On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Adrian Minta wrote:
You will always be on the edge. C3550 was a better switch than C3560
IMHO.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
I am curious why you feel the 3550 is better than the 3560? Any
factual
reason, or just a matter of personal preference for some reason.
Hi
On a test setup we have below,
ISPR1 ISPR2
| | --- point to point ethernet links
| |
R1 R2
| |
| |
-vlan100-- --- resilient ethernet backbone
||
||
R3 R4
R1 has eBGP peering to ISPR1 and R2 has
Kevin Barrass wrote on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:57 AM:
Hi
On a test setup we have below,
ISPR1 ISPR2
| --- point to point ethernet links
|
R1 R2
|
|
-vlan100-- --- resilient ethernet backbone
||
|
Hi just to correct my below email the next hop scanning was happening very 60
seconds
Regards
Kev
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kevin Barrass
Sent: Wed 31/10/2007 12:08
To: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] iBGP
Hi!
Notes on bugid CSCea46385 states:
Keepalives are sent on ALL interfaces by default in 12.1EA based software.
Starting in 12.2SE based releases, keepalives are NO longer sent by
default on fiber and uplink interfaces.
So, how do the switch define an uplink interface?
I have a scenario that
Kevin,
see
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_
guide09186a00803b8dd9.html and
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6922/products_feature_guide09186a0
0807c64d0.html for NHT and selective NHT respectively..
These features are not yet widely available, you
Hello list .
Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE and Sup 720
3BXL.
We are running 12.2(18)SXF8 on it on both 10GE linecards went down on the
same time this morning hereWe had to reload it
to get things back to normal .
Any inputs are welcome
Cheers for below will have a read, have a feeling it wont be supported
on our platform.
Even if its not supported its better that I now know why we are seeing
the problem we have.
Regards
Kev
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list .
Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE and Sup 720
3BXL.
We are running 12.2(18)SXF8 on it on both 10GE linecards went down on the
same time this morning hereWe had to
Hello list .
Has anyone ever encountered
David Ponsdesserre
+44 207 762 4877
-
London Telecom and Network
Societe Generale Corporate and Investment Banking
On 10/30/07, Natambu Obleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone recommend a OC-12 to Gigabit converter?
One of our connectors has recently deployed one of these:
I think this topic came up in the past. RAD and Adva Optical are
the two that come to mind initially. Marconi (now Ericsson) makes
something as well.
Phil
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Natambu Obleton wrote:
Can anyone recommend a OC-12 to Gigabit converter?
Natambu Obleton
Oupps sorry about that .
This is the log of that specific day .I save you all the boring part but
does someone knows what does the entry below means ? Does it means I am
not able to enable Cef ??
Oct 29 06:25:35.486: %C6KFIB-4-DISABLED:
Hardware FIB forwarding
Hi,
Tipical behaviour if TCAM is overflowed. How many TCAM entries you
have?
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, [EMAIL
Running out of space on the 3BXL would be impressive at this point,
unless you are doing testing... Also, when the TCAM fills up it will
give a message like CEF table full, some prefixes will be software
switched, and starts dropping short-length prefixes from the TCAM.
I've seen that
What code?
Are you seeing any throttles?
What's the fanout for the multicast?
Rodney
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:12:08PM -0400, Vincent Aniello wrote:
On a 7206VXR with a NPE-G1 processor I am seeing input errors on a
Gigabit Ethernet interface. The input errors are due to ignored
Thanks to all for the replies .
I am not about how to check the number a tcam entries on 6500 sh tcam
counts detail ip?
sclisgh022#sh tcam counts detail ip
UsedFreeReserved
ACL_TCAM
HI BANK
Masks: 1
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:39:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all for the replies .
I am not about how to check the number a tcam entries on 6500 sh tcam
counts detail ip?
David,
Try these out for size:
sh run | inc mls
sh mls cef sum
show platform hardware
Thanks for this Jared. As you will see below i think we are far away to
overflow the Tcam on this switch .
Total routes: 4
IPv4 unicast routes: 1
IPv4 Multicast routes:3
MPLS routes: 0
IPv6 unicast routes: 0
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:57:55PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for this Jared. As you will see below i think we are far away to
overflow the Tcam on this switch .
You should be able to re-enable cef by doing:
conf t
ip cef distributed
if that doesn't work, what
I'm trying to find a way to avoid (or at least be warned about) duplicate ip
addresses on a lan connected to a ME-3400.
I have checked IP Source Guard Dynamic ARP Inspection but both require
either a dhcp snooping database (in my case ips are
statically configured) or a static ip-mac mapping
A new 3BXL in burn-in keeps dumping crashinfo's.. bad hardware, or IOS
problem?
Details:
IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version
12.2(18)SXF11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
NAME: WS-C6506-E, DESCR: Cisco Systems Catalyst 6500 6-slot Chassis
System
PID: WS-C6506-E, VID:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 06:17:04PM +0200, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
So, I'm looking for something that snoops the arp/ip packets,
creates an ip-mac table and if an ip stored in this table appears
with a new mac, then report an error. Is there such a feature on
a switch (or router)?
I
Hello, I'm troubleshooting 12000 platforms, i entered the following command
show environment power_supply :
Slot # 5V MBUS 5V 48V AMP_48
(mv) (mv) (Volt) (Amp)
24 0 5112 00
26 55845144 47 13
* What is status of the power supply in slot 24?, is it
Hello, I'm configuring NSF with SSO in a 12000 platform with different PRP's
(PRP-1 and PRP-2).
should I be concerned about loss of state during switchover?
Can I use different PRP's?
Thanks,
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version
12.2(18)SXF11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
It's at a default burn-in config already.. I'm leaning toward a defective
SUP, although this is our first SXF11 build deployment.. we have SXF8 on the
rest of our 720's
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO
12.2S, VIP2-50, 128MB, dCEF w/full routes. Here is the tech output from
the VIP itself:
HeadTotal(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b)
Largest(b)
Processor 60AE49C0 122795584787818444401374043953028
32807708
PCI 3000 4194312 4193848
Back when we shut all our 7500s down, 128mb on VIP2-50s was enough to hold
a full table with 12.2S software. I'd be surprised if that wasn't still
enough...but certainly there will come a day when it's not.
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Aaron wrote:
You need the memory for the routing table
On
You need the memory for the routing table
On 10/30/07, Jon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll disagree. While that 7507 ought to be retired :), I've seen
vip2-50's pushing single FEs to darn near line-rate...so 2 customers doing
25-50mbit each ought to be doable...especially if they spend
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Darryl Dunkin wrote:
12.2S, VIP2-50, 128MB, dCEF w/full routes. Here is the tech output from
the VIP itself:
HeadTotal(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b)
Largest(b)
Processor 60AE49C0 122795584787818444401374043953028
What sort of
Here is the scenario:
DSL is on a 7206 Router (Distribution Router for the Network) with a
8T1IMA Card. Have a DS-3 ATM card available for growth.
We have T-1s to customers on this router, Ethernet L3 stuff, Private
Line VLANs, and local peering not upstream. Goal is to separate DSL and
T-1s
Well a reboot seems to have fixed this, as Phil says.
Just one oddity left, I cannot rename vlan 1002.
Any ideas?
Phil Mayers wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 10:10 +0100, Ian MacKinnon wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to create some vlans on a 6500 Sup32 running 12.2SXH
When I try and create vlan
32 matches
Mail list logo
