Hi Thomas,
Thomas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 May 2004 09:25, Michael Koch wrote:
Am Sonntag, 9. Mai 2004 08:47 schrieb Thomas Zander:
On Saturday 08 May 2004 18:52, Sven de Marothy wrote:
Should one aim at reproducing the Sun implementation, or at being
a
Steven == Steven Augart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steven So, for the purposes of GNU Classpath's AWT code
Steven (--portable-native-sync), is it reasonable to assume that they are,
Steven indeed, 1, 5, and 10, or should the implementation check the values at
Steven run time and cache the
Archie Cobbs wrote:
BUT you also need to cvs add first before it will work right.
@augart-tp23: ~/JikesRVM/ClasspathCVS/classpath/native/jni/gtk-peer $ cvs add
gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_GThreadNativeMethodRunner.c
cvs [server aborted]: add requires write access to the repository
@augart-tp23:
Am Sonntag, 9. Mai 2004 08:47 schrieb Thomas Zander:
On Saturday 08 May 2004 18:52, Sven de Marothy wrote:
Should one aim at reproducing the Sun implementation, or at being
a 'correct' one?
It is my understanding that we implement the spec; so bugs in Suns
code are not relevant information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 May 2004 09:25, Michael Koch wrote:
Am Sonntag, 9. Mai 2004 08:47 schrieb Thomas Zander:
On Saturday 08 May 2004 18:52, Sven de Marothy wrote:
Should one aim at reproducing the Sun implementation, or at being
a 'correct' one?
5 matches
Mail list logo