On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 13:49 +0200, Thomas Zander wrote:
On Saturday 28 May 2005 14:46, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I imagine its reasonable to suggest supporting RMI
(which requires serialization) for e.g. the SpinnerDateModel, but I
don't see why we need it for the components (perhaps
On Saturday 28 May 2005 14:46, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I imagine its reasonable to suggest supporting RMI
(which requires serialization) for e.g. the SpinnerDateModel, but I
don't see why we need it for the components (perhaps someone wants to
enlighten me?)
There are people that find the
Am Samstag, den 28.05.2005, 13:46 +0100 schrieb Andrew John Hughes:
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 09:24 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 12:09:00AM +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 23:14 +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi,
I updated all
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 09:24 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 12:09:00AM +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 23:14 +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi,
I updated all serialVersionUIDs in the javax.swing package to be
compatible with JDK1.4. I
Hi,
I updated all serialVersionUIDs in the javax.swing package to be
compatible with JDK1.4. I intentionally left out some cases where I
would probably break build with GCJ3 (accessible stuff). Have me made
any progress on this issue?
2005-05-27 Roman Kennke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 23:14 +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi,
I updated all serialVersionUIDs in the javax.swing package to be
compatible with JDK1.4. I intentionally left out some cases where I
would probably break build with GCJ3 (accessible stuff). Have me made
any progress on this issue?
6 matches
Mail list logo
