So I have a MPLS vpn question for the masterminds on this list;)
I have two central services VRFs, A and B and I need route leaking
(same import/export) between them to optimize traffic flow. The reason
I need two VRFs is that I have to specifiy a different default gw for
each VRF.
But the
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
What throughput can bigger/newer plattform like Sup32/ASR provide with
netflow ?
Sup32 is PFC3B so same as Sup720/PFC3B. PFC3B supports 128K NetFlow
entries. For us it was OK for ~2Gbps traffic with smalls customers
The NSE-* have hardware forwarding that never really worked, so the
whole product line was abandoned. Short summary. Don't Go There.
Not really. It's true for 7200 and NSE-1. But not true for 7304 and
NSE-100 and NSE-150. We're still using around 7 of 7304/NSE-100 and
NSE-150 based as
7300 series will also never have 4 byte ASN support ?
Last I heard, admittedly over a year ago, but likely a side issue to the
topic.
On 18 December 2011 11:45, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
The NSE-* have hardware forwarding that never really worked, so the
whole product line was abandoned.
7609 with 12.2(33)SRD6, ADVENTERPRISEK9.
7600-ES+20G3C in slot 8.
The configuration below works fine in 3945, but not in
7609. Of the two BULK classes, the one that is written
first in the policy-map is matched with no consideration
to the time-range. The other never gets any matches.
The
Hi
What size of FIB for IPv4/IPv6 has ASR 901 ? I cannot find this
information in documentation and datasheets.
Rob
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On Sunday, December 18, 2011 03:06:18 AM Andrew Miehs wrote:
Apart from running something like running lots of E1s,
x21 interfaces I would no longer purchase a new 7200. As
for second hand boxes - if you can get a service
contract for them, ok.
Same.
If we're buying for small-to-medium
On 2011-12-18 14:03, Robert Hass wrote:
Hi
What size of FIB for IPv4/IPv6 has ASR 901 ? I cannot find this
information in documentation and datasheets.
It's 12k for IPv4 + 8k ARP entries (local hosts).
IPv6 is not supported yet.
--
There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz
Welcome to cisco's new licensing model. It will drive you insane if you don't
engage your sales rep before placing an order, or at least reading through
their site...
Sent from my iPad
On 18 Dec 2011, at 01:21, Andriy Bilous andriy.bil...@gmail.com wrote:
You gonna need DATA license to
On 2011-12-17 22:57, Righa Shake wrote:
Hi,
Am trying to configure MPLS on a cisco 3945 with the below features however
the command mpls ip, or tag-switching are not accessible.
You need 'data' license for MPLS. You should have trial option if that's
newly shipped 3900, as it's now shipped
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:48:36PM +0100, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2011-12-18 14:03, Robert Hass wrote:
What size of FIB for IPv4/IPv6 has ASR 901 ? I cannot find this
information in documentation and datasheets.
It's 12k for IPv4 + 8k ARP entries (local hosts).
IPv6 is not supported
On 18/12/2011, at 2:28 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
I still remember a friend of mine buying 4x 7500s filled
with VIPs and ?Supervisors?… Every card, and even the
chassis all had problems! But it was not that the cards
didn't work - they booted, came on line, and then
crashed after 2 days, etc. He
On 2011-12-18 21:03, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:48:36PM +0100, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2011-12-18 14:03, Robert Hass wrote:
What size of FIB for IPv4/IPv6 has ASR 901 ? I cannot find this
information in documentation and datasheets.
It's 12k for IPv4 + 8k ARP
You need 'data' license for MPLS. You should have trial option if that's
newly shipped 3900, as it's now shipped with grace period of 600+ weeks.
600+ *weeks*!? A 10 year trial period is nice :-) If that's the
default, I might be less negative about the licensing system.
--
Pelle
RFC1925,
On 2011-12-18 23:19, Per Carlson wrote:
You need 'data' license for MPLS. You should have trial option if that's
newly shipped 3900, as it's now shipped with grace period of 600+ weeks.
600+ *weeks*!? A 10 year trial period is nice :-) If that's the
default, I might be less negative about the
That came in 15.0(4)M iirc, called 'right-to-use' license and
basically reverts to the old licensing model. The juggling with PAKs
was a nightmare.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Per Carlson pe...@hemmop.com wrote:
You need 'data' license for MPLS. You should have trial option if that's
On Monday, December 19, 2011 04:26:37 AM Andrew Miehs wrote:
Hi Mark,
this wasn't meant a s speed comparison, but rather what
can go wrong if you buy second hand without service.
Agree.
We've had 7200's fail on us, both new and refurbished.
Either way, getting a yearly renewable support
Looks like 5.2.3 has been deferred, 5.2.3a has been posted because of this
bug identified last week:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/5_x/nx-os/deferral/Deferral_Notice_N7K_523.html
Reason for Deferral:
DDTS No(s):
It's too bad that they don't have a release that supports both IPv6 PBR and
DHCPv6-PD with static route insertion.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 7:28 AM
LinkedIn
Kashif Shafeeq requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
Vishal,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Kashif
Accept invitation from Kashif Shafeeq
20 matches
Mail list logo
