Re: [c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping?

2010-12-18 Thread Garry
Just noticed, looks like they even messed up the IPv4 part in conjunction with standby IPs ... e.g.: int g0/0/0 ip add 172.20.0.10 255.255.255.0 backup-interface g0/0/1 int g0/0/1 ip add 172.20.0.10 255.255.255.0 This config of course works fine ... attempting to add

Re: [c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping?

2010-12-15 Thread Ian Henderson
On 15/12/2010, at 1:54 AM, Garry wrote: I'm really starting to wonder whether we're the only ones on this earth still using a dual switch config for our routers for redundancy purposes ... So you're using backup interface for two Ethernet interfaces, both facing the same switched network?

Re: [c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping?

2010-12-15 Thread Phil Mayers
On 15/12/10 13:13, Ian Henderson wrote: On 15/12/2010, at 1:54 AM, Garry wrote: I'm really starting to wonder whether we're the only ones on this earth still using a dual switch config for our routers for redundancy purposes ... So you're using backup interface for two Ethernet interfaces,

Re: [c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping?

2010-12-15 Thread Garry
On 15.12.2010 08:29, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote: Garry, It could be related to CSCth59072 Backup interface up instead of standby which affects the ASR1K. The latest 15.0(1)S version (03.01.02.S.150-1.S2) should have the fix... Not sure about the exact extent of this bug, but I'm not having

Re: [c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping?

2010-12-15 Thread Garry
On 15.12.2010 14:13, Ian Henderson wrote: On 15/12/2010, at 1:54 AM, Garry wrote: I'm really starting to wonder whether we're the only ones on this earth still using a dual switch config for our routers for redundancy purposes ... So you're using backup interface for two Ethernet

[c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping?

2010-12-14 Thread Garry
rant Having just installed a set of nice ASR1k boxes with rather new IOS, I noticed Cisco has still (after many years and many IOS releases) not managed to get Backup Interfaces IPv6 to work with each other ... or I'm missing something ... but while IPv4 addresses on backup interfaces work just

Re: [c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping?

2010-12-14 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 12/14/10 6:54 AM, Garry wrote: rant Having just installed a set of nice ASR1k boxes with rather new IOS, I noticed Cisco has still (after many years and many IOS releases) not managed to get Backup Interfaces IPv6 to work with each other ... or I'm missing something ... but while IPv4

Re: [c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping?

2010-12-14 Thread Garry
On 14.12.2010 17:47, Seth Mattinen wrote: ipv6 address 2001:0DB8:107:400::1/64 anycast This will suppress duplicate address detection. Nope, doesn't work either ... used the anycast option on both interfaces, still get the warning on the standby interface, or error when using it on it when in

Re: [c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping?

2010-12-14 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Garry Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 16:55 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Backup Interface IPv6 - why is Cisco sleeping? rant Having just installed a set of nice ASR1k boxes with rather new IOS, I noticed Cisco has still (after