Re: GNU Classpath 0.06 created

2003-09-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 19:51, Per Bothner wrote: If you've created a cvs tag, and given it a real version number, I'd call it a release, even if it's not a 1.0 relase. alpha.gnu.org has outlived its usefulness (evidenced by the fact that it is little used) now that alpha code is available

RE: GNU Classpath 0.06 created

2003-08-26 Thread Qiong Cai
Hi, Does ORP 1.10 work with this new release? After browsing through the mailing list archives, I cannot find why ORP is broken with the classpath. I really like to do some experiments on some server benchmarks like tomcat/jboss and jbb by using ORP+classpath, and I believe the latest classpath

RE: GNU Classpath 0.06 created

2003-08-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 08:07, Qiong Cai wrote: Does ORP 1.10 work with this new release? After browsing through the mailing list archives, I cannot find why ORP is broken with the classpath. I don't think Orp will work out of the box with the 0.06 snapshot. But the changes since the last

Re: GNU Classpath 0.06 created

2003-08-24 Thread Per Bothner
Mark Wielaard wrote: Although I don't have access yet to alpha.gnu.org to publish the release I have already created the 0.06 release tarball. I also tagged the CVS tree as 'classpath-0_06-release'. You don't put releases on alpha.gnu.org - you put them on ftp.gnu.org. You can put pre-releases on

Re: GNU Classpath 0.06 created

2003-08-24 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 18:07, Per Bothner wrote: You don't put releases on alpha.gnu.org - you put them on ftp.gnu.org. You can put pre-releases on alpha.gnu.org, but if you already have a release there seems little point. My thinking was that the 0.0x releases are actually the

GNU Classpath 0.06 created

2003-08-23 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, Although I don't have access yet to alpha.gnu.org to publish the release I have already created the 0.06 release tarball. I also tagged the CVS tree as 'classpath-0_06-release'. Current tarball can be found at: http://www.klomp.org/mark/classpath/classpath-0.06.tar.gz It has the following

Re: GNU Classpath 0.06 created

2003-08-23 Thread Per Bothner
Mark Wielaard wrote: My thinking was that the 0.0x releases are actually the pre-releases while we work towards the first real GNU Classpath 1.0 release. People can combine these pre-releases with their own VMs like gcj, kissme, jikesRVM, Jaos, etc already do. But as long as we don't have at