether-channel?
URL below only mentioned about the 10-Port GE SPA.
It did not mention about 5-Port GE SPA.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/module_installation_and_configuration_guides_chapter09186a0080523f3c.html#wp1181598
255.255.255.255
ip vrf VRF-C
rd 100:109
route-target export 100:109
route-target import 100:109
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com; cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Tim Warnock tim...@timoid.org
Sent: Saturday, June
commands on the LNS.
Then tell radius to use that VRF for that specific account.
Did I missed anything?
From: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 10:53 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] Fw: LNS Error %VPDN-3
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com; Tim Warnock tim...@timoid.org
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 7:19 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] LNS Error %VPDN-3-NORESOURCE:
I tried SRE6 already.
I got the same error.
Unfortunately I dont have any TAC support for this box.
Could
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
To: Brian Turnbow b.turn...@twt.it; ar ar_...@yahoo.com; Tim Warnock
tim...@timoid.org
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:04 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] LNS Error %VPDN-3-NORESOURCE:
I tried
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
To: Brian Turnbow b.turn...@twt.it; ar ar_...@yahoo.com; Tim Warnock
tim...@timoid.org
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:04 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] LNS Error %VPDN-3-NORESOURCE:
I tried
Hi.
I am working on a new LNS on our network.
I am getting an error below
I have the following config:
vpdn-group 1
accept-dialin
protocol l2tp
virtual-template 1
terminate-from hostname LAC
source-ip x.x.x.x
local name LNS1
lcp renegotiation on-mismatch
l2tp tunnel password test
,
and provide
the representative with the gathered information.
From: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 3:14 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] LNS Error %VPDN-3-NORESOURCE:
Hi.
I am working on a new LNS on our network.
I am
Process
From: Tim Warnock tim...@timoid.org
To: 'ar' ar_...@yahoo.com; 'cisco-nsp' cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 7:56 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] LNS Error %VPDN-3-NORESOURCE:
I used cisco output interpreter and got the following
Yup. I am actually downloading SRE6 as of the moment
I'll load this tom and will send an update.
Thank you Tim.
From: Tim Warnock tim...@timoid.org
To: 'ar' ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: 'cisco-nsp' cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 8:41 PM
is Authentication
failure
From: Tim Warnock tim...@timoid.org
To: 'ar' ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: 'cisco-nsp' cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 10:41 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] LNS Error %VPDN-3-NORESOURCE:
-Original Message-
From: ar
Thanks Gert.
I'll try this.
Thanks
From: Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2012 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] multiple aaa group for multiple LNS vpdn-group
Hi,
On Thu
Hi.
I have one LNS.
I have also two different radius servers.
One old, and one new which I am trying to migrate on.
Is it possible to have different AAA config on my LNS such that,
vpdn-group1 is using radius server 1 for my old LAC access network
I'll then create vpnd-group2 for my new
My requirements are:
- MPLS PE functionality
- LNS/L2TP with IP TOS Reflection
I am eyeing the following:
12.4.24T7(ED)
c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T7.bin
or
12.2.33 SRE6
c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE6.bin
Both released March2012.
Or should I go up to 15.1?
thanks
.
Please change the Image Name and search again. Thank you.
From: Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7206VXR NPE-G2 IOS
I'd probalby go
Hi.
Thanks again for the EOL notice.
Yes I am referring to Cisco feature navigator.
I searched by image and put in c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.151-4.M4.bin
No luck.
From: Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco
Hi Tom.
Yes, we'll surely do the LAC-LNS balancing.
I'm just exploring in using HSRP for redundancy.
Getting some ideas from you guys if this is advisable.
From: Tom Storey t...@snnap.net
To: Christophe LUCAS christo...@clucas.fr
Cc: ar ar_...@yahoo.com; cisco
Hi Guys.
Part of building our new 7200 PE, im researching on the best updated IOS for
this.
Anyone using Release 15?
Or better stay with the latest Release 12?
thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Try to trust dscp/cos value of incoming packets of the access port.
From: ML m...@kenweb.org
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, May 6, 2012 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3400 DSCP EF bits stripped.
On 5/4/2012 7:07 PM, Lee Starnes wrote:
Hello
7206 Version 12.2(31)SB16
7206 Version 12.2(31)SB14
Any suggestion on best/updated 7200 IOS for L2TP/MPLS functionality?
