Hi,
Further to my previous email, here's a patch to JamVM 1.2.0 to include
memory barriers on Intel. Mark, as you've seen the problem with
Eclipse 3, could you give it a test? If there's anybody else who's
seen problems I'd be grateful if you could also give it a go.
Thanks,
Rob.
P.S. I
Hi all,
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 22:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
We do now have a few small regressions however. There is something wrong
with zip/jar archives on the classpath (this might or might not be a GNU
Classpath issue, we changed the VM interface subtly so maybe it is a
runtime issue).
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:58:53 +0100, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Eclipse 3 (but not 2) startup problem seems to only happen on SMP
machine (it disappears when I don't use a SMP kernel, this is on a Intel
hyperthreading system) with jamvm [*]. It works fine with gcj/gij
Robert Lougher wrote:
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:58:53 +0100, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Eclipse 3 (but not 2) startup problem seems to only happen on SMP
machine (it disappears when I don't use a SMP kernel, this is on a Intel
hyperthreading system) with jamvm [*]. It works
sorry, please CC responses to that last message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris
Chris Pickett wrote:
Robert Lougher wrote:
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:58:53 +0100, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Eclipse 3 (but not 2) startup problem seems to only happen
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
even. my apologies, i'm really tired, i already retyped the whole email
once b/c i made thunderbird die.
chris
Chris Pickett wrote:
sorry, please CC responses to that last message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris
Chris Pickett wrote:
Robert
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Yup. I am going way to slowly through the regressions. Hopefully we get
them all fixed. But I cannot guarantee. I should have been more clear on
the release dates. I will make sure to re-announce those more clearly
for the next release. While I was preparing the release last
Mark Wielaard wrote:
The (ambitious) goal is still to have a 1.0 release before (or around)
Fosdem (Brussels, 26/27 February 2005).
Excuse me for being the skeptic again, but this seems outrageously
unreasonable to me. We haven't even decided on what should be in the 1.0
release and, frankly, I
Mark Wielaard wrote:
I want to try to make the 0.12 release with all the great new stuff on
Friday (Nov 12).
I would really prefer that we not do the 0.12 release with the stuff
on Friday. As I discovered last night (and have written separately to
the list), changes made on Tuesday have broken
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 22:41, Steven Augart wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
I want to try to make the 0.12 release with all the great new stuff on
Friday (Nov 12).
I would really prefer that we not do the 0.12 release with the stuff
on Friday. As I discovered last night (and have
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 05:00, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.util.jar.JarFile.getInputStream (JarFile.java:458)
at gnu.java.net.protocol.jar.Connection.getInputStream
(Connection.java:163)
at java.net.URL.openStream (URL.java:683)
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 08:06, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
But I noticed one regression. The Sun's SymbolTest you can get from
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/java/jdk-1.2.2/demo/applets/SymbolTest/SymbolTest.java
used to work i.e. 6 months ago and even year ago. But now I only get
Hi all,
I wanted to do a new release last weekend. But that weekend there was a
lot of new code merged from libgcj, build fixes, new bean code, image
code, classloader updates, file name normalization updates, new X.509
certificate (path checking) code and signed jar entries support...
That
[forgot to CC the list on this first time around]
Mark Wielaard wrote:
To focus more on working towards a 1.0 I want to start to make monthly
releases. 0.13 start of December, 0.14 start of January and 0.15 start
of February. The 0.13 release will be the cut-off date for new
packages/classes (we
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 16:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
We do now have a few small regressions however. There is something wrong
with zip/jar archives on the classpath (this might or might not be a GNU
Classpath issue, we changed the VM interface subtly so maybe it is a
runtime issue). Opening a
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:00, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 16:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
We do now have a few small regressions however. There is something wrong
with zip/jar archives on the classpath (this might or might not be a GNU
Classpath issue, we changed the VM
16 matches
Mail list logo
