Hi,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:40:47PM -0400, Jeff Crowe wrote:
I am planning on migrating a legacy network that utilizes VLAN 1 on Cisco
devices for it's core network to another VLAN ID (100 in this case).
Is there any gotcha's that I should be aware of? All the switches and
routers have
Hi,
as we need the RTR/Track feature from the 12.3T for a project, I was
wondering which relase would be considered safe for production use ...
I did the preliminary tests with the 12.3.8T11 release, but saw there's
a -14.T7 out ... or should I move over to the regular 12.4 release instead?
I'm currently looking into a replacement for our redundant set of 7200
routers (non-VXR) that are doing our DSL l2tp-Tunnels ... currently,
both routers run at around 20-25% CPU load (peak). We possibly will get
a large batch of additional dial-ins soon, which would probably be too
much for
Garry wrote on Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:48 AM:
Hi,
as we need the RTR/Track feature from the 12.3T for a project, I was
wondering which relase would be considered safe for production use
...
I did the preliminary tests with the 12.3.8T11 release, but saw
there's a -14.T7 out ... or
I don't know if I have understood your scenario properly. But based on your
description it looks like you also have one ip address from the office
network in the router. Now as u correctly said it's a normal behavior and if
you want to stop this u have two options.
1. Put the office vlan
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Bernd Ueberbacher wrote:
I've got a bit of a strange question... I have a small Cisco Router with
some VLANs and a Catalyst behind. If I connect one office to the switch
in a seperate VLAN with an official IP address, the person can reach
everything, but in my case (or
Mohacsi Janos wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Zahid Hassan wrote:
Dear All,
I am carrying full feed Internet (219K) plus VPNv4 routes (1K)
on an OSR-7609 with SUP-2/PFC2.
I seems to be getting intermittent packets drops and loss of
connectivity from CPEs terminating on this OSR.
I
hi
i have two 4503 switches which are connected eachother as trunk via wireless.
switch A (user As) Layer 2 vlans vlan 1, vlan 10, vlan 20, vlan 100, vlan 200
layer3 vlan interfacesvlan 10: 192.168.10.0 (default
gateway for PCs in network A )
Hi everyone. I'm trying to find a way to rate-limit or police to 3Mbps
two of the switch ports on an 1811 router. I have configured both FE
ports as follows:
interface FastEthernet2
switchport access vlan 10
load-interval 30
!
interface FastEthernet9
switchport access vlan 10
HI,
why don't you try ACL or VRF ...
Hope this help
Cheers
--
Paolo Riviello
Home: http://www.paoloriviello.com
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-mail msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: pao_rivi
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament. -H-
From: Bernd Ueberbacher [EMAIL
Tom Zingale (tomz) wrote:
Yes on a vlan or port you can allow/deny tcp/ip traffic. See the docs
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps5528/products_
configuration_guide_chapter09186a008081da63.html
Does this same feature (per port IP ACLs on a L2 interface) work on the
I'm looking for ways to simplify some large router configs that have many
sub-interfaces either for specific DLCIs, VCs, or VLANs. Is there a
document somewhere that describes which properties or attributes of a main
interface are automatically inherited by its sub-interfaces? So far,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:02:07PM -0400, Sean Shepard wrote:
Thank you for the reply on this. We did exactly what you mention here
(trying to isolate channels) and found the performance metrics didn't change
very much except that there seemed to be little impairment with just a
single T-1.
Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote on Wednesday, June 06, 2007 4:39 PM:
Does anybody know of an easy way to tell if a 12000 card is
channelized? I am new to the 12000 series and we are looking to
buy an oc12 that channelizes to DS1 level. We keep running across
people selling things like:
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 10:24 -0400, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
New to list...
Could anyone on this list help with the correct config for NETFLOW
EXPORT for version 9 on a CISCO 6500 with SUP-720-3B running 12.2.18-SXF.
We are trying to export the flows to a QRadar device but the date
Can you post the related parts of the configs you're using. I recently went
down this road and it might help.
- Original Message -
From: Voll, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:47 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] IPSec tunnel up but no Traffic
I
2801 config below. I don't think it's on the concentrator side as I've
done other Lan-to-Lan's on them without problems.
Scott
!
!
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr aes 256
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key 6 ### address a.b.c.41
!
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime
Hi,
I'm looking for info on what would be technically equivalent to one
redundant juniper m120 configuration in terms of cisco hardware.
Requirements are :
- redundant PSU
- redundant routing engine
- ability to take 4 full BGP views and about 25 peers
- 10 interfaces, gigabit ethernet type
-
Hello,
I would like to know if is possible to configure different MTU size per
sub-interface in the same interface from a router.
Thanks
A.A.A.A.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Resolution was indeed increasing the output queue size. Looks like around
160 to 240 (for bonded 2xT1 and 3xT1) seemed to do the trick. Testing today
has been tremendously positive. CEF does appear to be okay on MLPPP that
far back (woo-hoo!).
Thanks for your assistance and feedback!
Sean
Best bang for the buck is going to be the 7600 w/SUP720 or RSP720.
The XR12000 (GSR) models will work as well, but the Ethernet cost on
those is going to be high. Not as high as on a M120, but higher than
the 7600.
Phil
On Jun 6, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Auquier Benoit wrote:
Hi,
I'm
I think you have missed some important factors:
Do you need totally non-overbooked linecards?
What are your QoS requirements, will LAN type QoS (small buffers and
few queues) suffice for your needs, or do you need hierarchical
shaping and deep buffers?
Also - is the fact that VLANs are
If you do choose the 7600, make sure you get the 720-BXL, it
supports double the flow table size and larger TCAM for fast switching.
We use 720-3B with 3Full BGPs but had to increase TCAM allotment for IP
V4 flows vs IP v6 and Multicast, to reduce route processor CPU load due
to flows
Thanks everyone for your help with this problem:
I have a very simple network with about 5 linux servers, a cisco
3500XL switch and a 2600 router.
There is a problem with servers that have very little or no traffic.
The network interfaces on the low traffic servers seems to become
Hi all,
I'm quite newbie in this field. So far, in my current company, I've done
some PoC using Cisco WAAS and Packeteer PacketShaperXpress (the one with
Acceleration Compression module).
For your requirements, how much WAN bandwidth do you have? What is each
connection type? Is it a
I am looking to replace my 7513's that I use for T1 aggregation with
something like a Turin Networks TPE1200R and connect them to our 6500's
via 802.1q and gig ethernet.
The TPE1200 will terminate 12 Channelized DS3s and connect to the 6500
via dot1q for termination of the traffic. I like the
You could do it with event manager combined with ip sla, not sure if
your equipment supports it though.
Ben
Scott Dunn wrote:
Hi Group,
I had 2 x 3835 running eBGP for WAN redundancy (primary/shadow) and
running HSRP for LAN failover to 1 switch. I've recently added a
second switch, so now
27 matches
Mail list logo
