I feel problem is not in config, but what clamd does when no config has
been set on that new function (tipical situation when you upgrade and
new features are available).
Even when example configs keep the state OFF, what happens when no
config has been set for that feature?
On minor
Christoph Cordes wrote:
we thought a bit about this, and here's the solution that could
satisfy everyone (TM):
for clamd we could provide different configfiles, depending on the
needs the user can choose between 3 - or more templates, like:
But you are missing the point. The problem is
On 11/16/07, rick pim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David F. Skoll writes:
But you are missing the point. The problem is not the
configfiles. Anyone
can easily edit a config file.
The problem is that new behaviour suddenly appears when using an *old*
configfile. It's the hard-coded
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, rick pim wrote:
who on earth upgrades from one beta to another and uses the same
configfile???
If you're using clamscan, the config file doesn't enter into it, but the
default behavior still changes. You need to pass a flag to turn off the
phishing checks.
I get the whole
David F. Skoll writes:
But you are missing the point. The problem is not the configfiles. Anyone
can easily edit a config file.
The problem is that new behaviour suddenly appears when using an *old*
configfile. It's the hard-coded defaults in the source that are the problem.
i'm
Hello,
we thought a bit about this, and here's the solution that could
satisfy everyone (TM):
for clamd we could provide different configfiles, depending on the
needs the user can choose between 3 - or more templates, like:
failsafe - most reliable
standard - higher chance for a fp but also
Hello all.
We've had some consultant make the spurious claim that Clam AV only scans for
'windows viruses' and is really only useful for 'scanning email'.
Despite the fact that I know this to be patently false, is there documentation
out there I can slap him with that clearly indicates that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
We've had some consultant make the spurious claim that Clam AV only scans for
'windows viruses' and is really only useful for 'scanning email'.
Despite the fact that I know this to be patently false, is there
documentation out there I can slap him with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
We've had some consultant make the spurious claim that Clam AV only scans for
'windows viruses' and is really only useful for 'scanning email'.
Despite the fact that I know this to be patently false, is there
documentation out there I can slap him with
rick pim wrote:
who on earth upgrades
from one beta to another and uses the same configfile???
Who on earth uses clamav in a way that requires a config file!? how
barbaric!
Any solution which only solves this problem via config file and/or
command line switches is an unacceptable solution.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
We've had some consultant make the spurious claim that Clam AV only scans for
'windows viruses' and is really only useful for 'scanning email'.
Despite the fact that I know this to be patently false, is there
documentation out there I can slap him with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/16/2007 02:52:34 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
We've had some consultant make the spurious claim that Clam AV
only scans for 'windows viruses' and is really only useful for
'scanning email'.
Despite the fact that I know this to be patently
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/16/2007 02:52:34 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
We've had some consultant make the spurious claim that Clam AV
only scans for 'windows viruses' and is really only useful for
'scanning email'.
Despite
Well 'security expert' is just a title. Heck, anyone can call themselves
a security expert and if you just need another security expert to
refute his/her claim personally with some marketing jargon to do with
it, I'm sure anyone here would volunteer, in absence of that I will
volunteer as a
Michael Brown wrote:
Well 'security expert' is just a title.
Absolutely. If a so-called security expert actually uses Windoze,
deduct 50 points. :-)
We use ClamAV, but no Windows -- our company is completely Linux-based.
I figure we're well ahead of 99% of so-called security experts with
that
On Nov 16, 2007 3:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
We've had some consultant make the spurious claim that Clam AV only scans for
'windows viruses' and is really only useful for 'scanning email'.
Despite the fact that I know this to be patently false, is there
documentation out
16 matches
Mail list logo
