Re: Fosdem discussions (Was: Importing GNU Classpath 0.20)

2006-01-19 Thread Andrew Haley
Dalibor Topic writes: Tom Tromey wrote: David == David Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David (1) The GNU Classpath version number I doubt we could avoid this topic, or Harmony, even if we wanted to :-) Since Harmony is doing its own thing now, beside common

Fosdem discussions (Was: Importing GNU Classpath 0.20)

2006-01-18 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi (CC classpath list), In response to the importing of 0.20 into GCC, Tom, Jeroen and I had the following small exchange: On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 08:26 +0100, Jeroen Frijters wrote: Mark Wielaard wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 09:32 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: Mark == Mark Wielaard [EMAIL

Re: Fosdem discussions (Was: Importing GNU Classpath 0.20)

2006-01-18 Thread David Gilbert
Mark Wielaard wrote: This is one of the topics that I would like to discuss during the last part of our Fosdem meeting (Feb 25/26, Brussels): http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/events/fosdem06.html Sunday from 14:00 to 17:30 - The Future Interactive technical hacker

Re: Fosdem discussions (Was: Importing GNU Classpath 0.20)

2006-01-18 Thread Tom Tromey
Mark == Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mark Quick round where everybody tells what their personal, group, Mark organization/company work items are for the immediate and long Mark term future/next year. Someone (we haven't discussed who yet :-) from Red Hat will talk about what

Re: Fosdem discussions (Was: Importing GNU Classpath 0.20)

2006-01-18 Thread Dalibor Topic
Tom Tromey wrote: David == David Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David (1) The GNU Classpath version number I doubt we could avoid this topic, or Harmony, even if we wanted to :-) Since Harmony is doing its own thing now, beside common goals[1], I wouldn't expect any code to cross