Steven == Steven Augart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steven * ChangeLog: Restore corrupted umlauts.
Steven Some time between 2004-04-07 and 2004-05-01, somebody used
Steven an editing tool on ChangeLog that converted Bernd Mösli's surname
Steven to Mvsli, and similarly corrupted the names of Jörg
Michael Koch wrote:
Which leads us to the discussion again what type a file descriptor
should have. Is an int (4 byte) enought for 64 bit archs ? What about
128 bit archs in the future ? From the last discussions fd should be at
least long when. I know that GNU classpath currently uses int but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 11. Mai 2004 22:36 schrieb Steven Augart:
Michael Koch wrote:
Which leads us to the discussion again what type a file
descriptor should have. Is an int (4 byte) enought for 64 bit
archs ? What about 128 bit archs in the future ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 11. Mai 2004 19:03 schrieb Arnaud Vandyck:
Some comments about this cryptic message!
Dalibor and Mark told me one day that it's difficult to merge
gnujaxp because of the $Id$ tags in some files. When they compare
files, the diff were
Michael Koch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 11. Mai 2004 22:36 schrieb Steven Augart:
Michael Koch wrote:
Which leads us to the discussion again what type a file
descriptor should have. Is an int (4 byte) enought for 64 bit
archs ? What about 128 bit archs in
It turns out that glib's g_critical() facility, used
to report serious problems, calls g_log(), which then goes ahead
and calls the g_thread functions again. Which are the very ones
that are trying to report the problem.
I've switched the error reporting in the --portable-native-sync
back to
Steven Augart wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
What if someone wants to port GNU classpath to an Operating System
with totally different semantics like Windows ?
If someone does that kind of port, he'll have more problems than just
than the size of a file descriptor.
I think Michael was being ironic.
On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 12:46, Tom Tromey wrote:
Steven == Steven Augart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steven So, for the purposes of GNU Classpath's AWT code
Steven (--portable-native-sync), is it reasonable to assume that they are,
Steven indeed, 1, 5, and 10, or should the implementation check
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 20:41, Per Bothner wrote:
Steven Augart wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
What if someone wants to port GNU classpath to an Operating System
with totally different semantics like Windows ?
If someone does that kind of port, he'll have more problems than just
than
9 matches
Mail list logo
