On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:40:55AM +, David Gilbert wrote:
I didn't get any feedback about this...anyone think it is a good/bad idea?
excellent idea in my opinion. Have you looked at graydon's junit mauve
bridge at
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2003-q4/msg3.html ?
If we do
opinion. Have you looked at graydon's junit mauve
bridge at
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2003-q4/msg3.html ?
I hadn't seen Graydon's bridge class, thanks for the link (and I should
do more research next time). Looking over it, it has the advantage that
it doesn't require
On Saturday 24 December 2005 09:15, Tom Tromey wrote:
Raif == Raif S Naffah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raif the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit
Raif instead. this would make it easier to test using an IDE such
as Raif the Native Eclipse.
Raif is this idea worth
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 01:05 +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Given that the majority (all?) of current tests in Mauve is under the
GPL, without a single copyright holder, I assume, and the license of
JUnit is incompatible with the GPL
IANAL, but my theory is that this is irrelevant unless you
hello all,
soon the GNU Crypto classes will be moving to Classpath. i thought now
is the right time to bring this subject since it makes it easier for
those involved in this work.
the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
this would make it easier to test
Raif == Raif S Naffah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raif the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit
Raif instead. this would make it easier to test using an IDE such as
Raif the Native Eclipse.
Raif is this idea worth discussing or should we consider that for the
Raif
Raif S. Naffah wrote:
hello all,
soon the GNU Crypto classes will be moving to Classpath. i thought now
is the right time to bring this subject since it makes it easier for
those involved in this work.
the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
this would
On 12/23/05, Raif S. Naffah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
this would make it easier to test using an IDE such as the Native
Eclipse.
As an outsider I would love to see that. It would make it easier for
me to write
testcases
.
the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
this would make it easier to test using an IDE such as the Native
Eclipse.
is this idea worth discussing or should we consider that for the
forseeable future Mauve only is the test framework for GNU Classpath?
Hi
.
the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
this would make it easier to test using an IDE such as the Native
Eclipse.
is this idea worth discussing or should we consider that for the
forseeable future Mauve only is the test framework for GNU Classpath?
Hi
Hi list,
I was trying to move the libjdepend-java debian package to our 'main'
section (compiled with free tools) and it compiled fine with kaffe. I
thought it was a good idea to also run the junit tests against the free
compiled version and I got two failures.
Attached is the diff of the junit
11 matches
Mail list logo