Re: GNU Classpath 0.12, ..., 1.0

2004-11-12 Thread Steven Augart
Mark Wielaard wrote: Yup. I am going way to slowly through the regressions. Hopefully we get them all fixed. But I cannot guarantee. I should have been more clear on the release dates. I will make sure to re-announce those more clearly for the next release. While I was preparing the release last

RE: ANNOUNCE: japitools 0.9.5 released

2004-11-12 Thread Jeroen Frijters
C. Brian Jones wrote: I'm somewhat interested in this for use in javah/javap, to replace gnu.bytecode which again does way more than is necessary. Is it suitable Jeroen and would you be willing to put it in Classpath tools or let me do it? The current code has some ties to Japize, but it

Re: ANNOUNCE: japitools 0.9.5 released

2004-11-12 Thread Michael Koch
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2004 20:17 schrieb Stuart Ballard: Download: http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/japitools-0.9.5.tar.gz Is it just me or is this tarball nearly empty ? It is only 125 bytes for me and only contains a link from japi to japitools. Michael -- Homepage:

Re: java.lang.System changes

2004-11-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 06:36, Steven Augart wrote: The actual problem I'm seeing is that (after having done some rearranging of the sequence in which we run static class initializers), when I start up my VM, I get a nasty stack trace like this: Exception in thread Jikes_RVM_Boot_Thread:

Re: java.lang.System changes

2004-11-12 Thread Steven Augart
Mark Wielaard wrote: Would/Does the following patch help you out? 2004-11-12 Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] * java/net/URL.java (cache_handlers): Removed field. (static): Removed block. (getURLStreamHandler): Don't use cache_handlers anymore. This looks like a solution

Re: ANNOUNCE: japitools 0.9.5 released

2004-11-12 Thread Stuart Ballard
Michael Koch wrote: Is it just me or is this tarball nearly empty ? It is only 125 bytes for me and only contains a link from japi to japitools. Oops. Fixed. Sorry. D'oh. Stuart. -- Stuart Ballard, Senior Web Developer NetReach, Inc. (215) 283-2300, ext. 126 http://www.netreach.com/

Re: java.lang.System changes

2004-11-12 Thread Steven Augart
Mark Wielaard wrote: Would/Does the following patch help you out? 2004-11-12 Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] * java/net/URL.java (cache_handlers): Removed field. (static): Removed block. (getURLStreamHandler): Don't use cache_handlers anymore. Thanks for the attempt. I'm

RE: java.lang.System changes

2004-11-12 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Steven Augart wrote: I received a suggestion in private mail from David Holmes (who's been generous with his time in discussing this with me) that we could break up the initialization of java.lang.System into two explicitly-invoked phases, and that a VM could optionally request that the

patch for 0.12 (was: Re: java.lang.System changes)

2004-11-12 Thread Steven Augart
Jeroen Frijters wrote: Steven Augart wrote: I received a suggestion in private mail from David Holmes (who's been generous with his time in discussing this with me) that we could break up the initialization of java.lang.System into two explicitly-invoked phases, and that a VM could optionally

RE: patch for 0.12 (was: Re: java.lang.System changes)

2004-11-12 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Steven Augart wrote: Jeroen Frijters wrote: Steven Augart wrote: I received a suggestion in private mail from David Holmes (who's been generous with his time in discussing this with me) that we could break up the initialization of java.lang.System into two explicitly-invoked phases,

Re: patch for 0.12 (was: Re: java.lang.System changes)

2004-11-12 Thread Steven Augart
Jeroen Frijters wrote: Steven Augart wrote: And, to that end, I have the following small patch that makes the current Classpath CVS head work with Jikes RVM. If someone else approves it, I'll commit it. It works fine for me. Thanks for looking at it, Jeroen. I've committed this change to

Re: Mauve results...

2004-11-12 Thread Bryce McKinlay
Hey David, Very nice. What did you use to format the results? Regards Bryce David Gilbert wrote: I ran (most of) the Mauve tests tonight (using JamVM 1.2 and the latest CVS version of Classpath) and posted the results here for anyone that is interested:

Re: Mauve results...

2004-11-12 Thread David Gilbert
I wrote a custom subclass of TestHarness, the source code is here if you or anyone wants to look at it: http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/mauve-report/mauve-report.zip I'm short on time this month and next, but in January I will try to write some documentation about how to generate the

RE: patch for 0.12 (was: Re: java.lang.System changes)

2004-11-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 17:45, Jeroen Frijters wrote: Steven Augart wrote: And, to that end, I have the following small patch that makes the current Classpath CVS head work with Jikes RVM. If someone else approves it, I'll commit it. It works fine for me. Thanks to you both for

Re: patch for 0.12 (was: Re: java.lang.System changes)

2004-11-12 Thread Steven Augart
Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 17:45, Jeroen Frijters wrote: Steven Augart wrote: And, to that end, I have the following small patch that makes the current Classpath CVS head work with Jikes RVM. If someone else approves it, I'll commit it. It works fine for me. Thanks to you both