From: Steve McCrory smccr...@gcicom.net
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com; sledge...@gmail.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent
(avayner) avay...@cisco.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com; cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, May 4, 2012 12:42 AM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 7206 LNS/L2TP using HSRP
With HSRP, every time you do a failover, all sessions would drop, and have to
be reestablished.
Using the redundancy model, you
...@gcicom.net
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com; Steve McCrory smccr...@gcicom.net;
sledge...@gmail.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, May 4, 2012 7:49 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] L2TP IP TOS Reflect
Hi,
I found the bug below but have struggled to find the previous information
relating
Guys,
I'm planning to terminate L2TP to LNS using HSRP.
So there will be LNS redundancy.
Is this possible?
I've read that terminating L2TP to the HSRP address has some issues.
Or better to use multiple initiate-to commands on the LAC?
Any other options for fail-over/redundancy?
thanks
Anyone tried this in l2tp?
ip tos reflect seems to be not working
sample config:vpdn-group 1
accept-dialin
protocol l2tp
virtual-template 1
terminate-from hostname althea
local name bertha
l2tp ip tos reflect
any workarounds?
___
cisco-nsp
Thanks Richard.
This is at the LAC level right?
What about at LNS for the inbound (Client download) traffic?
From: Richard Clayton sledge...@gmail.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 6:11 PM
Subject
(avayner) avay...@cisco.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com; cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 7:09 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 7206 LNS/L2TP using HSRP
Better use discrete IP addresses. Loopbacks are mostly recommended.
On your LAC you can specify multiple IPs (that can come
...@gmail.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 LNS - QOS/shaper on interface facing LAC
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:29 AM, ar ar_...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have 7200 acting as LNS.
I have multiple QOS
Yeah.
Though Im not sure why it's working on the ME-3400G-2CS-A variant.
From: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists li...@hojmark.org
To: 'ar' ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: 'cisco-nsp' cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3400
-line
to you.
--
Regards,
Ge Moua University of Minnesota Alumnus
Email: moua0...@umn.edu --
On 2/15/12 3:07 AM, ar wrote:
Hi Ge.
Thanks for your response.
What platform did you use? 7200 also?
Can you share your template?
I'll try the following:
-site to site
- remote access using
Hi Guys.
I am using GRE on ME3400 with my Core 7600.
I am not sure why I cant ping outside the GRE tunnel even though routing is
correct already.
I tried doing a debug ip packet and Im getting the output below;
Feb 21 07:58:34.074: FIBipv4-packet-proc: route packet from Tunnel2 src
10.200.1.81
It's actually working on ME-3400G-2CS-A.
But this time, I got ME-3400G-12CS-A. And is behaving differently.
But same IOS.
From: Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, February
Hi.
I've posted this topic before.
But just to update
I have 7200 acting as LNS.
I have multiple QOS for the subscribers via Radius.
One GE interface of the 7200 LNS is facing to LAC.
I am trying to attach a QOS/shaper policy on this GE interface.
I am getting an error of:
user-defined
I am simulating a vrf-aware IPSEC VPN Concentrator with multiple dynamic
peers on GNS.
I have two client profiles on the 7200 concentrator.
I can have both clients working.
But I noticed when doing a restart of all the session,
one of the client will stop working.
I'm getting an error of:
.
A possible solution could be to use EzVPN Server/Client and match on Group
name in the ISAKMP Profile; this is what I do for RA VPN.
Cheers,
Matt
-Original Message-
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:20:32 +0800 (SGT)
From: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
.
Now what I need is how I can setup a site-to-site and dynamic-map crypto
maps together on one external public interface.
From: Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:18
Hi Guys.
I would like to setup a remote access IPSEC/SSL VPN then maps to MPLS VPN/VRFs.
I'm thinking of using 7206VXR as the concentrator/PE for this.
Remote clients will use cisco/microsoft vpn clients.
Site-to-site vpn will be supported too.
Anyone has good documentation for configuration?
From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200/7600 LLQ Wierd Problem
On (2012-01-18 05:59 +0800), ar wrote:
The new policy-map that Im trying to apply
Hi Guys.
I am trying to attach an LLQ policy to my 7200/7600 WAN Gigabit Ethernet
sub-interface. I cant seem to attach the policy and giving me an error.
But I can apply that same policy on the same interface (just different
sub-interface).
For 7200, Im using NPE-G1 GE interface:
Im
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200/7600 LLQ Wierd Problem
On (2012-01-17 15:05 +0800), ar wrote:
policy-map QOS
class VOICE
priority percent 60
class NET-MGMT
bandwidth remaining percent 5
class MISSION-CRITICAL
Wierd Problem
On (2012-01-17 20:45 +0800), ar wrote:
Yes, 7200 is acting as LNS running L2TP.
