Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 13 Aug 2003 01:05:31 +0200:
I would really like everybody to follow the ChangeLog entry guidelines
given in:
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/changelogs/guile-changelogs_3.html
Here's a question about ChangeLog entries: Would it make sense to have
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 00:30, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I have put up a new test release:
http://www.klomp.org/mark/classpath/classpath-0.06-test3.tar.gz
(Note that I disabled the actual API generation since that just takes to
much time. I will generate a new set tonight and put it up
Hello classpath-ers,
I wanted to check for the old 0.05 - release, but the link on the
classpath-homepage leads to an error. Where can I get the older releases?
Ciao,
Peter
___
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 20:35, Peter Werno wrote:
I wanted to check for the old 0.05 - release, but the link on the
classpath-homepage leads to an error. Where can I get the older releases?
We are still checking the integrity of some of these files.
See
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 08:05, Sascha Brawer wrote:
Here's a question about ChangeLog entries: Would it make sense to have
separate commits (and thus ChangeLog entries) for unrelated changes?
Yes for completely unrelated changes they should be committed seperately
(especially when doing a
Hi,
I think this is as good as it gets for 0.06. The only real change with
test-3 is that I disabled generation of the API documentation during the
make dist because the API doc doesn't look completely right (some
encoding problems) and I am not sure what to do with the copyright
statement at the
Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 00:30, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I have put up a new test release:
http://www.klomp.org/mark/classpath/classpath-0.06-test3.tar.gz
(Note that I disabled the actual API generation since that just takes to
much time. I will
7 matches
Mail list logo
