On 11/3/2013 1:41 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Nov 3, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
If enough of us complain... maybe.
Plenty of people inside and outside of Cisco have complained vociferously, to
no avail. It's unlikely to change.
Maybe we should all go back to
On Sunday, November 03, 2013 07:28:18 AM John Neiberger
wrote:
It was in beta for months before they released it
publicly. I think the current version is vastly better
than when I first saw it. But I guess they didn't have
any Mac users in the beta. :)
Of course, no one at Cisco uses a Mac
On Sunday, November 03, 2013 07:52:33 AM Jeff Kell wrote:
Maybe we should all go back to the phone call interface.
Will probably get Bangalore, but who knows. Refuse the
web garbage :)
Make every case a Priority 1 case (call if you the
description command on your CLI fails, as a P1 log) -
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 09:20:07PM -0600, Alex Presse wrote:
It's the new java update - unsigned code gets user verification windows.
Cisco (and everybody else) will need to update all their java delivered user
interfaces to avoid this annoyance.
Why on earth does enter information for
Hi Adam,
Update on the issues reported for LACP,
LACP QOS - Planned for July 2014.
“multicast ingress to port-channel punted to CPU” - Fixed in 15.3(3)S1 and
available on Cisco.com
BFD with ASR9K - ASR9K BFD over Bundle feature has gone through changes in
4.3.0 or later builds and hence
Hi all I was working on a test LAB on GNS3 , the Lab contains both IPv4 and
IPv6 with different routing protocolsThe starnge issue is that when I issue the
show ip bgp on one of the routers
I find the IP address 32.1.1.146 as a next-hopdid anyone face this before ?
I thought that by clicking each warning it was just a hidden way to
authorize Obama to spy your network issue LMAO
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
I use Solarwinds NCM
On 31 October 2013 12:02, Ahmet Uncu uncuah...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I need to configure about 300 cisco routers/switches same time. Could
you offer me a free software that can do this?IT looks like ciscocmd
can do this, but it has lack of documentation since I am
Since when was that free?
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Since I didn't read the email properly, it's very good though.
On 3 November 2013 11:09, Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Since when was that free?
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
___
cisco-nsp
It's not just the TAC tool that has been suck-ified. The replacement for
the dynamic configuration tool sucks. Tried it a few days ago, first thing
it asks for is a whole bunch of customer info. I just wanted to verify if
there is a non-EOS OC-3 POS that would work with a 6500. Painful. Today
Hi,
Hi all I was working on a test LAB on GNS3 , the Lab contains both IPv4 and
IPv6 with different routing protocolsThe starnge issue is that when I issue
the show ip bgp on one of the routers
I find the IP address 32.1.1.146 as a next-hopdid anyone face this before ?
Hi Sander and thanks for the replyI actually converted the numbers into
hexadecimal , and am running dual stacked network IPv4 and IPv6but how am going
to block this IP address from appearing in the show ip bgp output ?
Thanks again
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Strange IP address
From:
Hi,
Hi Sander and thanks for the reply
I actually converted the numbers into hexadecimal , and am running dual
stacked network IPv4 and IPv6
but how am going to block this IP address from appearing in the show ip bgp
output ?
Same answer as before: Can you show your config? I don't
This is a bug. Cisco has lots of these and I've seen this many times before.
Open a case or email your account team to have it reported and fixed.
Jared Mauch
On Nov 3, 2013, at 4:09 AM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Hi all I was working on a test LAB on GNS3 , the Lab contains both IPv4
On 11/3/2013 7:46 AM, Chuck Church wrote:
It's not just the TAC tool that has been suck-ified. The replacement for
the dynamic configuration tool sucks. Tried it a few days ago, first thing
it asks for is a whole bunch of customer info. I just wanted to verify if
there is a non-EOS OC-3 POS
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Nov 3, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:
It would be great if Cisco focus-group tested these 'enhancements'
before rolling them out, and knock it off with the Java nonsense.
They've been going in this direction
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013, Jeff Kell wrote:
Customer support died a decade ago.
For the front-end stuff, sure.
To be fair, and to give credit where credit is due, I have dealt with some
TAC engineers who have been incredibly helpful, professional, and
responsive. For the things I generally reach
What is DFC bootflash for?
#dir dfc#3-bootflash:/
No files in directory
on the other card it just reports error when I try to show the DFC
bootflash and it's not reporting the size of DFC bootflash
When I tried to upgrade the rommon on the WS-X6704-10GE with DFC3BXL, one
card reported error
Hi,
There¹s at least two alternatives you can use. You either need to use a
route-map under AF ipv4 to change the next-hop explicitly for the ipv4
prefixes or you can run a separate session for v4 ad v6 prefixes
respectively. The latter is generally recommended.
Regards
Harold
Le 2013-11-03
Hello,
I am working on a Cisco 3750X switch and have noticed that the menu
command isn't available with IOS versions 12.2 as well as 15.2 I am trying
to set up a few simple commands as Menu options. Is there any other simple
way to do it, with the Menu command not being available?
*Ali Sumsam *
Take a look at EMM - Embedded Menu Manager (not to confuse with EEM)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/netmgmt/configuration/guide/nm_emm_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Thanks Pete!!!
We are using ASR 1001 series , can configure but I want to make sure before
doing it
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Pete Lumbis alum...@gmail.com wrote:
Most platforms can't do this in hardware and have to punt the SYN and/or
SYN/ACK packets. Use caution at scale
On Fri,
23 matches
Mail list logo
