Java/C

1999-02-18 Thread Bernd Kreimeier
Daniel Rall writes: This is for whoever was asking about a Java/C gadget. http://www.irisa.fr/compose/harissa/ Nah, this is Java to C. What I want is a stock dumb tool that automatically creates an ugly Java source from a C source. The idea is to map all C functions to static methods of a

Re: JDK source code

1999-02-18 Thread Moses DeJong
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Michael Emmel wrote: Ah... just being safe. There is nothing in the license agreement that I can see that stops someone who signed it from doing a clean room implementation as long as the Sun source is not referenced. Correct? ..darcy I recently posted a

Re: JDK source code

1999-02-18 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 17, 1999, Alex Nicolaou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, you've done something cool, and you want to give it to someone. In this case, the license binds you to two main restrictions. The first is that code in the JDK that you've modified must be returned to Sun for inclusion in the

Re: JDK source code

1999-02-18 Thread Alexander Nicolaou
On Feb 18, 1999, Alex Nicolaou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you only want to use your changes for research purposes - for students studying the ideas you have, for example, or as part of a thesis - you're not stuck. If you want to distribute the working code to end-users who aren't

Re: JDK source code

1999-02-18 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 18, 1999, Alexander Nicolaou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In other words, if the transitive closure of all your users and their users are all using the software for research, you can distribute it freely and without payment or validation by Sun. Well, if Sun's license really allows me to

CVS fixed?

1999-02-18 Thread John Keiser
I added a new directory, and telnetted up there like usual to fix the directory permissions ... and lo and behold, they look like they're correct! Did someone fix it? Could someone do a cvs update -d and check it? --John "All great truths begin as blasphemies." - George Bernard Shaw

Re: CVS fixed?

1999-02-18 Thread Paul Fisher
"John Keiser" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did someone fix it? It's been fixed for a while -- of course, `cvs diff' doesn't work, so there are still problems with GNU's cvs setup. :) BTW, please switch to using [EMAIL PROTECTED] for emails to the mailing list. It's quite possible that the MX