Re: [c-nsp] QoS for skype with nbar on 837 with 12.3(11)YZ2

2009-06-21 Thread Giorgos Manousakis
Thanks for the reply, Still there must be a way to prioritize (or block) skype traffic. In my scenario just because of the small uplink bandwidth I need to give it priority. I tried a packet capture on my pc and random ports were used. But maybe I can give priority to traffic destined to Level

Re: [c-nsp] QoS for skype with nbar on 837 with 12.3(11)YZ2

2009-06-21 Thread Matthew Huff
I'm afraid you are out of look. In order to get skype 3.0 into IOS, Cisco had to leave behind PDLM and hard code it. Even then it's pretty useless. Only solution is to get to 12.4(22)T+ Matthew Huff   | One Manhattanville Rd OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 http://www.ox.com 

[c-nsp] QoS for skype with nbar on 837 with 12.3(11)YZ2

2009-06-19 Thread Giorgos Manousakis
Dear All, i am trying to apply QoS on my aDsl interface (2048/256) and i need to give strict priority to voice traffic, including skype and g711. I suppose that i can match the g711 by using nbar rtp audio protocol or by using source ports that are know on my asterisk server. Because of

Re: [c-nsp] QoS for skype with nbar on 837 with 12.3(11)YZ2

2009-06-19 Thread Matthew Huff
Even with the newest Skype nbar pdlm or built-in nbar in 12.4T(x), it is pretty useless. The majority of Skype traffic is sent now encrypted over port 443. The only way I know to monitor/block it is with something like bluecoat/websense, and then only at the point of origin (since you have to