Hi Gert,
My bad. You are right. It has been too long since I last checked ;-)
Le 2010-10-20 à 16:28, Gert Doering a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:01:52PM -0400, Harold Ritter wrote:
>> Redistribution without metrics will lead to the exact same result for Eigrp
>> for IPv4.
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:01:52PM -0400, Harold Ritter wrote:
> Redistribution without metrics will lead to the exact same result for Eigrp
> for IPv4.
No. static -> eigrp will nicely pick interface bandwidth etc.
-> eigrp needs metrics set.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable pa
t;> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 5:14 PM
>> To: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
>> Subject: [c-nsp] Redistributing ipv6 static default route into eigrp failure
>>
>> Okay, I must be missing something. I've setup a default static route that is
>> showing up
n...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Huff
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 5:14 PM
> To: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> Subject: [c-nsp] Redistributing ipv6 static default route into eigrp failure
>
> Okay, I must be missing something. I've setup a default static
Okay, I must be missing something. I've setup a default static route that is
showing up in the ipv6 route tables, but not in the local ipv6 eigrp topology
nor redistributing out. Anyone have a clue? Or yet another ipv6 bug
interface Vlan4
ip address 129.77.4.252 255.255.255.0
ipv6 address 2620
