On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any thoughts about how we can get the stats to you, so that
you can use them, without bypassing our mechanism for ensuring
consistent and safe updating of our virus signatures?
There's a special option in
On 2008-10-17 05:11, René Berber wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
0.94.1 RC1 was published on schedule yesterday.
[snip]
Has anyone seen a problem testing with the contents of test/.split?
In particular 'clamscan test/.split/split.clam.exe.htmlaa' just holds
the CPU at 100% for a long
There's a special option in freshclam (--submit-stats, currently
deactivated)
Hi Tomasz, from how I'd use it here, it'd certainly be a good idea to
enable this option.
As a side note, for users of the windows port... they'd normally run
freshclam damonised... and then could run the special
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:52 +0100 (BST)
Steve Basford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a special option in freshclam (--submit-stats, currently
deactivated)
Hi Tomasz, from how I'd use it here, it'd certainly be a good idea to
enable this option.
As a side note, for users of the
On 2008-10-16 23:19, Hans Morten Kind wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:29:02PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
Please open a bug on bugs.clamav.net, and attach your gdb backtrace.
Also please attach one sample that reproduce the bug to the bugzilla.
Thanks for your prompt and friendly
Török Edwin wrote:
Scanning test/.split works here:
Thanks, I'm probably hitting an obscure system bug...
What OS/compiler are you using?
...in unsupported Cygwin. Almost everything else seems to work,
exceptions being 'clamscan --debug', and the programs used to check the
build.
I'll
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any thoughts about how we can get the stats to you, so that
you can use them, without bypassing our mechanism for ensuring
consistent and safe updating of our virus signatures?
You
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:11:16PM -0500, René Berber wrote:
Has anyone seen a problem testing with the contents of test/.split?
In particular 'clamscan test/.split/split.clam.exe.htmlaa' just holds
the CPU at 100% for a long time... I've killed it on two runs.
no problem here:
Compiles cleanly on OpenBSD 4.3 Release i386 on AMD Opteron
Best regards,
Walter.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Hi,
We've got a user whose files are being detected as
Worm.Mydoom.M.log. These ones all happen to be PDF files saved
from Word 2007.
There is an example at the following URL:
http://www.le.ac.uk/its/mcn4/clamav/incorrect_mydoom_detect.pdf
I submitted the file via the clamav web page a few days
Hi,
We've got a user whose files are being detected as
Worm.Mydoom.M.log. These ones all happen to be PDF files saved
from Word 2007.
I know this doesn't help... but...looks like that name is a special hard
coded name:
special.c:
int cli_check_mydoom_log(int desc, const char **virname)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc 4.0.1 caused configuration failure with PR bug 28045
Just a FYI...
Apple has released a new Xcode pack with a working gcc. It's a bit
annoying as it requires to register on apple developers site and to
download a whole dvd image but it works perfectly with -O2
Hi,
Thanks both for the useful info.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:54:52AM +0100, Steve Basford wrote:
I know this doesn't help... but...looks like that name is a special hard
coded name:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:32:38PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
as a temporary solution you can run the
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:23:06PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:53:08 +0100
Matthew Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great, thanks - all test files I have now scan OK.
Does the above alter much else in the scanning?
No, it doesn't.
Excellent, thanks.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:50:50AM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
Is it the latest Sun compiler?
Does it also crash if you don't use any optimizations? (CFLAGS only -g)
Does it crash if you use gcc?
I have reinstalled 0.94 using gcc, the problem disappered.
I have tested both with 32 and 64-bit
On 2008-10-17 19:54, Hans Morten Kind wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:50:50AM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
Is it the latest Sun compiler?
Does it also crash if you don't use any optimizations? (CFLAGS only -g)
Does it crash if you use gcc?
I have reinstalled 0.94 using gcc, the
Nigel Horne wrote:
Folks,
We are pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate
for ClamAV 0.94.1. 0.94.1RC1 is scheduled for release on Wednesday (15/10/08).
Nigel,
Everything works on gcc-3.3.6 with Redhat FC1. I managed to install
check and perform the checks with
Are the following warnings anything to worry about, or is this a libmilter
issue?
clamav-milter.c: In function ‘clamfi_connect’:
clamav-milter.c:2868: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘hosts_ctl’ discards
qualifiers from pointer target type
clamav-milter.c: In function ‘clamfi_eom’:
On 2008-10-17 21:26, Jason Bertoch wrote:
Are the following warnings anything to worry about, or is this a libmilter
issue?
clamav-milter.c: In function ‘clamfi_connect’:
clamav-milter.c:2868: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘hosts_ctl’ discards
qualifiers from pointer target type
Please do open a bug and attach the file that was crashing when compiled
with the old Sun C.
Have done, however the servers runnning solaris10 were already upgraded,
so the bug reported is produced on solaris9 with an even older SUNWspro.
hmk
___
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:19:54AM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any thoughts about how we can get the stats to you, so that
you can use them, without bypassing our mechanism for ensuring
consistent and safe
21 matches
Mail list logo
