On (2008-09-14 22:50 +0200), Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
Hey,
Just out of curiosity what were main points that left you
wanting?
QinQ termination, EoMPLS, VPLS.
EoMPLS was show stopper for me, would have EFT'n it to see
more closely otherwise.
VPLS I don't care, EoMPLS + 7600 as
Hi all,
while practicing with VRF-lite recently, i seem to have encounter with a
nasty problem.
I typed in manually this sample config, it works (credits to oliver from
cisco):
!--
ip vrf customer_A
rd 1:1
route-target export 1:100
route-target import 1:900
!
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008, matthew zeier wrote:
I would be interested in the results of such an experiment (I was about
to research this this week myself).
Church, Charles wrote:
I got curious last week when I saw this thread. From my (AS 26296)
point of view, there aren't a whole lot of
Hello!
Can't other than agree with you that the 3550 + arp-inspection fails completely
:-) But i have been running dhcp-snooping + dai on 3750 for quite some time
now, and it works just great! Even better if you add the ip verify source
port-security on each user interface aswell (eliminating
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 04:50 ---
Here is a reduced testcase without -ffast-math (aka it also applies to integers
:) ):
int zot(int );
struct bar {
~bar() { }
};
int x;
void doit(int a, int b, int c) {
bar pn;
int b1 = zot(a) * c;
int b2 = zot(b) *
Hi Everybody
Has anybody had any real world experiences running time based sampling
on a 7600 as a way to still be able to extrapolate traffic through the
box even if the TCAM cache fills up?
From what I've read in the documentation, if you configure say a time
based sampling rate of 1024, it
Roddy,
Do you see a corresponding match for the frame mapped to the VAI
for the user?
Or are those OSPF hellos coming from OSPF neighbors directly
attached to the g0/1/0.1 subinterface?
Can you provide the output with the column headers?
Rodney
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 02:46:14PM +1000, Roddy
Hi,
following up on this:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:33:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote:
Gert Doering wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:02:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote:
- the BGP ghost bug is back :-(
I have now managed to open a TAC case on this - in case you want to
open your own case
Hi,
Thanks to all who have replied I will look into all options.
I think Iperf and Netperf are the great tests for PTP links.
Maybe you could have a look at that page
:http://kb.pert.geant2.net/PERTKB/BandwidthMeasurementTools
that extensively use IPPERF/BWCTL so as to troubleshoot TCP
Hi members,
I would like to know best practices in the following network design.
We are some company with distributed office location all over the
world. We lease IP/MPLS service on our service provider, but in some
offices we buy 10Mb/s and in another 1Mb/s. The aim is to configure
our
Feature Navigator says that IEEE 802.1Q-in-Q VLAN Tag Termination is
available in asr1000rp1-ipbase.02.01.00.122-33.XNA.bin.
I was certainly worried for a minute there :)
/Benny
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 04:50:13PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Cisco-A#sh ip b 193.31.7.1/32
% Network not in table
Cisco-B#sh ip b 193.31.7.1/32
BGP routing table entry for 193.31.7.1/32, version 16726560
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Flag: 0x820
List,
Does anyone know of a way to export the statistics in the SMB service response
time window from within wireshark? I am using wireshark to analyze some Cisco
WAAS traffic and I can generate the SMB stats but I can't get them out of
Wireshark into Excel where I need to them? Any ideas?
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:50:26AM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote:
Just out of curiosity what were main points that left you
wanting?
QinQ termination, EoMPLS, VPLS.
EoMPLS was show stopper for me, would have EFT'n it to see
more closely otherwise.
VPLS I don't care, EoMPLS + 7600 as
Hi,
My company recently bought 202[dot]90[dot]194[dot]0/23 IPs, and since we start
using this IPs, I can't access several site on the net. When check through
robtex.com, a company in India seem to still include these IPs into their RADB
database. I can't email them, browse their sites, maybe
Hello...
I'm curious, is bgp dampening on or off?
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:50 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
following up on this:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:33:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote:
Gert Doering wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:02:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote:
-
Hi,
Hi,
My company recently bought 202[dot]90[dot]194[dot]0/23 IPs, and since we
start using this IPs, I can't access several site on the net. When check
through robtex.com, a company in India seem to still include these IPs into
their RADB database. I can't email them, browse their sites,
Has anybody worked extensively with L2PT on Trunk ports on Cisco's ME
platforms?