No service-policy on the main level interface..Just on sub-interfaces
What's your idea on this?
Are you providing QoS config per subscriber over radius? Platform seems to
think you have
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200/7600 LLQ Wierd Problem
On (2012-01-17 19:46 +0800), ar wrote:
I can attach it to Gi0/2.1554 but I cant configure it at Gi0/2.1500.
This is annoying and weird.
I have
:37 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200/7600 LLQ Wierd Problem
On (2012-01-17 20:31 +0800), ar wrote:
My only remaining problem now is on the 7200.
Hope somebody has experience on this error.
Did you have some subscriber stuff on 7200, PPPoE, PPPoA, L2TP? If not, do
you also have service policy
: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200/7600 LLQ Wierd Problem
On (2012-01-17 20:45 +0800), ar wrote:
Yes, 7200 is acting as LNS running L2TP.
No service-policy on the main level interface..Just on sub-interfaces
What's your idea on this?
Are you providing QoS config
On (2012-01-17 21:11 +0800), ar wrote:
Yes. there are QOS policies configured on the router and assigned to
subscriber using Radius.
In this case, how can I get rid of this? Change policy-map name probably?
It would be best to remove it completely from radius, so that you have no
subscriber
Hi everyone.
I have two scenarios:
1. VRF-lite leaks on a single PE router
This is working. Example, vlan500 on VRF-A leaked to VRF-B. ANd vlan
600 on VRF-B leaked to VRF-A.
But sometimes I'm getting weird results. Leaking not functioning.
Any ideas?
2. if import
I've done a research on LAC/LNS qos. POlicy maps will be applied on the
virtual-interface.
I believe QOS has to be done before or after the tunnel.
Is it possible to do QOS between the LAC and LNS instead? say LAC's interface
to LNS is Fa0/0 and LNS' interface to LAC is Fa1/0. Then apply
From: Ghassan.khalil ghassan.kha...@gmail.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 SVI (vlan interface) Policing
Dears
I faced the same issue with 7613
Hi.
Based on this article:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36278538/Cisco-QoS-6500-7600-Indepth-Design (see
notes below),
ingress policing can be applied on vlan interfaces and L2 switch ports, routed
ports.
But based on my testing, it seems only egress policing is working on vlan
interfaces.
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] LAC/LNS Routers - 7200 EOL
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 20:32 +0800, ar wrote:
Cisco announces the end-of-sale and end-of life
dates for the Cisco 7200 Series Routers. The last
pc50...@gmail.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:35 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] LAC/LNS Routers - 7200 EOL
7200 is just announced... it does still have several years of support
left though.
I didn't think a properly
Any other options for LAC/LNS functionality for the next 5 years?
ASR1K seems to be very expensive...
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Thank you so much. I'll check this LAC command..
From: Patrick Cole z...@amused.net
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ADSL sync speed Info at LAC/LNS
Thanks. Does the LAC sends the connect-info by default to LNS? and then LNS
sends them to Radius?
From: Patrick Cole z...@amused.net
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 9:43 PM
Hi.
I am trying to get info for the ADSL sync speed at the LAC/LNS level.
Is there a way I can get this?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
I can query the CPE dsl modem...Im thinking about the LAC/LNS Attributes speed
info if can be queried or pass directly to the radius.
From: Chris Jones chr...@aprole.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent
Many Thanks Guys...
This is something to consider.coz I need the qos badly
From: Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 QOS Per Sub-interface
You will
Traffic policing can be configured though in this WS linecards.
Though im not sure if its configurable but not working.
any comments?
From: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
To: Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi.
I know 7600 QOS is PFC based.
But here's the setup.
1 GE interface has multiple sub-interfaces for different customers. Each
sub-interface has to be assigned different bandwidth.
And that bandwidth has to be divided into voice, network management, critical
data and Best effort.
Hi.
Anyone knows how to get the Attribute type 24 and 38 from the LAC? This is I
think the ADSL sync speed.
I need to get the sync speed info either from LAC or LNS.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Thanks. So is there a way to do egress police on the WS cards?
From: Pavel Skovajsa pavel.skova...@gmail.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS/Layer2
Hi Guys.
I am searching for a good docs for Layer2 or VPLS Egress Policing (PE-to-CE).
