-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Perhaps a better interface (more intuitive) would be something like this:
- --enable-install=[both|classes|zip]
On Thursday 08 April 2004 22:36, Michael Koch wrote:
Hi all,
With my big NIO commit I accidently commited the first part (the parts
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Indeed. The goal is to find the optimal solution that would be spec
compliant, portable and efficient.
and later:
I'm not the one nitpicking about pure ISO C portability (I don't use
JNI, so I couldn't care less), ...
and later:
and is of
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Note: by this logic byte[] is the most portable/generic way to hold
VM private data. It places no portability restrictions, only
(possibly) performance ones. However, I have yet to hear a
convincing argument that proves byte[] is slower than RawData
(or whatever) on ALL
Steven Augart wrote:
If we were to do this in the GNU Classpath Java code, then the only
solution I see is to use a preprocessor, and expand gpointer
to an int or long as appropriate, based upon the standard pointer
representation in that platform's usual ABI.
That wouldn't work for me.
Stuart Ballard wrote:
2) Unusual VMs: Things where JNI-centric assumptions don't
hold true.
For example, IKVM and Jaos(?) don't use JNI at all within
Classpath, and their natural pointer type is just a normal
object reference. gcj with CNI also falls into this category.
I'd like to
If the RawData type were to be used, would you be able to share a
Classpath installation with other Classpath-based virtual machines?
--Steve Augart
Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Steven Augart wrote:
If we were to do this in the GNU Classpath Java code, then the only
solution I see is to use a
Steven Augart wrote:
If the RawData type were to be used, would you be able to share a
Classpath installation with other Classpath-based virtual machines?
For some purposes yes. For performance (and some bootstrapping) reasons
I compile Classpath code ahead of time to a CLI assembly, so at
Michael Koch wrote:
I just commited my big NIO patch. I doesnt contain yet
anything from the big pointer discussion. It is just a merge from
libgcj.
It reworks java.io file operations to use java.nio.channels internally
for performance. I have done a full mauve run and found no new strange
Hi Guilhelm,
Thanks for the info. Your numbers tend to confirm my suspicion that the
factor of 200 is a Kissme-specific problem.
In the meantime, I think I have come across a problem in Kissme's
implementation of the CONSTANT_STRING instruction that does some way
towards explaining this.
--
Tom Tromey wrote:
My only comment or criticism is that, in the absence of regular
checking for this, we'll just see more code like it checked in.
That's been the experience with non-C89 constructs, I don't see why
this would be any different. It's just too hard to remember to write
in some
Michael Koch wrote:
Am Freitag, 9. April 2004 15:38 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
Hi,
If there aren't any objections, I'll commit the attached fix.
Why do you need this ? Is this for network related stuff ?
No, FileDescriptor is documented to have a public constructor. I don't
see the point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 9. April 2004 15:38 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
Hi,
If there aren't any objections, I'll commit the attached fix.
Why do you need this ? Is this for network related stuff ?
Michael
- --
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
-BEGIN
Am Freitag, 9. April 2004 16:27 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
Michael Koch wrote:
Am Freitag, 9. April 2004 15:38 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
Hi,
If there aren't any objections, I'll commit the attached fix.
Why do you need this ? Is this for network related stuff ?
No, FileDescriptor is
Am Freitag, 9. April 2004 15:24 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
Michael Koch wrote:
I just commited my big NIO patch. I doesnt contain yet
anything from the big pointer discussion. It is just a merge from
libgcj.
It reworks java.io file operations to use java.nio.channels
internally for
Hi,
Committed.
Regards,
Jeroen
2004-04-09 Jeroen Frijters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* java/net/URLConnection.java: (setContentHandlerFactory): Fixed
to check static field instead of argument.
Index: java/net/URLConnection.java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 9. April 2004 16:47 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@
*/
public static synchronized void
setContentHandlerFactory(ContentHandlerFactory factory)
{
-if (factory != null)
+if (URLConnection.factory !=
Michael Koch wrote:
Am Freitag, 9. April 2004 16:47 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@
*/
public static synchronized void
setContentHandlerFactory(ContentHandlerFactory factory)
{
-if (factory != null)
+if (URLConnection.factory != null)
throw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thats a hack; its dirty and its non-intuitive. I'd advice against that.
What about having a source formatter that checks this? A make check seems
like a good candidate to report warnings like these.
On Friday 09 April 2004 15:49, Eric Blake wrote:
Tom Tromey wrote:
[...]
A third option would be for you to periodically try it out and check
in patches like the one you sent :-). Assuming the other developers
are ok with this, it wouldn't be unreasonable, just a bit messy.
This seems like the best way to handle the situation.
I have a minor
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 16:36, Michael Koch wrote:
Hi all,
With my big NIO commit I accidently commited the first part (the parts
in configure.ac) for this patch and so I decided to commit it fully.
We now have two options for installing our classes
--enable-glibj
installs glibj.zip
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
I am starting to have difficulty understanding Classpath's goals and
motivations.
When I proposed to add to Classpath some mechanism to allow it to be
customized to each VM, I was told that it would be a heresy to encode
any VM-specific thing into Classpath, as the
Brian,
I think you're thinking of --without-zip? This option still exists, but it
hasn't seemed to work since classpath 0.05...
Rob.
Original Message Follows
From: C. Brian Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22 matches
Mail list logo
