Hi all,
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 22:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
We do now have a few small regressions however. There is something wrong
with zip/jar archives on the classpath (this might or might not be a GNU
Classpath issue, we changed the VM interface subtly so maybe it is a
runtime issue).
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:58:53 +0100, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Eclipse 3 (but not 2) startup problem seems to only happen on SMP
machine (it disappears when I don't use a SMP kernel, this is on a Intel
hyperthreading system) with jamvm [*]. It works fine with gcj/gij
Robert Lougher wrote:
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:58:53 +0100, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Eclipse 3 (but not 2) startup problem seems to only happen on SMP
machine (it disappears when I don't use a SMP kernel, this is on a Intel
hyperthreading system) with jamvm [*]. It works
sorry, please CC responses to that last message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris
Chris Pickett wrote:
Robert Lougher wrote:
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:58:53 +0100, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Eclipse 3 (but not 2) startup problem seems to only happen
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
even. my apologies, i'm really tired, i already retyped the whole email
once b/c i made thunderbird die.
chris
Chris Pickett wrote:
sorry, please CC responses to that last message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris
Chris Pickett wrote:
Robert
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Thanks to you both for working on this issue.
This works for now, but I hope you won't mind if we rip it out again for
0.13. One Thing I don't like about this is that it creates a new compile
time constant which makes it harder to share an GNU Classpath glibj.zip
class byte
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 19:49, Tom Tromey wrote:
Bojan == Bojan Antonovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bojan Java 5.0 has some new language extensions. Many (?) of them, like
Bojan generics, are compiled in the way that the byte code binary is
Bojan compatible to older versions. While extending
Hello, all.
Given that we're pretty much up to 1.1-api compatibility at the moment,
and we'll be there in the forseeable future, perhaps it's time to
discuss some of the few remaining gaps to Java 1.2.
One of these is printing. So here's a short intro to printing in Java
for those not
On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 00:40, Sven de Marothy wrote:
Hello, all.
Given that we're pretty much up to 1.1-api compatibility at the moment,
and we'll be there in the forseeable future, perhaps it's time to
discuss some of the few remaining gaps to Java 1.2.
One of these is printing. So here's a
9 matches
Mail list logo
