It would be most useful to us in 7200 code right now...
(we are unlikely to trunk on 7600)
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Dickinson
To: Rodney Dunn
Cc: David Freedman; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Sent: 24/09/07 19:41
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Bug CSCeh27672 (EoMPLS MTU enhancements
Rodney Dunn wrote:
It's not in any shipping code yet.
I happened to check it today as I'm in a Carrier Ethernet Services class.
There is a request in to port the changes to SRA and SRB throttle.
No clue yet where they will allow them to go yet.
Rodney
Thanks for this Rodney.
Although
On (2007-09-24 19:41 +0100), Ian Dickinson wrote:
Although I really want this as described, I want this backporting to 12.2SB
(or 12.2SRC depending on what happens there) and 12.0S, to be able to really
rely on it, ie 7200/7301/GSR as well as 7600. Any updates on target releases
for this
Freedman; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Sent: 24/09/07 19:41
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Bug CSCeh27672 (EoMPLS MTU enhancements)
Rodney Dunn wrote:
It's not in any shipping code yet.
I happened to check it today as I'm in a Carrier Ethernet Services
class.
There is a request in to port
Appears to now be resolved, does anybody know what feature name this
became, or where I can find it?
I'm looking at being able to modify VLAN based EoMPLS attachment circuit
perceived MTU such to be able to fool an EoMPLS pseudowire into being able
to come up (to pass RFC4447 MTU check) when
It's not in any shipping code yet.
I happened to check it today as I'm in a Carrier Ethernet Services class.
There is a request in to port the changes to SRA and SRB throttle.
No clue yet where they will allow them to go yet.
Rodney
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 02:00:24AM +0100, David Freedman