On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:30 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
If you don't have overlapping TE tunnels ? what is meaning of this
If none of your MPLS TE LSPs use the same underlying links you will
never have any need for prioritisation, and thus never have any need for
AutoBandwidth.
An example: We
why would we have overlapping TE tunnels ?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:30 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
If you don't have overlapping TE tunnels ? what is meaning of this
If none of your MPLS TE LSPs use the same underlying
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:34:57 am Peter Rathlev
wrote:
AutoBandwidth gives you the advantage of having the
network recalculate LSPs every now and then. This can
(partly) overcome the scenario where the specific time
of establishing an LSP would have a negative effect on
how it's
If you don't have overlapping TE tunnels ? what is meaning of this
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:21 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
I'm stuck in the understanding - does oit make sense to implement MPLS
AutoBandwidth in scenario
its core transport network for connectivity betweeen GSM packet core devices.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Keegan Holley
keegan.hol...@sungard.com wrote:
Unless all 20 subnets are exactly the same, you may not need mpls at all.
Why did you go with MPLS in the first place? What sort of
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:21 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
I'm stuck in the understanding - does oit make sense to implement MPLS
AutoBandwidth in scenario where I have only 20 subnets max to be sent
on this Backbone.
AutoBandwidth gives you the advantage of having the network recalculate
LSPs
Hi guys,
I'm stuck in the understanding - does oit make sense to implement MPLS
AutoBandwidth in scenario where I have only 20 subnets max to be sent
on this Backbone. What will be pros and corns of this , if u experts
can show me a path.
Thanks and Regards
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:26 AM,
Hi guys,
is cisco MPLS* *AutoBandwidth Allocator* supported on cisco 7600 platform.*
**
*Regards*
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 23:35 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
is cisco MPLS* *AutoBandwidth Allocator* supported on cisco 7600 platform.*
**
It's trivial to find out with a browser and an Internet connection.
Seeing the you use GMail you seem to have both. :-)
According to the Cisco Feature
thanks peter
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 23:35 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
is cisco MPLS* *AutoBandwidth Allocator* supported on cisco 7600 platform.*
**
It's trivial to find out with a browser and an Internet connection.
hope MPLS TE - Auto-bandwidth enhancement and MPLS TE -
Auto-bandwidth allocator are same feature
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:20 AM, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks peter
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 23:35
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 00:21 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
hope MPLS TE - Auto-bandwidth enhancement and MPLS TE -
Auto-bandwidth allocator are same feature
That seems strange. So you're saying you don't need something technical
solution to a problem you have, you need a feature called
12 matches
Mail list logo
