Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1

2003-08-25 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 22 Aug 2003 11:05:25 +0100 Nic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would Debian have a problem with this? It's just a dependancy on the package isn't it? Most people will already have libxml2 I suspect. No problem with Debian. But maybe with other JDK/ JRE. What does kaffe, sablevm, jikes, gcj and

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1

2003-08-25 Thread David Bélanger
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:53:01PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: On 22 Aug 2003 11:05:25 +0100 Nic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would Debian have a problem with this? It's just a dependancy on the package isn't it? Most people will already have libxml2 I suspect. No problem with Debian.

RE: GNU Classpath 0.06 created

2003-08-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 08:07, Qiong Cai wrote: Does ORP 1.10 work with this new release? After browsing through the mailing list archives, I cannot find why ORP is broken with the classpath. I don't think Orp will work out of the box with the 0.06 snapshot. But the changes since the last

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1

2003-08-25 Thread Dalibor Topic
Arnaud Vandyck wrote: On 22 Aug 2003 11:05:25 +0100 Nic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would Debian have a problem with this? It's just a dependancy on the package isn't it? Most people will already have libxml2 I suspect. No problem with Debian. But maybe with other JDK/ JRE. What does kaffe,