On Thursday 23 October 2003 20:26, Stuart Ballard wrote:
I think I see a fairly simple way that OMG could preserve the integrity
of the CORBA standard while remaining Free Software. In much the same
way as some Free licenses allow free modification but require that
anyone making such
Chris Gray wrote:
But it would of course be incompatible with the GPL ...
Probably, but definitely compatible with Classpath's modified version of
the GPL.
There would be problems for GPL software that wished to *use* the
org.omg classes, but not for the integration of the classes into
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 22:57, Stuart Ballard wrote:
Chris Gray wrote:
But it would of course be incompatible with the GPL ...
Probably, but definitely compatible with Classpath's modified version of
the GPL.
There would be problems for GPL software that wished to *use* the
org.omg
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 20:26, Stuart Ballard wrote:
I think I see a fairly simple way that OMG could preserve the integrity
of the CORBA standard while remaining Free Software. In much the same
way as some Free licenses allow free modification but require that
anyone making such
On Oct 24, 2003, at 10:55 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 20:26, Stuart Ballard wrote:
I think I see a fairly simple way that OMG could preserve the
integrity
of the CORBA standard while remaining Free Software. In much the same
way as some Free licenses allow free
Hi,
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 13:45, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
How does the org.omg spec differ from the java.* spec which is also
non-modifiable according to its license?
I haven't studied specs or books on org.omg yet, so I cannot tell you. I
was talking about software distributed under the
Folks,
If all we have to do to keep GNU / FSF happy for now is to remove
the link to the OMG from the website, lets just do it. I hardly think
this is a major issue.
In the long term though, there is a bigger problem looming. At some
point, Classpath needs to support the org.omg.* classes.
7 matches
Mail list logo