Ok, back to the problem:
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.adaptor.core.BundleResourceHandler.openConnection
(BundleResourceHandler.java:138)
at java.net.URL.openConnection (URL.java:658)
I bet, that there is no URLStreamHandler set (instance
Am Fr, den 02.07.2004 schrieb Roman Kennke um 13:57:
Ok, back to the problem:
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.adaptor.core.BundleResourceHandler.openConnection
(BundleResourceHandler.java:138)
at java.net.URL.openConnection (URL.java:658)
Roman Kennke wrote:
Am Fr, den 02.07.2004 schrieb Roman Kennke um 13:57:
Ok, back to the problem:
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.eclipse.osgi.framework.adaptor.core.BundleResourceHandler.
openConnection (BundleResourceHandler.java:138)
at
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Sounds good to me. I wouldn't actually throw out any methods, simply
because eventually someone will have to put it back in and that's just
more time -- there's usually also a good reason a method hook has been
put in, I imagine. I can see the situation where someone
Hi,
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 21:46, Roman Kennke wrote:
... another possibility is, that we should not go into the else branch
in BundleResourceHandler.openConnection, but instead into the if branch:
if (bundleEntry != null) {
return (new BundleURLConnection bla)
} else {
some stuff
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 13:51, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Has anyone run the JDK 1.5 beta against Classpath using japitools? I
know its not production but it may be interesting to see what the
differences are. The licensing is different on the beta, so I'm wary
about
Hi,
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 23:38, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Found this one. For some reason the code looks like this:
if (url.getPath() != null)
// A call to a URL constructor has been made
// that uses an authorized URL as its context.
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 14:10, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Given that Classpath doesn't implement any JDK API release fully, afaik,
i think it's a little illusionary to demand that it fully supports three
of them, given the current man-power of the project :) We are talking
about a few thousand
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 14:15, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Sounds good to me. I wouldn't actually throw out any methods, simply
because eventually someone will have to put it back in and that's just
more time -- there's usually also a good reason a method hook has been
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 12:41, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Andrew John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I don't know if anyone here has heard about the recent release of Sun's
Project Looking Glass under the GPL. Its no doubt a good sign to see
Sun releasing
Andrew == Andrew John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew Anyway, the floor is over to you guys. Be gentle ;-) --
Andrew Andrew :-)
I think this got as close to an authoritative answer/consensus as we
can expect to get on this issue:
11 matches
Mail list logo