Any one knows how to do this? I'm using 7600 with WS-6748 line card. Egress
policing facing is not allowed.
thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi. The PE actually prefer the one via OSPF learned from CE (Intra-area). It
has admin distance of 110 compred to 200 of MP-iBGP.
From: Harold Ritter hrit...@cisco.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday
Can somebody tell me why this route is being prefered?
I have 2 customer edge router. one on each site. The are linked together
running ospf for intra-area routes. Multihomed to the MPLS VPN service provider
using OSPF also as PE-to-CE routing protocol. Routes are redistributed so they
Good pointwill check it...many thanks...
From: Vitkovsky, Adam avitkov...@emea.att.com
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 1:20 AM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 7600 Route Reflector Issue
Hi
yet what will be the route decision in this case. Two identical
external routes on the routing table. But it seems, via the backdoor is being
preferred even if I increase the metric.
From: Enno Rey e...@ernw.de
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi.
I am using 7600 SRC/SRD train. I noticed that when using these as route
reflectors, these 7600 is not importing reflected routes from an RR on SRC/SRD
IOS. Other iBGP speakers (7200) are able to import. Is this a bug on 7600
SRC/SRD train? Both on ipv4 and vpnv4 are having issues.
Any
Hi.
I have a 3560 with 1G interface to client. But client bandwidth should only be
85Mbps. Is there a way to limit this low?
the srr-queue bandwidth limit command can only specify 10% as the lowest
percentage.
I am still trying to find ways by adjusting queues and thresholds.
Inputs
-to-EXP Mapping
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Monday, September 19, 2011, 9:11 PM
Yes please during the swap operation the
exp value of the incoming label is automatically used with the outgoing label
However during
, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net wrote:
From: Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 DSCP-to-EXP Mapping
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com, ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, September 19, 2011, 12:26 AM
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:29:53 PM Tony
I believe as the packet travels the MPLS domain, same EXP bits are applied as
they swap top labels..this means I can always match on the same exp bit as it
was mapped at the ingress PE. Do I still need the qos-groups in this case?
--- On Mon, 9/19/11, Vitkovsky, Adam avitkov...@emea.att.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, ar
ar_...@yahoo.com
Date: Friday, September 16, 2011, 12:29 PM
My understanding is that the 3 bits of the IP precedence field are copied to
the EXP as part of the MPLS encapsulation. This is not platform (or even
vendor) specific.
See
anyone aware of the default DSCP-to-EXP mapping ong 7200 series?
I know on 7600 mapping is automatic. I am not sure on 7200.
thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hi Guys.
Anyone tried running WCCP on 7606 and Riverbed Webcache engine? SRD6 do not
support WCCP VRF.
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Saturday, September 3, 2011, 10:52 PM
It really depends on your network. It's not inherently dangerous though. I've
even seen it done intentionally with the AS path looping used to prevent
certain customers from accidentally talking
wrote:
From: Keegan Holley keegan.hol...@sungard.com
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ReUSE AS number per VRF
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Date: Saturday, September 3, 2011, 11:17 PM
I'm not sure I understand. What's an NMS vrf? What's a client-to-client VRF?
2011/9/3 ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Alright. I
be an
issuebecause there will be lots of CE to configure with BGP...
--- On Sun, 9/4/11, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:
From: Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ReUSE AS number per VRF
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Sunday, September 4, 2011
Raszuk rob...@raszuk.net wrote:
From: Robert Raszuk rob...@raszuk.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Fw: Re: ReUSE AS number per VRF
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 12:10 AM
Hi,
By reusing the AS number you mean you will configure the same AS on
more
I am also planning to use this ME3600X or the ME3800 for VPLSlooks great
for edge mpls stuffs
what should be the minimum MTU considering VPLS with QinQ, TE/FRR?
thanks
--- On Fri, 9/2/11, Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.com wrote:
From: Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.com
of a hinderance
to progress.
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, ar ar_...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Subject: [c-nsp] Service Provider Networks: Cisco vs XYZ
To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011, 10:37 PM
Hi Peeps.
I am pro-Cisco on building IP/MPLS service
Hi Peeps.
I am pro-Cisco on building IP/MPLS service provider networks. I've proven its
capabilities.
However, does anyone has a study/comparison or testing with other brands?
Brocade,Huawei,Juniper,HP?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi. Aside from Nagios, any other opensource monitoring tool you are using that
greatly works for cisco especially 7600 series?
thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
85 matches
Mail list logo
