Brian Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:40:12 -0400:
I've decided it is time for me to hand the reins over and let someone
else lead this project.
Thanks, Brian, for everything you have done for Classpath.
-- Sascha
Sascha Brawer, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 14. Juli 2003 09:46 schrieb Mark Wielaard:
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 07:50, Michael Koch wrote:
* java/net/ServerSocket.java,
java/net/Socket.java: New versions from libgcj.
If possible I would like to see the original
Hi Brian,
--- Brian Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I've decided it is time for me to hand the reins over and let someone
else lead this project. I have really enjoyed acting as maintainer
for a number of years now and think it has given me really good
insights into free software
Mark == Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark - java.util.zip
Mark How to modularize to allow multiple implementations to coexist?
Mark (See what classes are different between classpath/gcj)
Here's a handy URL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/java/libgcj-classpath-compare.html
Note that the
On Monday 14 July 2003 00:11, Mark Wielaard wrote:
- javax.comm stuff
- Kaffe has incomplete stubs
- There is the rxtx (sp?) project which has been usable.
(Check kaffe mailinglist archives)
They have ported to lots of platforms
- Wonka also has a implementation... (Status?)
Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:46:08 +0200:
http://www.dandelis.ch/development/fonts/
I've updated the page to reflect the current state. I did not bother
updating the code snapshot, since I'd like to clean up things and bring
my implementation a bit further. If
Mark Wielaard wrote:
- We should have a standard NotYetImplementedException. Just returning
something random (like null) from stubs is really not
acceptable. Kaffe for example has one.
In the gcj list I suggested UnsupportedOperationException, with a
refinement:
throw new
Hi Chris,
I've CC:ed Trent Jarvi, the maintainer of rxtx, see http://www.rxtx.org
for more information about it.
Chris Gray wrote:
On Monday 14 July 2003 00:11, Mark Wielaard wrote:
- javax.comm stuff
- Kaffe has incomplete stubs
- There is the rxtx (sp?) project which has been usable.
Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark - Security/Crypto - Choose default provider
Mark (kaffe, GNU Classpath and/or GNU Crypto).
For libgcj we've settled on recommending GNU Crypto as the choice (we
don't ship it by default). GNU Crypto is actively maintained by
friendly people --
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi Chris,
I've CC:ed Trent Jarvi, the maintainer of rxtx, see http://www.rxtx.org
for more information about it.
Chris Gray wrote:
On Monday 14 July 2003 00:11, Mark Wielaard wrote:
- javax.comm stuff
- Kaffe has incomplete stubs
Hi Trent,
Trent Jarvi wrote:
We'd be more than willing to work with Classpath and or Kaffe to get this
working. RXTX 2.1 implements CommAPI from the top down but is in package
gnu.io to avoid confusion with Sun's impementation.
RXTX 2.0 implements the lower portion of CommAPI and could be made
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi Trent,
Trent Jarvi wrote:
We'd be more than willing to work with Classpath and or Kaffe to get this
working. RXTX 2.1 implements CommAPI from the top down but is in package
gnu.io to avoid confusion with Sun's impementation.
RXTX 2.0
Hi everyone,
Mark Wielaard has already said that I'd like the next free software java
develeper meeting to be in Saarbruecken, which hosts the Linux Kongress
from October 14 to October 16, 2003. I hope we can use this Kongress as
an oppportunity to present the current state of free java
Hi,
I
submitted a patch (#1686) for this about two weeks ago. The change
to java.lang.String is actually fairly important for Jikes RVM (our implementation
of String.intern is buggy on classpath until this goes in). Should
I resubmit as two patches to make it easier for someone to apply the
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 00:02, David P Grove wrote:
I submitted a patch (#1686) for this about two weeks ago. The
change to java.lang.String is actually fairly important for Jikes RVM
I already looked at them and they look OK, but I wanted to test them out
with at least one
On Monday 14 July 2003 21:05, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi everyone,
Mark Wielaard has already said that I'd like the next free software java
develeper meeting to be in Saarbruecken, which hosts the Linux Kongress
from October 14 to October 16, 2003. I hope we can use this Kongress as
an
16 matches
Mail list logo
