Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

hi virendra, Per packet load sharing is CPU intensive and if you are running something like voice then it is not recommended that you run per packet. Even with per packet you will never get exact load sharing for both links. Best Regards Raymond On Dec 10, 2007 4:39 AM, virendra rode // [EMAIL

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 05:39:07PM -0800, virendra rode // wrote: [snip] In order to distribute traffic (load-sharing) across two links I'm looking at enabling equal cost traffic (per-packet load sharing) going out both serial links as their data processing is overloading one link. The equal

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:14:37AM +0300, Raymond Macharia wrote: hi virendra, Per packet load sharing is CPU intensive CPU intensive for who? and if you are running something like voice then it is not recommended that you run per packet. Even with per packet you will never get exact

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: Hi Rode i believe that according for GRE order of operation , GRE encapsulation occurs first then routing decesion will be taken based on destination address of GRE-Encapsualted headers means that you will need 2

Re: [c-nsp] Flowmask Config?

Do a show mls netflow flowmask Nat requires interface full flow Take a look here http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SXF/native/configuration/guide/netflow.html Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [c-nsp] Flowmask Config?

I knew someone else out there would see this problem. Skeeve the problem is the you can't run QOS and NDE concurrently. Both NDE and QOS use the same TCAM hardware and therefor you can't have two different FLOWMASKS. This rule applies to any QOS feature like UBRL User Based Rate

Re: [c-nsp] Configure IP helper via SNMP?

Drew Weaver wrote: Does anyone know if there is a way to do per vlan configuration of the IP helper commands via SNMP, we would like to only have it enabled when systems need to be pxe-booted, although I suppose we could always have it enabled and control whether or not the system pxeboots

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

The thing is the cef is load-balancing packets across equal-cost links on a per-destination which is how its suppose to be which I get it. The issue is my tunnel traffic is destined to a single core router on the far end of the links consuming the majority of the BW for any single link.

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Graham wrote: The thing is the cef is load-balancing packets across equal-cost links on a per-destination which is how its suppose to be which I get it. The issue is my tunnel traffic is destined to a single core router on the far end of the

Re: [c-nsp] Configure IP helper via SNMP?

although I suppose we could always have it enabled and control whether or not the system pxeboots via the dhcpd configuration (both was the original plan...) I'm guessing that the PXE boot is being done for installations, in which case you really don't want to depend on whether the helper

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 09:36:56AM -0800, virendra rode // wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Graham wrote: The thing is the cef is load-balancing packets across equal-cost links on a per-destination which is how its suppose to be which I get it. The issue is my

Re: [c-nsp] MLPPP support on a 2651XM

Yes, I believe you can. Dave. Justin Shore wrote: Can anyone tell me if MLPPP is supported on a 2651XM with 2x WIC-1DSU-T1 (might be a V2s) and a VWIC-2MFT-T1 mounted on a NM-2W? The router and WICs are pre-existing and the customer needs to double their bandwidth. It's cheaper to buy

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rodney Dunn wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 09:36:56AM -0800, virendra rode // wrote: Kevin Graham wrote: The thing is the cef is load-balancing packets across equal-cost links on a per-destination which is how its suppose to be which I get it. The

Re: [c-nsp] Configure IP helper via SNMP?

Hi Drew, On Dec 11, 2007 5:30 AM, Drew Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, we were going to use both 'whether the helper address was configured' and whether the MAC address of the NIC (which would've been configured dynamically via an application in which it gets added/removed

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aamer Akhter (aakhter) wrote: Veranda, Have you looked at PfR (Performance Routing) to distribute the flows across the links? Differently that the CEF hash, PfR has flow and link utilization awareness, and can very granularly move flows

Re: [c-nsp] per-packet load sharing.

Hi Virendra, OER/PfR is there in one form in 12.3 and 12.4. But the real support and many of the really nice functions are going to be in 12.4T. Regards, -- Aamer Akhter / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ent Commercial Systems, cisco Systems -Original Message- From: virendra rode //

Re: [c-nsp] One or two policy and class maps?

To answer my own question, almost two months later: we settled on using an 'any any' for our ACL and since I'm told this is done in hardware, it doesn't really matter if there are one or two class maps. We can only do policing, not shaping, because we're not working with OSMs. Yes, the traffic

[c-nsp] cisco acs v3.3

Hi All, A quick thanks up front for any help. Had our Cisco ACS box die, but managed to get the hard drive to mount in Linux and copied the CiscoSecure ACS v3.3 folder off the drive. Built up a new box and replaced the default CiscoSecure ACS v3.3 with the old servers folder. All the user/group

[c-nsp] 10G LFS function

Hi, Does cisco products support LFS function of 802.3ae? We have a WS-X6704-10GE. Regards, Hiromasa ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] underruns error locally inputs errors, runts and abort on remote interface

Hello, I'm seeing underruns errors on local STM1 interface, on the remote router i'm seeing runts, aborts and imput errors the controller is clean(during a certain period). a policy map is created on the local router since there is lot of output traffic Policy Map Shaper Class class-default