Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Hi, > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 08:06 -0800, ps...@cisco.com wrote: >> Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer >> Overflow Vulnerability >> >> Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160210-asa-ike > Poor bastards stuck at 8.2 (like us) might be relieved to know that > there actually is a

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

...on Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:50:36PM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 08:06 -0800, ps...@cisco.com wrote: > > Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160210-asa-ike > Poor bastards stuck at 8.2 (like us) might be relieved to know that > there actually is a 8.2(5)59 version with the fix.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Thank you Upgraded ) From: vinny_abe...@dell.com [mailto:vinny_abe...@dell.com] Sent: 15 February 2016 22:32 To: dwhit...@cisco.com; Nick Cutting; pe...@rathlev.dk; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

FWIW, I believe the ASA 5505, 5510, 5520, 5540, and 5550's have always been the identical images, with the exception of the 5505's also supporting 9.2.x. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David White, Jr. (dwhitejr) Sent: Monday,

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

The non -smp image is also posted (for the 5505). Look on the 5505 download page under: All Releases --> Interim --> 8 --> 8.2.5 Interim Sincerely, David. On 2/15/16 3:43 PM, Nick Cutting wrote: This is best news I've heard all day. Was going to have to move 55 VPNs by

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

This is best news I've heard all day. Was going to have to move 55 VPNs by hand.. I have this for the 5510 - I cannot see a release for the 5505 - will this also be coming? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 08:06 -0800, ps...@cisco.com wrote: > Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer > Overflow Vulnerability > > Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160210-asa-ike Poor bastards stuck at 8.2 (like us) might be relieved to know that there actually is a 8.2(5)59

Re: [c-nsp] TX low alarm warning

Hi, > For some reason especially on 4500X 3.7 code we have also seen this message > on ports which are left no shut, and they have an SFP in it. It was > seriously polluting our logs so we wrote this: +1 > logging discriminator LOGFILTER mnemonics drops > SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION > logging

Re: [c-nsp] TX low alarm warning

For some reason especially on 4500X 3.7 code we have also seen this message on ports which are left no shut, and they have an SFP in it. It was seriously polluting our logs so we wrote this: logging discriminator LOGFILTER mnemonics drops SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION logging host x.y.z.w

Re: [c-nsp] TX low alarm warning

Hi, The few I've had were fiber strand related, a poorly seated or dirty patch cord connection. best! jim On 2/15/2016 6:43 AM, Harry Hambi - Atos wrote: Hi all, Getting the following error Jan 27 04:06:25.811 GMT: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te4/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value:

Re: [c-nsp] TX low alarm warning

I've seen it with a bad gbic / sfp as well. All you can really do is start checking. Fiber, jumpers, etc. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Karsten Thomann wrote: > Usually it is caused by a broken fiber, but you will never know for sure > until you checked it. > >

Re: [c-nsp] TX low alarm warning

Usually it is caused by a broken fiber, but you will never know for sure until you checked it. Gesendet von meinem BlackBerry   Originalnachricht   Von: Harry Hambi - Atos Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2016 12:44 An: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' Betreff: [c-nsp] TX low alarm warning Hi all,

[c-nsp] TX low alarm warning

Hi all, Getting the following error Jan 27 04:06:25.811 GMT: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te4/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm. Does this point to a fibre or gbic error?. Any suggestions appreciated. Other end of link not alarming. Rgds Harry

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR1002-X Licensing Question

On 15 February 2016 at 04:24, Troy Boutso wrote: > I understand I couldn't lodge cases to the TAC etc or get any support for > anything operating within the confines of the RTU licensing but I am more > intersted in this for LAB/Personal use to stress test equipment out of