After issuing no ip nat service sip udp port 5060 and clearing the nat
translation table solved the issue.
Thank you all
With regards,
Bikash Bhattarai
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of LM
Sent:
On 2010-09-30 05:41, Dale W. Carder wrote:
Sup2 would implement IPv6 routing (if it does at all) in software.
That might be ok for test purposes, but not appreciable workloads.
Otherwise, you would want a sup720.
Sup2 will forward IPv6 in software with performance around 200kpps
maximum.
We are running into a TCAM issue on our 6500's running SXI3/IP services on
SUP720/PFC3B
The message we keep getting is Hardware TCAM exceeded. Our ACL TCAM's are
running full
Show tcam counts doesnot indicate a problem
Show tcam counts detail indicates the masks on the HI BANK is 99% used.
The
On Sep 30, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Shanawaz wrote:
Is there a way of borrowing space from other TCAM's (Qos TCAM, Netflow TCAM)
to supply the ACL tcam? Also why is the Hi BANK getting full whereas the LOW
BANK has plenty in spare?
hello,
I have a session server for thin clients to connect to. the session server has
2 NICs(one connecting to the organization switching infrastucture and the other
one to the thin client network/subnet only). i have connected one cisco 2960
switch (new switch with default confg) to connect
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 01:49 -0700, teklay gebremichael wrote:
hello,
I have a session server for thin clients to connect to. the session server
has 2 NICs(one connecting to the organization switching infrastucture and the
other one to the thin client network/subnet only). i have connected
On (2010-09-30 10:08 +0200), Lukasz Bromirski wrote:
Both Sup32 and Sup720 do support IPv6 in hardware, as it's function
of PFC to store FIB and forward traffic.
Two things to watch for in EARL7.x.
ACL
It can only do /128 lookup, if no L4 lookups are used in any ACL. This is
the default
On 30/09/10 10:17, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2010-09-30 10:08 +0200), Lukasz Bromirski wrote:
Both Sup32 and Sup720 do support IPv6 in hardware, as it's function
of PFC to store FIB and forward traffic.
Two things to watch for in EARL7.x.
ACL
It can only do /128 lookup, if no L4 lookups are
teklay gebremichael teklis...@yahoo.com wrote:
since we are planning to have computer lab with old pcs that will boot
from the server, this problem is very critical. is there some thing
enabled by default on the switch that prevents booting from the
network?
'spanning-tree portfast
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Security Team wrote:
I am looking at a new setup and wondering what is the minimum setup that a
Cat6500 can do IOS/BGP things on IPv6 and IPv4? As long as I am setting up
a new setup I may as well learn how to handle the IPv4 and IPv6 dual battle
of the bits. Can a Sup2
Thanks Alex.
i just enabled the portfast default and the portfast bpduguad default from the
global config mode and it worked for me.
--- On Thu, 9/30/10, Alexander Clouter a...@digriz.org.uk wrote:
From: Alexander Clouter a...@digriz.org.uk
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] help on pxe boot
To:
Re,
wma...@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (William F. Maton Sotomayor) wrote:
I am looking at a new setup and wondering what is the minimum setup that a
Cat6500 can do IOS/BGP things on IPv6 and IPv4? As long as I am setting up
a new setup I may as well learn how to handle the IPv4 and IPv6 dual battle
Does anyone have a 10G SPA in an ASR1k? If so, could you post the
output of show standby capability, as it would be interesting to see
whether the 10G interface hardware supports 511 HSRP groups. It would
appears that logical port-channel groups support a very limited number
of HSRP groups.
Running 15.0(1)S.
ASR1kshow standby capability
ASR1006 * indicates hardware may
support HSRP
|
Interface Type H Potential Max Groups
per subin
Te1/0/089
here you go:
1006#sho standby capability
ASR1006 * indicates hardware may
support HSRP
|
Interface Type H Potential Max Groups per
subin
Gi0/0/027 SPA-5X1GE-V2
I am configuring an ASR1006 with the following SPA cards installed.
SPA-10X1GE-V2
SPA-4XT3/E3
SPA-8XCHT1/E1
Do anybody know the command to type to make the router recognize the
following cards ?
SPA-4XT3/E3
SPA-8XCHT1/E1
Because when i do sho ip int brief
i only see the following
Interface
I believe it is card type command.
config t#card type t3 0 3
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Renelson Panosky panocisc...@gmail.comwrote:
I am configuring an ASR1006 with the following SPA cards installed.
SPA-10X1GE-V2
SPA-4XT3/E3
SPA-8XCHT1/E1
Do anybody know the command to type to
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:50:31 -0400, you wrote:
I am configuring an ASR1006 with the following SPA cards installed.
SPA-10X1GE-V2
SPA-4XT3/E3
Have you read and tried Required Configuration Tasks:
No, That's not it. that's for the 3800 and 3900 series
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Mack O'Brian mackobria...@gmail.comwrote:
I believe it is card type command.
config t#card type t3 0 3
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Renelson Panosky
panocisc...@gmail.com wrote:
I am
Thanks for info all!
