Re: gtk-peer compile fixes for gcc-2.95

2004-03-26 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 04:00, Tom Tromey wrote: Michael == Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Michael We had this discussion on irc lately because I got a report Michael about this from a user. Tromey said the best solution would Michael be to pass -std=c99 (or similar) to gcc

Re: gtk-peer compile fixes for gcc-2.95

2004-03-26 Thread Michael Koch
Am Freitag, 26. März 2004 11:09 schrieb Mark Wielaard: Hi, On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 04:00, Tom Tromey wrote: Michael == Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Michael We had this discussion on irc lately because I got a report Michael about this from a user. Tromey said the best

Re: gtk-peer compile fixes for gcc-2.95

2004-03-26 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 11:28, Michael Koch wrote: Am Freitag, 26. März 2004 11:09 schrieb Mark Wielaard: I don't believe it is really designed for a particular C-dialect. But it would be nice if it is compilable with gcc-2.95. It seems gcc-2.95 supports -std=c9x so we can switch to

Re: As the Classpath Turns - Introducing Planet Classpath

2004-03-26 Thread Ranjit Mathew
Mark Wielaard wrote: I have setup Planet Classpath: http://classpath.wildebeest.org/planet/ It aggregates some of the diaries written by GNU Classpath, gcj, Kaffe, IKVM.NET, java-gnome, Debian java, Jikes RVM and SableVM hackers. Not always relevant, but always fun to read! You bet! Thanks a

Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues

2004-03-26 Thread C. Brian Jones
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 13:53, Tom Tromey wrote: Etienne == Etienne Gagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Etienne [talking of normal package tree: would anybody object to moving the Etienne whole tree to an src/ subdirectory, as it should be done in such Etienne a big project?] Personally

Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues

2004-03-26 Thread Robert Lougher
Hmmm, To be honest, I can't see the point in adding yet another level. The VM classes aren't that many or very big so it's not a big deal if most of the code is duplicated. You can get carried away with abstraction :) How many times have you had to preprocess a file to understand _exactly_

Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues

2004-03-26 Thread Steven Augart
Etienne Gagnon wrote: It would be impractical (or even maybe impossible) to setup a *single* classpath installation on a user system, meant to be used by distinct VMs/compilers on this same system; I have a counterexample. I just used /usr/local/classpath on my workstation to build JikesRVM