Hi Christian,
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 12:22 +0100, Nicolas Geoffray wrote:
gnu/java/lang/instrument. Would you like InstrumentationImpl
to be in vm/reference/java/lang/InsutrumentationImpl? This sounds
weird. We could also make the callTransformers method public.
Here's a fix that eases implementation of the
VMInstrumentationImpl.redefineClasses
method. The VM might not want to keep the Instrument object, therefore
it must
be given explicitely to the VMInstrumentationImpl.redefineClasses method
2005-12-04 Nicolas Geoffray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Here's a small documentation on how to use the instrumentation
functionnality in gnu classpath generics for vm implementers.
I added at the end that default implementation might break the
ClassLoader/VMClassLoader interface.
2005-12-04 Nicolas Geoffray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Nicolas,
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 16:20 +0100, Nicolas Geoffray wrote:
2005-12-04 Nicolas Geoffray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* doc/vmintegration.texinfo: Added subsection in the classpath
hooks for the VMInstrumentationImpl class.
Thanks for writing this.
Two small
Hi,
After the last discussion about TransferHandler and security issues it
seemed safer to me to just disallow any copy/paste between untrusted
code paths as was suggested earlier.
2005-12-04 Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* javax/swing/TransferHandler
Maybe yes. The recent insecure approach comes from the historcal past.
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
After the last discussion about TransferHandler and security issues it
seemed safer to me to just disallow any copy/paste between untrusted
code paths as was suggested earlier.
2005-12-04 Mark
Hi Mark
Maybe explicitly say for calling the
@code{InstrumentationImpl.callTransformers} when a class byte code is
defined with @code{ClassLoader.defineClass}
So the vm implementer knows this is their job at the moment.
Allright added. I'm committing this in the main branch.
2005-12-04
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 21:04 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I recently hit on the same bug again for the second time, and still
there seems to be no general solution to it. ecj is a Java-based Java
compiler, which means that in compiling Classpath, it can run across
Greetings,
I'm using gjdoc-0.7.6 to test a new port of JamVM-1.4.1 +
classpath-0.19 on OpenBSD. I'm trying to get gjdoc to do all the
classpath documentation. gjdoc makes a lot of progress (it's
outputting stuff), but blows off by hitting an upper memory limit.
My question is this: Should I
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/classpath
Module name:classpath
Branch: generics-branch
Changes by: Nicolas Geoffray [EMAIL PROTECTED]05/12/04 13:19:39
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
vm/reference/java/lang: VMInstrumentationImpl.java
java/lang
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/classpath
Module name:classpath
Branch:
Changes by: Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/12/04 19:51:44
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
javax/swing: TransferHandler.java
Log message:
*
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/classpath
Module name:classpath
Branch:
Changes by: Guilhem Lavaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/12/04 20:52:47
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
java/net : URL.java
Log message:
2005-12-04 Guilhem Lavaux [EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo