Question about VMRuntime

Hi guys, I am implementing a VM of my own (http://www.geocities.com/shikan_taza/vajra.html) and have a question regarding the VMRuntime class: This class is available in glibj.zip; does this mean that I do not have to implement this class? But I couldn't locate any .so file containing the native

Re: gij as JRE 5

Andrew John Hughes writes: On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 19:49, Tom Tromey wrote: Bojan == Bojan Antonovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bojan Java 5.0 has some new language extensions. Many (?) of them, like Bojan generics, are compiled in the way that the byte code binary is Bojan

Re: Question about VMRuntime

Rajesh Jayaprakash wrote: have a question regarding the VMRuntime class: This class is available in glibj.zip; does this mean that I do not have to implement this class? But I couldn't locate any .so file containing the native methods required for this class, so even if I use the

RE: gij as JRE 5

Andrew Haley wrote: Make 1.5 bytecode a reqiurement for the 1.0 branch. I don't understand what you mean by this. Supporting 1.5 bytecode in the VM is trivial, but we don't have any 1.5 source compilers yet, do we? I know Tom's working on gcjx, but AFAIK it isn't in a working state yet and

Texual IPv6 address

Hello, The java.net.Inet6Address class seems to produce invalid textual representations in some cases. In the example below, the output is IPv6:1010:2020::1 instead of IPv6:1010:0:0:0:0:2020:0:1 (or 1010::2020:0:1) that one would expect. I've included a patch that deactivates the

Re: Texual IPv6 address

Am Sonntag, 14. November 2004 19:03 schrieb Mattias Rehnberg: Hello, The java.net.Inet6Address class seems to produce invalid textual representations in some cases. In the example below, the output is IPv6:1010:2020::1 instead of IPv6:1010:0:0:0:0:2020:0:1 (or 1010::2020:0:1) that one

Re: Texual IPv6 address

Mattias Rehnberg wrote: Hello, The java.net.Inet6Address class seems to produce invalid textual representations in some cases. In the example below, the output is IPv6:1010:2020::1 instead of IPv6:1010:0:0:0:0:2020:0:1 (or 1010::2020:0:1) that one would expect. I've included a patch that

RE: gij as JRE 5

On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 19:36, Jeroen Frijters wrote: Andrew Haley wrote: Make 1.5 bytecode a reqiurement for the 1.0 branch. I don't understand what you mean by this. Supporting 1.5 bytecode in the VM is trivial, but we don't have any 1.5 source compilers yet, do we? I know Tom's working

GNU Classpath 0.12 released

We are pleased to announce a new developer snapshot release of GNU Classpath. GNU Classpath, Essential Libraries for Java, is a project to create free core class libraries for use with runtimes, compilers and tools for the java programming language. GNU Classpath 0.12 can be downloaded from

Re: SMP problems (was Re: GNU Classpath 0.12, ..., 1.0)

Hi, Further to my previous email, here's a patch to JamVM 1.2.0 to include memory barriers on Intel. Mark, as you've seen the problem with Eclipse 3, could you give it a test? If there's anybody else who's seen problems I'd be grateful if you could also give it a go. Thanks, Rob. P.S. I

ANN: Out-of-the-box SableVM support for GNU Classpath [was: Re: GNU Classpath 0.12 released]

On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 19:10, Mark Wielaard wrote: We are pleased to announce a new developer snapshot release of GNU Classpath. Congratulations on the release. I also have some good news. It is now possible to run SableVM Java Virtual Machine directly with GNU Classpath. For example I

Re: Question about VMRuntime

Steven, Chris, Thank you very much for your replies. Regarding joining one of the free VM projects, I have just a wee bit more to do in Vajra to make it functional (albeit with a lot of bugs ;-) and incomplete implementations [*]). Once I am done with this, I will give your advice serious