Looks like it's 2047 for the SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 and 511 for each GE port of the
on-board 4-port GE SPA card. Even reusing the same HSRP groups (in this case
just 1 and 2) on different sub-interfaces on the same physical interface
counts towards the supported maximum on a
Hi,
Does anyone know if the Cisco twingig converter can be setup on the Cisco
7600 platform.
The commands for enabling them on the 4500 don't seem to be available on my
7600.
Appreciate your response. Thanks.
Felix
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Sep 30, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Roger Wiklund wrote:
On Cisco routers, we always have to turn the sip nat OFF
This has been my experience as well, the SIP-ALG in IOS is broken, and will
also break other SIP (eg: Apple iChat) as well. I've seen it with Cisco IP
phones using SIP behind Cisco
XYZ01-exacc-rtr01#show inventory | I SPA
NAME: module 0, DESCR: Cisco ASR1000 SPA Interface Processor 10
NAME: SPA subslot 0/0, DESCR: 5-port Gigabit Ethernet Shared Port
Adapter
PID: SPA-5X1GE-V2 , VID: V02, SN: JAE1139YA4X
NAME: SPA subslot 0/1, DESCR: 8-port Channelized T1/E1 to DS0 Shared
Hi,
I'm trying to limit outgoing traffic from our PE router (7606, 12.2(33)SRD4)
from 'whatever' source (inside our network) to transit lines.
This router is the only one with active full BGP feeds, so whole traffic
flowing to transit is going through this box.
What am I trying to
Matt,
I am curious, why do you have to use different MAC addresses for the
different HSRP groups?
If you use the same HSRP group ID on the different sub-ifs, we use the
same MAC address...
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
On 2010-09-30 21:41, Felix Nkansah wrote:
Does anyone know if the Cisco twingig converter can be setup on
the Cisco 7600 platform.
No. There's no support and no plan to support it.
--
Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski
If it's not okay, it's not the
The only solution I can think on the top of my head is deploying SCE8000 along
with Policy Server, thus you can have global visibility of the transit traffic.
Of course this is not cheap.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
So I went to download the latest image for an ancient router and
received this nifty error message:
Service Agreement Validation Warning:
Please read before downloading software
As part of an ongoing effort to provide you with exceptional service and
support, Cisco is making enhancements to its
We don't have different MAC addresses; we only use two HSRP groups which
would normally imply two distinct HSRP MAC addresses; one for each group.
The issue we're seeing is we're re-using the same HSRP groups on each
customer sub-interface which (somehow) is limiting the number of
sub-interfaces
On 2010-10-01 00:28, Seth Mattinen wrote:
So I went to download the latest image for an ancient router and
received this nifty error message:
Seeing as how the 3640 went EOS in 2002 and EOL in 2007, it can't have a
service contract or be eligible for one. Is this something I should care
about?
Hello,
Hi,
I'm trying to limit outgoing traffic from our PE router (7606,
12.2(33)SRD4)
from 'whatever' source (inside our network) to transit lines.
This router is the only one with active full BGP feeds, so whole
traffic
flowing to transit is going through this box.
What am I
On 9/30/2010 15:53, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2010-10-01 00:28, Seth Mattinen wrote:
So I went to download the latest image for an ancient router and
received this nifty error message:
Seeing as how the 3640 went EOS in 2002 and EOL in 2007, it can't have a
service contract or be eligible
On 2010-10-01 01:15, Seth Mattinen wrote:
There's a End of new service attachment - November 2006. So, a
customer activating a 5-year agreement with Cisco on November 2006
could have a support to November 2011. Usually such agrements are made
as part of multi-year Advanced Services contracts.
On 9/30/2010 16:42, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2010-10-01 01:15, Seth Mattinen wrote:
There's a End of new service attachment - November 2006. So, a
customer activating a 5-year agreement with Cisco on November 2006
could have a support to November 2011. Usually such agrements are made
as
On 2010-10-01 01:57, Seth Mattinen wrote:
The odd thing is that it doesn't seem to be tied to valid contracts
because I tried an 877 image (I let smartnet expire after it was
decommissioned) and it didn't say anything.
Perhaps the 3640 is just too old.
Bear in mind that before the IOS license
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 03:36:38 pm Peter Rathlev
wrote:
Just the lack of clarity in documentation and/or lack of
I haven't had a chance to deploy kinky stuff with IOS XR
(our boxes are core nodes, and the most interesting things
are IS-IS, IPv6 and LDP, hehe).
But all commands and
On 30.09.2010 00:45, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
It works the same with regards to switch ports, however the WLAN AP
is autonomous.
You can configure up to 14 VLANs (Table 3):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps380/data_sheet_c78-519930.html
Thanks!
37 matches
Mail list logo