The documentation on their site is weak...
This may seem like a dumb question, but is L2PT vlan aware on a trunk
port? (yes, I realize how dumb that sounds)
Specifically, with per vlan spanning tree, (or
insan praja wrote:
Hi,
My company recently bought 202[dot]90[dot]194[dot]0/23 IPs, and since we start using this IPs, I can't access several site on the net. When check through robtex.com, a company in India seem to still include these IPs into their RADB database. I can't email them, browse
Sergey Voropaev
We can configure shaping for every single class. For example we can
create class OFFICE_1---OFFICE_2 and shape it to 1Mb/s. And then
shape all this classes by parent shaper applied to outbound interface.
But this is also unacceptable because of if traffic to OFFICE_2 will
Hi everyone
I was just wondering if anyone have got a cookbook sort of document for Call
Manager v6.1. One that steps you through a setup of calling search spaces,
partitions, route liste and so on. I had this for CCM 4.1, but I lost It
somewhere, and now we have moved on to 6.1.
After this I
Hello,
I'm curious, is bgp dampening on or off?
Just to second (or third?) this bug. We've got four 7600s on SXH3 which
are afflicted by this - they were upgraded from 2a on tac's advise (to
avoid netflow bug related spontaneous reloads) - and we don't use
dampening. It doesn't seem to
From what I hear from our account people, SXF is considered a 'dead'
train, and you should move to SXH or SXI. We've got a serious NAT bug
in SXF14 that they're claiming won't be fixed in SXF. Sucks for our
huge Sup2 base.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
My company recently bought 202[dot]90[dot]194[dot]0/23 IPs, and since we start
using this IPs, I can't access several site on the net. When check through
robtex.com, a company in India seem to still include these IPs into their RADB
database. I can't email them, browse their sites, maybe
Rodney,
Thanks for the reply.
Yes I can see a corresponding match to the VAI for the user, that side of it
is fine.
Here is an output you requested :
Router(ASR1004)#sh ip cache flow
IP packet size distribution (1987515 total packets):
1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352
We are starting to look at migration to 10gig and I was wondering if
anyone knows of any networking gear that actually supports 10GBaseT.
Intel has nic's available, I just wonder what you plug them into. The
all knowing, all powerful google seems to be no help here.
Thanks!
Michael Balasko
Mike Louis wrote:
Does anyone know of a way to export the statistics in the SMB service
response time window from within wireshark?
I haven't needed to do this but you might want to look at whether any
of the stats tshark can generate are of any use to you.
Manpage here:
SMC Tigerswitch 10g is the only thing I can see out there, $23 K for
20 ports in 1U.
Not much considering NICs seem pretty widely available.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Eric Van Tol wrote:
The idea here is very simple - there are ports that receive
a data-only service and a ports that receive both data and voice.
What do you /really/ need to achieve here? Priority for voice? Rate
limitation of voice, data or both to a certain rate?
Also how do you identify
I have an SSH server on the inside of a network, and the ASA is blocking SSH
requests even tho I have an ACL permitting them and a static NAT to the SSH
server.
The ASA says it is blocked by the outside ACL even tho SSH (TCP 22) is
specifically permitted... any ideas?
Jonathan
hi Michael,
Michael Balasko wrote:
We are starting to look at migration to 10gig and I was wondering if
anyone knows of any networking gear that actually supports 10GBaseT.
Intel has nic's available, I just wonder what you plug them into. The
all knowing, all powerful google seems to be no help
just an example i found rate-limiting the traffic use policy map.
policy-map BE-6mbps
class RATELIMIT
police cir 6144000 bc 128000 be 128000conform-action
set-dscp-transmit defaultexceed-action drop violate-action drop
interface GigabitEthernet13/47
service-policy input
just another example we are using on ME 3400 series switches.
policy-map BE-test-in
class rate-limit
police cir 1024000 bc 16000
conform-action set-cos-transmit 0
exceed-action drop
!
Regards,
Waqqas Ahmed
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Syed Waqqas Ahmed [EMAIL
Simon Hamilton-Wilkes wrote:
SMC Tigerswitch 10g is the only thing I can see out there, $23 K for
20 ports in 1U.
Extreme also have the X650. Not sure about availability.
Regards,
Brad
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
34 matches
Mail list logo
