Re: Task: java.awt.geom.GeneralPath

2004-05-10 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Thomas, Thomas wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 10 May 2004 09:25, Michael Koch wrote: Am Sonntag, 9. Mai 2004 08:47 schrieb Thomas Zander: On Saturday 08 May 2004 18:52, Sven de Marothy wrote: Should one aim at reproducing the Sun implementation, or at being a

Re: Question on java.lang.Thread and final static int constants

2004-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
Steven == Steven Augart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steven So, for the purposes of GNU Classpath's AWT code Steven (--portable-native-sync), is it reasonable to assume that they are, Steven indeed, 1, 5, and 10, or should the implementation check the values at Steven run time and cache the

Re: patches that include new files (was: Patch: java.awt.image.DataBuffer[Short|Float|Double])

2004-05-10 Thread Steven Augart
Archie Cobbs wrote: BUT you also need to cvs add first before it will work right. @augart-tp23: ~/JikesRVM/ClasspathCVS/classpath/native/jni/gtk-peer $ cvs add gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_GThreadNativeMethodRunner.c cvs [server aborted]: add requires write access to the repository @augart-tp23:

Re: Task: java.awt.geom.GeneralPath

2004-05-10 Thread Michael Koch
Am Sonntag, 9. Mai 2004 08:47 schrieb Thomas Zander: On Saturday 08 May 2004 18:52, Sven de Marothy wrote: Should one aim at reproducing the Sun implementation, or at being a 'correct' one? It is my understanding that we implement the spec; so bugs in Suns code are not relevant information

Re: Task: java.awt.geom.GeneralPath

2004-05-10 Thread Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 10 May 2004 09:25, Michael Koch wrote: Am Sonntag, 9. Mai 2004 08:47 schrieb Thomas Zander: On Saturday 08 May 2004 18:52, Sven de Marothy wrote: Should one aim at reproducing the Sun implementation, or at being a 'correct' one?